{"id":17765,"date":"2016-10-17T11:19:21","date_gmt":"2016-10-17T15:19:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thenatureofcities.com\/?p=17765"},"modified":"2018-08-23T10:54:06","modified_gmt":"2018-08-23T14:54:06","slug":"embedding-urban-ecology-into-policy-west-berlin-as-a-case-study","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thenatureofcities.com\/TNOC\/2016\/10\/17\/embedding-urban-ecology-into-policy-west-berlin-as-a-case-study\/","title":{"rendered":"Embedding Urban Ecology into Policy: West Berlin as a Case Study"},"content":{"rendered":"

A review of<\/em> Greening Berlin: The Co-Production of Science, Politics and Urban Nature<\/strong>. By Jens Lachmund.<\/em> 2013. MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262018593. 320 pages.<\/em> Buy the book.<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

The overgrown train tracks of Gleisdreieck<\/em> Park. The community gardens and art installations of Tempelhofer Feld<\/em>. The flora and fauna of S\u00fcdgel\u00e4nde<\/em> Nature Park. Today\u2019s Berlin is home to diverse landscapes, ecologies, and juxtapositions of natural and manmade history which, together, tell the story of this destroyed, divided, and rebuilt city.<\/p>\n

Greening Berlin<\/em> made me miss the city that I once called home, where layers of history, adaptation, and re-use are evident in nearly every aspect of the built environment. <\/blockquote><\/figure>\n

A reader curious about how these spaces came to be has much to learn from Jens Lachmund\u2019s Greening Berlin: The Co-Production of Science, Politics, and Urban Nature<\/a>. The book explores how the discipline of urban ecology developed in West Berlin, and how it transitioned from an academic pursuit to a cause championed by planners, community organizers, and the general public. The result is a story that is both very particular to Berlin and the politics of a once-divided city, and more widely applicable to landscape and planning practitioners working in ecologically rich urban environments.<\/p>\n

\"greening-berlin-cover\"<\/p>\n

By detailing how urban ecology developed and became integrated into planning policy, Lachmund illustrates how urban ecological values can shape a city\u2019s future land use patterns. However, with the success stories come the inevitable stories of politics, tension, and negotiation, including failures of community advocacy. These stories are valuable to today\u2019s practitioner, as they illustrate how the values of urban ecology can stack up alongside competing recreation, land use, and development interests.<\/p>\n

By weaving together environmental history, policy, and the stories of politically charged parks and conservation projects, Lachmund has offered insight into a topic that will be of interest to planners as well as historians. Greening Berlin<\/em> is a thorough and clear introduction to a subject that can come across as very technical. Although the city, its complicated history, and its particular urban settings are, of course, unique, the narratives addressing policy development, the integration of nature into urban policy, and the conflicts inherent to land use decision-making are universally applicable.<\/p>\n

However, Greening Berlin<\/em> is missing a crucial element: visuals. While the book includes a small number of carefully chosen photographs and diagrams, the narrative calls for many more. It is disappointing that a book about a city with some of Europe\u2019s most interesting green spaces includes few photographs and nothing in color. Spatial analyses\u2014such as maps of the destruction WWII caused to Berlin\u2019s urban fabric and the subsequent ecological studies of damaged spaces\u2014also could have been valuable. Without photos, the book is less stimulating and accessible to readers not already familiar with Berlin, making it better suited to the academic reader.<\/p>\n

Lachmund begins by detailing the traditions of urban greening in Berlin and Germany generally; he also explores the development of the discipline of green space planning. The narrative moves from the traditions of the 19th<\/sup> century Kaiserreich<\/em> through the Garden City movement to postwar reconstruction before exploring the origins of urban ecology. The overall thesis tracks planners, policymakers, and community members gradually seeing greater inherent value in urban nature, as opposed to considering nature and the city as two opposite ends of a spectrum, with the city acting as a corrupting force.<\/p>\n

\"imag1553\"
One of the many examples of adaptative reuse in former West Berlin, today’s G\u00f6rlitzer Park occupies the site of the former train tracks from the historic G\u00f6rlitzer Bahnhof. Photo: Katharine Burgess<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Berlin\u2019s story is critical to an understanding of the history of urban ecology, and\u00a0Greening Berlin<\/em>\u00a0provides many details about the origins of the movement. Lachmund largely focuses on West Berlin, with occasional background information or anecdotes about the very different context and concurrent approaches in East Berlin. As\u00a0Greening Berlin<\/em>\u00a0explains, the botanists of post-war West Berlin are widely credited with initiating the discipline of urban ecology. In studying rubble areas, they discovered new combinations of species that did not align with pre-existing categorizations. Lachmund states that \u201cwastelands were the prototype of an urban ecosystem: their marginality within the urban environment allowed nature to thrive almost unimpeded, and yet it was a nature that was largely determined by the human-made environmental conditions of the city\u201d (67). Lachmund focuses on botanist Herbert Sukopp, who created new models of floral survey to apply to sites in an urban context. Sukopp\u2019s work led to the development of urban ecology as a discipline and, eventually, to an increased appreciation of nature in an urban context.<\/p>\n

Beyond scientists\u2019 work and examination of the city\u2019s damaged urban fabric, the culture and unique geography of West Berlin also contributed to the rise in popularity and visibility of urban ecology. Living in an \u201cisland\u201d of West Germany surrounded by East Germany\u2014with the closest West German landscapes a substantial distance away\u2014residents greatly valued the natural spaces within city limits, and scientists and ecologists used the city as a \u201chome turf\u201d to study. Citizen activism, including projects led by squatters, was significant. And even after the postwar damage was addressed, design and planning remained important, given the city\u2019s visibility and role as a model and antithesis to East Berlin. For example, the 1984 Internationale Bauausstellung<\/em> (IBA, or International Building Exhibition) was an impetus for large-scale redevelopment within the city center, igniting international discussion and the creation of new buildings and new public spaces.<\/p>\n

\"img_9609\"
Tiergarten, Berlin’s most well-known inner city park and one of historic West Berlin’s most symbolic green spaces, features prominently in Greening Berlin. Photo: Katharine Burgess<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The professionalization of landscape planning is another theme that Lachmund explores. In the mid-\u201870s, Berlin\u2019s Senate Department for Construction and Housing employed only one full time and two part-time staff devoted to nature conservation. By 1979, the city\u2019s new Nature Conservation Act had led to the creation of 39 new positions. Meanwhile, new resources and institutions dedicated to urban ecology began working. For example, the book details the founding of the influential Stiftung Naturschutz<\/em> (Nature Conservation Foundation) as well as the Bund f\u00fcr Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland<\/em> (Alliance for Environmental and Nature Protection).<\/p>\n

Lachmund further traces how urban ecology influenced West Berlin planning policies and the approach to land use in the city today. For example, the concept of biotopes\u2014defined as the natural living spaces of urban wildlife\u2014is applied within planning policy through the Biotope Protection Regime. Lachmund explores how biotope protection has been used in planning and land use policy and also examines the concept more philosophically, musing, \u201cbiotope protection has participated in the never-ending process of creating order in the city\u201d (9). Today, biotopes are not only regulated on the city level, but on the federal level, with a rule that requires L\u00e4nder <\/em>(states) to set up networks of linked biotopes covering 10 percent of their area.<\/p>\n

Lachmund presents Gleisdreieck<\/em> and S\u00fcdgel\u00e4nde<\/em>, which are both natural parks on abandoned rail sites, as two case studies in the latter half of the book. Lachmund seems to relish the political back stories of these parks, describing even the concept of a nature park within Berlin as \u201ca matter of conflict and constant negotiation between the participants of the planning process\u201d (191). The book explores the role of B\u00fcrgerinitiativen<\/em>, or community initiatives, in developing these parks, as well as the role of mitigation requirements. Indeed, many of the largest new park projects in Berlin were spurred by mitigation needs, meaning that the land conservation compensated for development elsewhere. Lachmund also explores the tensions between the desire for conservation and the need to provide opportunities for recreation, and the differing interpretations of legislation on recreation and conservation.<\/p>\n

As an urban planner who recently returned from living and working in Berlin, Greening Berlin<\/em> made me miss the city that I once called home. During my time there, the layers of history, adaptation, and re-use evident in nearly every aspect of the built environment fascinated me endlessly. Beyond that, the ambitious goals of the German landscape planning system\u2014and the large-scale public projects, such as Gleisdreieck<\/em> and S\u00fcdgel\u00e4nde<\/em>\u2014are enough to inspire any planner. Reading Lachmund\u2019s history of this place was a fantastic way to embed myself in the built and natural environment of Berlin again, considering not only the setting and local policies, but also how shifting perceptions, values, and means of scientific observation have facilitated the city\u2019s physical transformation.
\n<\/a>
\nKatharine Burgess<\/strong>
\nWashington, D.C.<\/p>\n

On The Nature of Cities<\/a><\/p>\n