{"id":24953,"date":"2017-10-22T09:00:08","date_gmt":"2017-10-22T13:00:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thenatureofcities.com\/?p=24953"},"modified":"2017-10-22T09:54:32","modified_gmt":"2017-10-22T13:54:32","slug":"can-religion-help-pursuit-urban-sustainability","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thenatureofcities.com\/TNOC\/2017\/10\/22\/can-religion-help-pursuit-urban-sustainability\/","title":{"rendered":"How Can Religion Help in the Pursuit of Urban Sustainability?"},"content":{"rendered":"
Faith communities have great potential to act as a force for urban sustainability\u2014urbanists need to engage with them.<\/blockquote><\/figure> Increasingly, urban nature is viewed not only as a scientific, technological or design issue, but a moral one. The recent TNOC roundtable \u201cEcosystems for everyone<\/a>\u201d rested on the assumption that provision of and access to ecosystem services and urban nature is a \u201cmoral imperative\u201d. Indeed, Steward Pickett began his contribution with the statement \u201cThe availability of ecosystem services for everyone is an unarguable moral stance\u201d. Yet with all this discussion of morals, ethics and justice, there is a conspicuous absence of discussion on the place of religion in sustainable and ecologically-flourishing cities. Roger Gottlieb argues in the Oxford Handbook of Ecology and Religion<\/em><\/a> that religion is the “arbiter and repository of life’s deepest moral values”. If this is the case, then surely anyone who is compelled by moral arguments to pursue ecologically-flourishing cities must consider the role of religion. In this blog, I will attempt to answer some key questions around the relevance of religion for sustainable cities and outline why I think religion might be a \u201csleeping giant\u201d in this endeavour.<\/p>\n
\"\"
The potential for religious institutions to promote urban sustainability has been vastly overlooked. Photo: Photo by Daniel Tseng on Unsplash.com<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

First, how compatible are religious beliefs with visions of ecological flourishing? A common (if antiquated) view is that religion\u2014particularly monothetistic faiths in the Judaeo-Christian tradition\u2014are responsible for peddling an anthropocentric and exploitative paradigm that is the root cause of the environmental crisis. This view was argued 50 years ago by Lynne White in his famous essay titled \u201cThe historical roots of our ecological crisis\u201d. While many faiths may not have been moral leaders in highlighting humanity\u2019s unsustainable exploitation of resources since the industrial revolution, the rise of environmentalism has caused religious scholars to dig deeper into the teachings of their respective traditions. What has emerged is a wealth of moral resources, grounded in scripture, affirming the sacredness of nature and humanity\u2019s responsibility to care for it. Indeed, Bill McKibbin concludes that “only our religious institutions, among the mainstream organizations of Western, Asian, and indigenous societies, can say with real conviction, and with any chance of an audience, that there is some point to life beyond accumulation”[1]. This \u201cecological awakening\u201d of religious faiths can be seen in the emergence of organisations such as the Alliance for Religion and Conservation and in explicit teachings such as Pope Francis\u2019<\/a> recent Encyclical on the environment (summarised here<\/a>). The potential for religions to be allies for the environmental cause<\/a> is increasingly recognised<\/a> by secular conservation organisations, with the Society for Conservation Biology recently establishing a conservation and religion working group.<\/p>\n

\"\"
Pope Francis\u2019 teachings have emphasised the moral imperative of environmental stewardship. Photo:\u00a0Wikimedia commons<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

But how does this potential alignment between religion and conservation translate to an urban context? First, urban sacred sites (such as churchyards, mosques, cemeteries) are often rich in biodiversity and provide myriad cultural ecosystem services to urban residents. A recent study<\/a> in Cape Town, South Africa, found that sacred sites functioned as places for rich and meaningful spiritual experiences, and that aesthetic appreciation was correlated with the species richness of woody plants. In many cities, parks and grounds owned by religious organisations are important green infrastructure features. This has led the Christian conservation charity A Rocha to establish a \u201cchurchyard conservation<\/a>\u201d initiative whereby churches are equipped to encourage wildlife onto their grounds.<\/p>\n

\"\"
Churchyards can be important sites for biodiversity within cities. This is a picture of Cloister Garden, Priory Church of the Order of St John of Jerusalem, London. Photo:\u00a0Photo by Julian Osley.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

However, I suggest that religion has potential to go beyond promoting biodiversity in urban churchyards, to contribute to wholesale transformations towards sustainable and flourishing cities. I discussed in a previous blog<\/a> post how connecting urban dwellers to nature might help promote sustainability. I suggest that religion might be another powerful vehicle for transformations personally and at a societal scale. In his study<\/a> titled \u201cDoes religion promote environmental sustainability\u201d, Jens Koehrsen suggested three pathways by which religion might contribute to such a shift. First, religious communities might help \u201cmaterialise\u201d sustainability aspirations through activities like the use of renewable energy or recycling consumables; second, they might campaign for change in the public sphere; and third, they might contribute to the dissemination of values and worldviews that support pro-environmental attitudes and actions. Although Koehnsen did not find strong support for the second and third pathways in his German case studies, I believe these pathways are nonetheless useful for considering how religious organisations might feasibly contribute to sustainable cities.<\/p>\n

These categories align well with the notion of \u201cleverage points\u201d for sustainability transformation, which my coauthors from Leuphana University Lueneburg and I have written about recently<\/a>. Leverage points are places within or attributes of complex systems (e.g. cities) at which interventions can be targeted. These leverage points include parameters (attributes such as amount of green space or amount of energy consumed), structures (the arrangement and behaviour of infrastructures, actors, institutions, etc.) and goals\/paradigms (the underlying drivers of system behaviour such as efficiency, growth, well-being). I would argue that religious groups and faith communities have immense potential to effect change at all these leverage points. Using Koehnsen\u2019s examples, materialising aspirations is about parameters, and includes initiatives to promote biodiversity in churchyards. Campaigning for change is about shifting structures via political means. Disseminating values is related to the goals of the system. It is religion\u2019s capacity to combine all three that gives religious groups so much potential. Faith communities have many members and physical assets, which can be used to promote nature. But they also are characterised by strong social capital, and typically are networked with other communities around the world and with other (religious and secular) organisations in their cities. Finally (and most importantly), they affirm values such as empathy, compassion, justice and generosity, which often radically oppose paradigms such as materialism and consumerism.<\/p>\n

Faith-based engagement and implementation of the New Urban Agenda<\/strong><\/p>\n

The New Urban Agenda, adopted at the United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (Habitat III) in Quito in 2016, will guide international efforts concerning urbanisation for the next 20 years. One key commitment of the New Urban Agenda is to pursue<\/p>\n

\u201cEnvironmental sustainability, by promoting clean energy, sustainable use of land and resources in urban development as well as protecting ecosystems and biodiversity, including adopting healthy lifestyles in harmony with nature; promoting sustainable consumption and production patterns; building urban resilience; reducing disaster risks; and mitigating and adapting to climate change.\u201d(14c)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

To date, there has been virtually no formal engagement with the New Urban Agenda on the part of religious communities. Given the potential for religion to act as a force for sustainability in cities, there is an urgent need to engage faith communities in this pursuit. In November, this is precisely the objective of the first World Urban Campaign Faith-Based Urban Thinkers Campus<\/a>: a forum to facilitate a multi-faith dialogue on the cities we need, in line with the UN New Urban Agenda.<\/p>\n

\"\"
The Faith-Based Urban Thinkers Campus will be held in Singapore from 13-15 November. Photo:\u00a0chuttersnap on Unsplash.com<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The Urban Thinkers Campus will be hosted by the World Evangelical Alliance, along with other organisations such as the Alliance of Religions and Conservation. To be held in Singapore from 13-15 November, delegates will come from around the world and represent many faith traditions. Over the course of three days, they will develop supporting statements, commitments and practical action plans for the implementation of the New Urban Agenda. There will be a focus on how religion can help enable Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 11 (sustainable and resilient cities), and how this relates to other SDGs such as eradicating poverty, enhancing health and wellbeing, and working for peace and justice. This meeting is an exciting first step in engaging the potential of religious communities in urban sustainability. Once activated, their contribution has potential to transform the future of urbanisation and embed ecological and spiritual values of nature firmly within cities.<\/p>\n

Chris Ives<\/strong>
\nNottingham<\/p>\n

On The Nature of Cities<\/a><\/p>\n

References<\/strong><\/p>\n[1] McKibbin, \u201cIntroduction\u201d, Daedalus<\/em> 130(4): 1<\/p>\n[1] Tucker and Grim. (2001). Introduction: The Emerging Alliance of World Religions and Ecology, Daedalus<\/em> 130(4):1.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Increasingly, urban nature is viewed not only as a scientific, technological or design issue, but a moral one. The recent TNOC roundtable \u201cEcosystems for everyone\u201d rested on the assumption that provision of and access to ecosystem services and urban nature is a \u201cmoral imperative\u201d. Indeed, Steward Pickett began his contribution with the statement \u201cThe availability […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":83,"featured_media":24952,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[273,298],"tags":[43,104,49,601,586,392,53,90,404],"coauthors":[213],"class_list":["post-24953","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-essay","category-essay-people-and-communitites","tag-awareness","tag-climate-change","tag-communities","tag-culture","tag-faith","tag-justice","tag-stewardship","tag-sustainability","tag-value"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thenatureofcities.com\/TNOC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24953","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thenatureofcities.com\/TNOC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thenatureofcities.com\/TNOC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thenatureofcities.com\/TNOC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/83"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thenatureofcities.com\/TNOC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24953"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.thenatureofcities.com\/TNOC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24953\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thenatureofcities.com\/TNOC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/24952"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thenatureofcities.com\/TNOC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24953"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thenatureofcities.com\/TNOC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24953"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thenatureofcities.com\/TNOC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24953"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thenatureofcities.com\/TNOC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=24953"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}