{"id":48183,"date":"2022-02-25T21:33:37","date_gmt":"2022-02-26T02:33:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thenatureofcities.com\/?p=48183"},"modified":"2022-02-25T21:33:37","modified_gmt":"2022-02-26T02:33:37","slug":"this-changes-everything-new-yorks-environmental-amendment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thenatureofcities.com\/TNOC\/2022\/02\/25\/this-changes-everything-new-yorks-environmental-amendment\/","title":{"rendered":"This Changes Everything: New York\u2019s Environmental Amendment"},"content":{"rendered":"
As the clearly expressed will of the people vis-\u00e0-vis environmental rights, New York City’s Section 19 will both constrain and guide legislative action. The amendment provides a floor below which environmental protections cannot sink, and all laws will have to take account of that environmental floor.<\/blockquote><\/figure>\n

In November 2021, New Yorkers overwhelmingly voted to add an environmental amendment to their state constitution. Section 19<\/a>, which provides that \u201cEach person shall have a right to clean air and water, and a healthful environment,\u201d <\/em>is now part of the New York Bill of Rights (the part of New York\u2019s constitution that defines individual liberties<\/a> and the limits of state power). This language is both sweeping and simple. It guarantees all New Yorkers the constitutional right to live, work, and play in communities that are safe, healthy, and free from harmful environmental conditions. As Steve Englebright, the amendment\u2019s primary sponsor in the state assembly, explained: <\/a>\u00a0\u201cthe right to clean air and clean water and a healthful environment is an elementary part of living in this great state<\/em>.\u201d Just to give some perspective on how momentous this moment is, the last time any state amended its constitution to recognize environmental rights was 1971 when Pennsylvania voters voted overwhelmingly to add Article I, Section 27<\/a> to their constitution.<\/p>\n

The final vote adopting this amendment indicated wide political support for environmental rights\u2014the proposal to add Section 19 to the New York constitution garnered just over 70% support from voters, a greater than 2:1 margin<\/a>. And, before being added to the ballot, the proposed amendment first had to twice pass both houses of the state legislature\u2014something it also did by an overwhelming margin. This amendment clearly and unambiguously reflects the will of the people of New York. In this, New York is part of a broader social consensus on environmental rights across the United States and around the world.<\/p>\n

\"A
Figure from Struggling to Breathe: Asthma, Pollution, and the Fight for Environmental Justice<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

In the Fall of 2021, just before New York adopted its environmental amendment, the United Nations Human Rights Council voted overwhelmingly to recognize the right to a clean, healthy<\/a>, and sustainable environment as a universal human right. In the Spring of 2022, the UN General Assembly as a whole will consider a similar resolution recognizing the human right to a healthy environment. Appropriately, this vote will take place in the UN\u2019s New York headquarters\u2014bringing environmental rights full circle. The New York City Bar Association has long been a vocal supporter<\/a> of this UN resolution.<\/p>\n

What does it mean to amend the state constitution? <\/strong><\/p>\n

The United States has a federal system in which both states and the national government have constitutions. The federal Constitution\u2019s Bill of Rights, which applies to the states through the 14th<\/sup> Amendment<\/a>, defines the minimum constitutional rights that must be accorded to every person in the United States. While States cannot use their constitutions to deprive individuals of the minimum federally guaranteed rights, they may add additional protections. With this amendment, New York has expanded the fundamental rights of New Yorkers to include the right to a healthy environment.<\/p>\n

When the \u201cforever wild\u201d provision<\/a> was added to the New York constitution in 1894, New York became the first state in the Union to include environmental protection in its state constitution. By enacting Section 19, New York has once again placed itself as the vanguard of green constitutional amendments, but it is far from alone in its embrace of environmental rights. Montana, Pennsylvania, and, to a lesser extent, Hawaii, Massachusetts, and Illinois recognize environmental rights, as do the national constitutions of well over 100 countries<\/a>. The United Nations Human Rights Council recently recognized <\/a>the right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment as a universal human right.<\/p>\n

How will this amendment promote environmental justice? <\/strong><\/p>\n

\"ASection 19 is a clear recognition that environmental rights belong to everyone\u2014that no people and no neighborhoods can be sacrificed on the altar of economic growth.<\/p>\n

By grounding environmental rights in the state constitution, New Yorkers have committed their state to a new path forward\u2014one based on environmental justice. Environmental justice involves both fair treatment and meaningful involvement<\/a> of communities in decisions by which environmental choices are made.<\/p>\n

The constitutional rights enshrined in Section 19 give substantive heft to procedural rights that have long been a part of environmental decision-making under the National Environmental Policy Act<\/a> (NEPA) and the State Environmental Quality Review Act<\/a> (SEQRA.) These existing laws are focused on creating a pathway for public participation in decision-making processes largely in order to prevent \u201cuninformed rather than unwise\u201d<\/a>\u00a0 decisions. By contrast, the substantive environmental rights enshrined in Section 19 put issues of fair treatment\u2014how environmental burdens and benefits are actually distributed\u2014squarely on the table.<\/p>\n

With the adoption of Section 19, the right to clean air, pure water, and a healthy environment are now on equal constitutional footing with the right to property (Art. I, \u00a77), to petition the government (Art I, \u00a79), freedom of religion (Art, I, \u00a73), and freedom of speech (Art. I, \u00a78). Like these other constitutionally-protected fundamental rights, Section 19 delineates self-executing rights (meaning they can be claimed without additional implementing legislation) that the government can neither deny nor infringe. Every person holds these environmental rights by virtue of being in New York, and Section 19 applies whenever state action might impede those rights. It imposes constraints on what <\/em>the government can do vis-\u00e0-vis environmental rights as well as on how <\/em>the government must make decisions. All agencies and local governments will need to ensure their decisions take full account of environmental rights. In short, public officials of all stripes must embed protecting environmental rights into the fabric of all governmental workways.<\/p>\n

Moreover, this amendment shifts the baseline for considering environmental (in)justice. For far too long, New York\u2019s Black communities, communities of color, and low-income communities have borne far more than their fair share of the environmental burdens, with pollution disproportionately and systematically<\/a> impacting their communities. They have had to fight tooth and nail for basic environmental rights. Poor communities, and communities of color, bear the brunt of polluted air, unsafe water, and the growing impacts of climate change.<\/p>\n

Nearly a century ago, structural racism in the form of redlining<\/a> intentionally cut Black and brown communities out of the New Deal and out of the economic prosperity it built. New York compounded this legacy of structural racism by steering most of its polluting infrastructure into these same communities, and then by failing to protect those communities with rigorous environmental enforcement. As a result, a Black child in New York is 42% more likely to have asthma than a white child, eight times<\/a> more likely to be hospitalized for asthma-related ailments, two or three times as likely to miss days of school<\/a> because of asthma. Across the state, Black New Yorkers are nearly four more likely<\/a> to die from asthma-related complications.<\/p>\n

\"A
Figure from the National Asthma Survey\u2014New York State Summary Report<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The same grim disparities hold true for cardiovascular and pulmonary disease, which are also closely related to pollution. Recent studies have shown how increased exposure to pollution heightens the risks<\/a> posed by COVID-19.<\/p>\n

Section 19 must be read in combination with the pre-existing guarantees of equal protection under law and the prohibition of discrimination (Art. I, \u00a711). To fulfill their interrelated constitutional duties of equal protection and respecting environmental rights, all government actors, from courts to legislators and regulators, will have to prioritize protecting the most vulnerable from pollution, degradation, and climate change, and ensuring that environmental burdens are not heaped on already overburdened communities.<\/p>\n

As such, this amendment is a momentous step forward for environmental justice. It provides a context and platform for raising disparate health and environmental outcomes associated with governmental decisions about polluting activities, and for challenging unequal protection under, or enforcement of existing law. It also requires a rethinking of public participation to ensure that those most affected by environmental decisions have a genuine opportunity for meaningful participation in a decision-making process that takes their environmental rights seriously.<\/p>\n

What will this amendment mean in practice?<\/strong><\/p>\n

The challenge will be turning law on the books into change in the world and ensuring that this constitutional change marks the end of business as usual for polluters. If we are successful, Section 19 will mark the beginning of a new era in which human wellbeing and planetary health are the priorities. Nearly a century ago, in New Jersey v. City of New York<\/em><\/a>, <\/em>the United States Supreme Court explicitly found that issuance of a permit could not prevent a court from enjoining conduct that created an environmental nuisance. Much the same way that a permit is not a defense to a claim sounding in nuisance, a permit will similarly not insulate ongoing conduct from constitutional scrutiny. Article 19 thus opens a pathway for reconsidering past governmental decisions that unduly discounted environmental concerns or did not fully value environmental rights. New York now has both the authority and the duty to ensure that environmental rights are respected. For that to happen, behaviors must change in all branches of government.<\/p>\n

Executive Branch<\/strong><\/p>\n

The New York Constitution tasks the Governor with the duty to \u201ctake care that the law be faithfully executed<\/a>.\u201d Article 1, Section 19, now provides a constitutional foundation for all New York\u2019s laws affecting the environment. To faithfully execute the environmental amendments, the state must issue new environmental guidance for interpreting existing law and regulation and will need to enact new regulations designed to promote, protect, and defend environmental rights.<\/p>\n

\"AThe state has an unambiguous mandate to protect New Yorkers\u2019 right to breathe clean air, drink clean water, and live and work in a healthy environment. Everyone exercising governmental authority, including agencies and local government, has an obligation to protect environmental rights, to promote actions designed to preserve and enhance these rights, and to take affirmative steps to provide a healthy environment to all New Yorkers, including intervening when these rights are jeopardized. \u00a0Protecting clean air and water must shape how all state law is interpreted and applied. State actors will have new grounds to justify more rigorous enforcement or to defend state environmental legislation from attack by polluting industry.<\/p>\n

Section 19 also gives states more flexibility to act in response to emerging environmental threats that might not yet be subject to regulation. This will be particularly useful when responding to threats posed by new chemical compounds. For example, had this constitutional amendment been in place earlier, it would have given New York clear grounds to take actions in Hoosick Falls<\/a> to remedy PFAS water contamination once it became clear that the pollution was negatively impacting environmental rights. New York would not have to wait for regulations specifically targeting a particular chemical before holding polluters responsible.<\/p>\n

Perhaps the most sweeping changes will be in how governmental actors conduct environmental impact assessments and\/or consider environmental costs and benefits in decision-making. State actors will need to ensure that their decisions (vis-\u00e0-vis e.g. siting, transportation, development, and permitting) fully respect environmental rights. Section 19 necessitates that agencies and local planning boards strike a new balance when environmental rights and property rights (or economic development proposals) conflict. Where DEC previously interpreted SEQRA<\/a> to allow<\/em> permit denials \u201cif the adverse environmental impacts cannot be favorably balanced against social and economic considerations,\u201d this amendment now puts a thumb on the scale for protecting the environment.<\/p>\n

\"AThe Judiciary must assess whether government action has violated these rights<\/strong><\/p>\n

Section 19 will greatly expand the range of people able to establish standing to bring challenges to government decisions about the environment. Because litigants can now allege that their fundamental constitutional rights have been violated, Section 19 will make it easier to challenge government actions with negative environmental impacts. In particular, the new amendment will facilitate new environmental justice challenges\u2014allowing overburdened communities to allege that governmental action (or inaction in the case of failure to enforce permits) unduly infringes on environmental rights. Under Section 19, a court will have to satisfy itself that a challenged government action adequately protects and respects environmental rights. Where that is not the case, courts can impose the full panoply of equitable remedies that might be needed to ensure that environmental rights are honored.<\/p>\n

Section 19 will also change the way that courts evaluate the adequacy of governmental decision-making processes by which environmental choices are made. As the United States Supreme Court explained in Cleveland Board of Ed v. Loudermill<\/a>, the state definition of fundamental rights like property or liberty give rise to constitutional due process requirements. Once a state creates such an interest (and there is no better way to create than via constitutional amendment), no one can be deprived of their liberty\/property interest without due process of law, nor can it be taken without just compensation. New York must treat environmental rights akin to property rights\u2014deprivation of which can happen only after due process and with just compensation. This principle should serve as a guide to agencies in interpreting their duties under the myriad state laws and regulations.<\/p>\n

The Legislature <\/strong><\/p>\n

As the clearly expressed will of the people vis-\u00e0-vis environmental rights, Section 19 will both constrain and guide legislative action. The amendment provides a floor below which environmental protections cannot sink, and all laws will have to take account of that environmental floor. This will be true for existing law, which may have to be amended to bring it into harmony with Section 19. Going forward, Section 19 offers important guidance to New York\u2019s legislature as it debates a wide range of new legislation across a host of topics including eliminating structural racism, criminal justice reform, public education, transportation and energy needs, housing and development, and climate change. Environmental equity provisions like those built into the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act<\/a> will become the standard for how to move forward with legislation that affects and concerns the environment.<\/p>\n

Rebecca Bratspies<\/strong>
\nNew York<\/p>\n

On The Nature of Cities<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In November 2021, New Yorkers overwhelmingly voted to add an environmental amendment to their state constitution. Section 19, which provides that \u201cEach person shall have a right to clean air and water, and a healthful environment,\u201d is now part of the New York Bill of Rights (the part of New York\u2019s constitution that defines individual […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":23,"featured_media":48191,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[273,1103,298,299],"tags":[43,392,23,405],"coauthors":[123],"class_list":["post-48183","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-essay","category-north-america","category-essay-people-and-communitites","category-essay-place-and-design","tag-awareness","tag-justice","tag-north-america","tag-participationdemocracy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thenatureofcities.com\/TNOC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48183","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thenatureofcities.com\/TNOC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thenatureofcities.com\/TNOC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thenatureofcities.com\/TNOC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/23"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thenatureofcities.com\/TNOC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=48183"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.thenatureofcities.com\/TNOC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48183\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thenatureofcities.com\/TNOC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/48191"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thenatureofcities.com\/TNOC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=48183"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thenatureofcities.com\/TNOC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=48183"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thenatureofcities.com\/TNOC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=48183"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thenatureofcities.com\/TNOC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=48183"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}