Read This! For Every Continent, Must-Read and Continent-Specific Books About Cities

Many voices. Greener cities. Better cities.
Every month we feature a Global Roundtable in which a group of people respond to a specific question in The Nature of Cities.
show/hide list of writers
Hover over a name to see an excerpt of their response…click on the name to see their full response.
AFRICABooks on or directly relevant to urbanism in Africa.
ASIABooks on or directly relevant to urbanism in Asia, from the Middle East to Japan.
AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALANDBooks on or directly relevant to urbanism in Australia and New Zealand.
EUROPEBooks on or directly relevant to urbanism in Europe.
LATIN AMERICABooks on or directly relevant to urbanism in Latin America, from Mexico through South America..
NORTH AMERICABooks on or directly relevant to urbanism in The United States and Canada.
Isabelle Anguelovski, BarcelonaUrbanismo en el Siglo XXI, by Jordi Borja i Seabastiá and Zaida Martínez
Will Allen, Chapel HillGreen Metroplis, by David Owen
Pippin Anderson, Cape TownFynbos: Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation of a Megadiverse Region, Allsopp, N., Colville, J., and Verboom, G.A.(Eds.)
Ana Luisa Artesi, Buenos AiresImágenes del Espacio Público. Paisaje, ciudad y arquitectura, una historia cultural de Buenos Aires. 1880 – 1910, by Mirás Marta
Gina Avlonitis, Cape TownGrowing Together – Thinking & Practice of Urban Nature Conservators, by Bridget Pitt and Therese Boulle
Xuemei Bai, Canberra王如松:《高效、和谐–城市调控原理与方法, Efficiency and Harmony: Principles and methods of urban system regulation and control, by Rusong Wang
Stephan BarthelLiving cities – an anthology in urban environmental history, by Mattias Tegnér and Sven Lilja
Adrian Benepe, New YorkMotherless Brooklyn, by Jonathan Lethem
Nathalie Blanc, ParisThe Book of Disquiet, by Fernando Pessoa
Timothy Bonebrake, Hong KongThe Ecology of a City and its People: The Case of Hong Kong, by S. Boyden, S. Millar, K. Newcombe, and B. O’Neill
Carmen Bouyer, New YorkMannahatta: A Natural History of New York City by Eric Sanderson
Rebecca Bratspies, New YorkThe Death and Life of Great American Cities by Jane Jacobs
Eduardo Brondizio, BloomingtonRainforest Cities: Urbanization, Development, and Globalization of the Brazilian Amazon, by J. Browder and G. Godfrey
Steve Brown, SydneyStories from the Sandstone: Quarantine Inscriptions from Australia’s Immigrant Past, by Peter Hobbins, Ursula K Frederick and Anne Clarke
Lindsay Campbell, New York The Environment and the People in American Cities, 1600s-1900s: Disorder, Inequality, and Social Change, by Dorceta Taylor
Katrine Claassens, Cape TownWelcome to our Hillbrow, by Phaswane Mpe
Lorenzo Chelleri, L’AquilaLa Cittá nella storia d’Europa, by Benevolo Leonardo
Katie Coyne, AustinRubyfruit Jungle, by Rita Mae Brown
Bharat Dahiya, BangkokThe State of Asian Cities 2010/11
PK Das, MumbaiAnil Agarwal Reader, volume-1,2& 3. Pratap Pandey and Sunita Narain (Eds.)
Marcelo de Souza, Rio de Janeiro O espaço dividido: Os dois circuitos da economia urbana dos países subdesenvolvidos, by Milton Santos
Anna Dietzsch, São PauloA Cidade Polifonica – Ensaio sobre a antropologia da comunicação urbana, By Massimo Canevacci
Meredith Dobbie, VictoriaThe Future Eaters: An Ecological History of the Australasian Lands and People, by Tim Flannery
Ian Douglas, ManchesterSustainable Urban Environments: An Ecosystem Approach, Ellen van Bueren, Hein van Bohemen, Laure Itard & Henk Visscher (Editors) 2012
Paul Downton, MelbourneGreen Urbanism Down Under: Learning from Sustainable Communities in Australia, by Timothy Beatley and Peter Newman
Ana Faggi, Buenos AiresPlanificar la Ciudad. Estrategias para intervenir territorios en mutación, by Guillermo Tella
Martha Fajardo, BogotaShaping Terrain: City Building in Latin America 2016 René Davids (Ed.)
Emilio Fantin, BolognaL’architettura del tempo. La città multimediale, by Sandra Bonfiglioli
Richard T. T. Forman, BostonUrban Ecology: Science of Cities, by Richard T. T. Forman
Sheila Foster, New YorkPowerbroker: Robert Moses and the Fall of New York, by Robert Caro
Niki Frantzeskaki, RotterdamNature-Based Solutions to Climate Change Adaptation, Nadja Kabisch, Horst Korn, Jutta Stadler and Aletta Bonn (eds.)
David Goode, BathThe Unnoficial Countrysid, by Richard Mabey
Gary Grant, LondonEcoUrbanismo, by Miguel Ruano
Amy Hahs, BallaratLandprints. Reflections on Place and Landscape, by George Seddon
Haripriya Gundimeda, MumbaiA Place in the Shade: The New Landscaoe and other Essays, by Charles Correa
Fadi Hamdan, BeirutUrban Development in the Muslim World, Hooshang Amirahmadi and Salah El-Shakhs (Eds.)
Steven Handel, New BrunswickA Natural History of New York City, by John Kieran
Ursula K. Heise, Los AngelesNew York 2140, by Kim Stanley Robinson
Mathieu Hélie, MontrealThe Geography of Nowhere, by James Howard Kunstler
Cecilia Herzog, Rio de JaneiroBrasil, Cidades – Alternativas Para a Crise Urbana [in Portuguese], by Hermínia Maricato
Mark Hostetler, GainesvilleThe Green Leap A Primer for Conserving Biodiversity in Subdivision Development, by Mark Hostetler
Mike Houck, PortlandThe Last Landscape, by William H. Whyte
Christian Iaione, RomeEuropean Cities, by Patrick Les Galés
Alpana Jain, DelhiCelebrating Public Spaces of India by Archana Gupta and Anshuman Gupta
Maggie Lin, Hong KongCommunity Design: Reimagining “community”, beyond space, but human connections, by Yamazaki Ryo
Nina-Marie Lister, TorontoThe Granite Garden by Anne Whiston Spirn
Shuaib Lwasa, KampalaUrbanisation, Urbanism and Urbanity in an African City: Home spaces and House Cultures, by Paul Jenkins
Patrick Lydon, SeoulJust Enough: Lessons in Living Green from Traditional Japan, by Azby Brown
Ian MacGregor-Fors, XalapaAportes a la Ecología Urbana de la Ciudad de México [Contributions to the urban ecology of Mexico City], by Eduardo Rapoport and Ismael R. López-Moreno
Anjali Mahendra, DelhiUrbanisation in India: Challenges, Opportunities, and the Way Forward”, by Isher Judge Ahluwalia, Ravi Kanbur and P.K. Mohanty
Mahim Maher, KarachiKarachi: Ordered Disorder and the Struggle for the City, by Laurent Gayer
Jala Makhzoumi, BeirutMuqaddimah, by Ibn Khaldun
François Mancebo, ParisLa Ville san Qualités, by Isaac Joseph
Rob McDonald, WashingtonThe Geography of Nowhere: The Rise and Decline of America’s Man-Made Landscape, by James Howard Kunstler
Juliana Montoya, BogotáLos árboles se toman la ciudad, El proceso de modernización y la transformación del paisaje en Medellín, 1890-1950, by Diego Alejandro Molina Franco
Harini Nagendra, BangaloreFinding Forgotten Cities: How The Indus Civilization Was Discovered by Nayanjot Lahiri
Peter Newman, PerthPlanning Boomtown and Beyond Sharon Biermann, Doina Olaru and Valeria Paul (Eds.)
Charles H. Nilon, ColumbiaFitzgerald: Geography of a Revolution, by William Bunge
Raul Pacheco-Vega, AguascalientesWater and Politics: Clientelism and Reform in Urban Mexico, by Veronica Herrera
Susan Parnell, Cape TownHow to Steal a City, by Crispin Oliver
Daniel Phillips, BangaloreNature in the City: Bengaluru in the Past, Present, and Future, by Harini Nagendra
Steward Pickett, PoughkeepsieThe Nature of Cities: Ecological Visions and the American Urban Professions, 1920-1960, by Light, Jennifer S.
Stephanie Pincetl, Los AngelesNature’s Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West, by William Cronon
Rob Pirani, New YorkNature’s Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West, by William Cronon
Jose Puppim, Rio de JaneroConfidência do Itabirano ( Confidences of an “Itabirano”) A Poem by Carlos Drummond de Andrade
Toby Query, PortlandBlack Faces, White Spaces: Reimagining the relationship of African Americans to the Great Outdoors by Carolyn Finney
Mohan Rao, BangaloreThe New Landscape, by Charles Correa
Debra Roberts, DurbanZoo City, by Lauren Beukes
Mary Rowe, TorontoEmergence: the connect lives of cities, software and ants., by Steven Berlin Johnson
Luis Sandoval, San José Land Use Change in Costa Rica: 1966-2006, as influenced by social, economic, political, and environmental factors, by Joyce, A. T.
Oliver Scheffer, ParisCities and Forms, by Serge Salat
Karen Seto, New HavenNihon No Toshi, by Pradyumna Prasad Karan and Kristin Eileen Stapleton
Huda Shaka, DubaiPlanning Middle Eastern Cities, Yasser Elsheshtawy (Ed.)
Laura Shillington, Managua & MontrealReclaiming Indigenous Planning, Ryan Walker, Ted Jojola and David Natcher (Eds.)
David Simon, Gothenburg Climate Change at the City Scale; Impacts, Mitigation and Adaptation in Cape Town, Anton Cartwright, Susan Parnell, Gregg Oelofse and Sarah Ward (Eds.)
Kobie Brand, Michelle Preen, Thea Buckle, Jessica Kavonic, and Meggan Spires, The State of African Cities 2014: Re-imagining sustainable urban transitions
Keijiro Suzuki, Yamaguchi 神山プロジェクトという可能性(〜地方創生、循環の未来について〜)、NPO法人グリーンバレー(日本語) Possibility of Kamiyama Project (~Regional Revitalization, for the future of sustainability~), by NPO GREEN VALLEY
Jay Valgora, New York Views and Viewmakers of Urban America: Lithographs of Towns and Cities in the United States and Canada, Notes on the Artists and Publishers, and a Union Catalog of Their Work, 1825-1925, by John W. Reps
Chantal van Ham, Brussels Making Urban Nature, by Piet Vollaard, Jacques Vink and Niels de Zwarte
Yolanda van Heezik, Dunedin Tāone tupu ora: Indigenous knowledge and sustainable urban design, Stuart, K., & Thompson-Fawcett, M. (Eds.)
Mike Wells, Bath Nature in Towns and Cities, by David Goode
Diana Wiesner, Bogotá Naturaleza Urbana. plataforma de experiencias, edited by María Angélica Mejía
Pengfei XIE, Beijing 社區設計 by 山崎亮 History of Chinese Urban Planning 中国城市规划史, by Wang Dehua(汪德华)
Lorena Zárate, Mexico CityJueces y conflictos urbanos en América Latina, Antonio Azuela y Miguel Ángel Cancino (Eds.)
David Maddox

About the Writer:
David Maddox

David loves urban spaces and nature. He loves creativity and collaboration. He loves theatre and music. In his life and work he has practiced in all of these as, in various moments, a scientist, a climate change researcher, a land steward, an ecological practitioner, composer, a playwright, a musician, an actor, and a theatre director.

Introduction

In 2016 we  assembled a list of 90 must-reads on cities suggested by a diverse group of TNOC contributors—a nature of cities reader’s digest.

This year we asked 90 TNOC contributors for a single must-read book on urbanism from a specific continent.  From a diverse set of TNOC contributors, we asked: from your world, discipline, or point of view, if a person were interested in urbanism on a particualr continent, what should they read? The book has to be really about that continent, not a general book about urbanism that happens to apply to the continent. For example, Death and Life of Great American Cities certainly is relevant all over, but it isn’t specifically about Asian cities. The people recommending these books are either from the contents they are recommending for, or work there extensively.

The recommendations are as wide-ranging as the TNOC community, from many points of view, and from around the world. They are a reflection of the breadth of thought that cities need, and they speak to the specific and sometimes unique needs of different parts of the world.

What we have created here is a remarkable and diverse reading list. You will likely think of other essential works yourself, and when you do, leave them here as a comment. There is a rich conversation to experience simply by exchanging ideas on great books.

The list below could serve as a wonderful primer for courses or other gatherings. You can download the entire list as a PDF here.

You can download the last year’s global list as a PDF here.

Check out these titles at your local, corner bookstore. But if you choose to buy one of these titles online, please click here to go to Amazon. Some of the sales price will benefit TNOC.

Get busy.

—David Maddox

AFRICA

Gina Avlonitis, Cape Town

Growing Together: Thinking & Practice of Urban Nature Conservators 
by Bridget Pitt & Therese Boulle
2016

This is a beautifully presented book that gives sincere, first-hand, and humanity-filled insights into the successes and failures of community-development-oriented urban nature conservation in Cape Town. Although it isn’t a theoretical book, it does delve into some of the theory of collaborative management while striking a good balance with offerings of practical experience and solutions on a range of topics: from mapping socio-ecological systems to issues of leadership; from collaborative learning to growing community and passion; from ‘putting food on the table’ to issues of buy-in and access. The case studies and experiences may be Cape Town based, but the book is definitely relevant and a valuable resource for anyone wishing to engage in community driven nature conservation in other contexts.
Buy the book.

Pippin Anderson, Cape Town

Fynbos: Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation of a Megadiverse Region
Edited by N. Allsopp, J. Colville, and G.A. Verbose
2014

I was raised academically as a botanist and as a result my go-to text at the start of any project will always be “Fynbos: Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation of a Megadiverse Region”. This is a second edition and follows nicely on from the first, and to my delight the new edition has a chapter that directly  engages with the role of people and even urban form in the Fynbos biome, titled, People, The Cape Floristic Region, and Sustainability. I think as an urban ecologist my starting point is always the original biophysical template and this book is state of the art with respect to explaining the original vegetation type of the region, the underlying soils and the other factors determining the physical environment.
Buy the book.

Kobie Brand, Thea Buckle, Jessica Kavonic, Michelle Preen & Meggan Spires, Cape Town

The State of African Cities 2014: Re-imagining sustainable urban transitions
2014

This report takes an in-depth look at the opportunities and challenges experienced in African cities, and argues for a bold re-imagining of prevailing models in order to steer ongoing transitions towards greater sustainability based on a thorough review of all available options. The report interrogates what innovative responses are possible in response to the already daunting urban challenges faced in Africa, which are being exacerbated by vulnerabilities and threats associated with climate and environmental change.
Buy the book.

Katrine Claassens, Montreal

Welcome to Our Hillbrow: A Novel of Postapartheid South Africa
by Phaswane Mpe
2011

Welcome to our Hillbrow provides a poignant description of life in post-apartheid Hillbrow, a neighbourhood in central Johannesburg. We follow the life of Refentše Morrow, a student living in the dirty and unforgiving but yet always alluring city. The novel could have easily been a pastoral lament, filled as it is with references to Refentše’s rural roots in the village of Tiragalong, but the countryside remains a place of unease offering no real respite from Hillbrow’s gritty realities.
Buy the book.

Nadja Kabisch, Berlin

Urban Vulnerability and Climate Change in Africa: A Multidisciplinary Approach
by Pauleit, St., Coly, A., Fohlmeister, S., Gasparini, P., Jorgensen, G., Kabisch, S., Kombe, W., Lindley, S., Simonis, I., Kumelachew, Y. (Eds.)
2015

This book is a must read because, to my knowledge, it is one of the first that presents very concrete methodological approaches and in-depth strategies on the assessment and on how to deal with climate change and urbanisation induced challenges in an African urban context. This context is in so many dimensions different from the context we know from the western developed world. The most interesting is, that related challenges are addressed in case studies such as Dhar es Salam, Tansanina,  with multi-method approaches, including modelling, GIS techniques but also household questionnaires and qualitative interviews to address not only the challenges for a sustainable urban land development but also social vulnerability.
Buy the book.

Shuaib Lwasa, Kampala

Urbanisation, Urbanism and Urbanity in an African City: Home spaces and House Cultures
by Paul Jenkins
2013

This book is a great piece that highlights the everyday experiences of homemaking and space configuration in peri-urban areas inMaputo. Although it focus on Maputo, the text resonates with many African Cities particularly Sub-Saharan Africa. The book raises the notion of building the city from below and the importance of socio-cultural agency that starts from a non normative perspective about African cities. The book underscores how homemaking is shaped by the social systems and a non-structured system of urban governance in which ideal principles exist but often pushed back by the social cultural uniqueness of the place.
Buy the book.

Susan Parnell, Cape Town

How to Steal a City: The Battle for Nelson Mandela Bay: An Inside Account
by Crispian Oliver
2017

On the imperative of protecting strong and robust local states that can withstand the corrosion of corruption that undermine the public good and the benefit of carefully constructed  municipal capacity designed to protect people and planet under conditions of rapid urbanisation.
Buy the book.

Elisabeth Peyroux, Paris

New Urban Worlds: Inhabiting Dissonant Times
by AbdouMaliq Simone, Edgar Pieterse
2017

It is a very imaginative, thought-provoking book about how to engage with the “make-shift” character of African (and Asian) cities both within and beyond the boundaries of our knowledge. It connects the practices of everyday life and behavior to current forms of “governing the urban”, acknowledging the need to re-describe the cities along a a multiplicity of story lines. It shows how African (and Asian) urban residents address many possible futures at once.
Buy the book.

Debra Roberts, Durban

Zoo City
by Lauren Beukes
2010

It is a science fiction novel that crafts an alternative a view of one of Africa’s most complex and significant cities. It speaks to exclusion and dispossession in defining the quality of urban lives  and the strong links between the human and natural spirit in defining the essence of an African city.
Buy the book.

David Simon, Gothenburg

Climate Change at the City Scale; Impacts, mitigation and adaptation in Cape Town
edited by Anton Cartwright, Susan Parnell, Gregg Oelofse and Sarah Ward
2012

The ever-sharper focus of climate/environmental change impacts and coping strategies in urban areas is still heavily skewed towards wealthy countries and cities as a reflection of available resources, skills and relative prioritisation. Although the balance is shifting, urban Africa remains under studied, particularly since the continent is predicted by the IPCC to be particularly vulnerable to some of the most severe changes by 2100. This book represents a landmark as the first substantive analysis of the current and predicted future impacts, along with how mitigation and adaptation efforts are unfolding, at the scale of a major African metropolis.
Buy the book.

ASIA

Xuemei Bai, Canberra

王如松:《高效、和谐–城市调控原理与方法》, 湖南教育出版社, 1988, 278页.

Efficiency and Harmony: Principles and methods of urban system regulation and control
by Rusong Wang
1988

Rusong Wang is an internationally renowned urban system ecologist, whose work laid the foundation of urban ecology research in China, and influenced and contributed greatly to the theory and practice of eco-city development in China. Although not always highly cited in the English literature, some of the concepts and thoughts presented in this book—e.g., cities as complex social-economic-ecological systems—were inspirational in the 1980s and are cutting edge even today. Nominating this book is also a way to pay tribute to a fine urban scholar and his achievement—he passed away in 2014 at the age of 67.

Timothy Bonebrake, Hong Kong

The Ecology of a City and its People: The Case of Hong Kong
by S. Boyden, S. Millar, K. Newcombe, and B. O’Neill
1981

This is a classic book in urban ecology that examines the city from an ecosystem perspective, with humans as a key and integral component of the ecosystem. In the 35 years since the book was published, Hong Kong has changed dramatically in many ways, including a 40 percent increase in population size and skyrocketing rates of consumption—this book provides a fascinating source of perspective in light of these changes. While some of the specific conclusions may well be unique to Hong Kong, the general patterns are largely applicable to growing cities worldwide.
Buy the book.

Bharat Dahiya, Bangkok

The State of Asian Cities 2010/11

The State of Asian Cities 2010/11 features a comprehensive review of the trends in inclusive and sustainable urban development in the Asia-Pacific region. Being the first-ever report on the state of Asian-Pacific cities prepared by the United Nations, it brings together rich analysis of and policy review on urban demographic, economic, poverty, environmental and governance issues. As Prof. Andrew Kirby, former Editor of Cities journal and its current City Profiles Editor wrote, “[t]he report represents a benchmark against which we could all measure our urban research”.
Download the book.

P.K. Das, Mumbai

Anil Agarwal Reader, Three Volumes
Content editor: Pratap Pandey
Series editor- Sunita Narain.
2007

A must. In 1982 Anil was the founder Director of Centre for Science and Environment (CSE). Although he died in 2002, he established an Institution that continues to drive the environmental message, as loudly and stridently as he would have done.
Buy the book.

Haripriya Gundimeda, Mumbai

A place in the Shade: The New Landscape and other Essays
by Charles Correa
2012

The book offers a wonderful collection of essays on concerns and issues that are fundamental to india and covers several dimensions like 1)  description of the architecture and the cities and the disconnect with people who use them 2) the role of cities in modernizing India: 3) architecture and urbanization in India ; 4) what cities are about and the role of culture. The book also offers some solutions to the modern problems.
Buy the book.

Fadi Hamdan, Beirut

Urban Development in the Muslim World
Edited by Hooshang Amirahmadi and Salah El-Shakhs
1993

A very interesting perspective on the evolvement of some of the historic cities in the Middle and Near East, including Mecca, Delhi, Tehran, Sanaa and various cities in Syria.  The chapters identify various socio-economic and political factors that affected urban development including the spread of Islam, the age of air travel, colonisation and other interesting urban development drivers.  The book also refers to some important North African Cities including Cairo and other Maghreb Cities in Tunisia, Algeria and Morocco and how these are influenced by, and affected, other urban developments in the Middle East.
Buy the book.

Keitaro Ito, Kyushu

The City of the Unseen
by Fumihiko Maki

A book about the structure of Tokyo: its history and topography, and analysis from architectural point of view. It is very interesting and worth reading, especially the discussion about the philosophy of “the depth” in the structure of the city.

Alpana Jain, Delhi

Celebrating Public Spaces of India
by Archana Gupta and Anshuman Gupta
2017

Through examples it gives a very good overview of the importance of public spaces in the Indian cultural context and how they are being trivialised by insensitive urban growth.
Buy the book.

Maggie Lin, Hong Kong

Community Design: Reimagining “community”, beyond space, but human connections
by Yamazaki Ryo

It shares bottom-up urbanism initiatives, from parks design to department store revitalization, to bring the community together and weave the social fabric. A very human-centred approach: 社區設計重新思考社區定義不只設計空間更要設計人與人之間的連結

Patrick Lydon, Osaka

Just Enough: Lessons in Living Green from Traditional Japan
by Azby Brown
2010

Some 400 years ago, Japan was experiencing severe environmental degradation, and the country responded by keeping their borders closed to trade, and learning how to live, build, and think within the ecological means of the land. For two centuries Japan fed, housed, and clothed a population of over 30 million people while simultaneously creating thriving metropolises, market towns, and highly developed arts, crafts, and cuisine. This beautifully illustrated book gives us a peek into the Japanese life and city building during the Edo Period, and helps us imagine how we might again build cities that regenerate the health of the environment instead of degrading it.
Buy the book.

Anjali Mahendra, Delhi

Urbanisation in India: Challenges, Opportunities, and the Way Forward
by Isher Judge Ahluwalia, Ravi Kanbur and P.K. Mohanty
2014

I like it because the chapters offer useful insights and evidence, while covering a rich range of topics related to urbanization in India. The authors comprise a mix of policy makers, researchers and urban practitioners who have worked on these issues for a long time in the country. Finally, based on conversations with colleagues in Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka, I think many challenges of urbanization in India are common across the sub-continent, where  the majority of cities are facing rapid, under-resourced, under-serviced, unmanaged urban growth. Many of the lessons offered in each chapter are thus widely applicable throughout South Asia.
Buy the book.

Mahim Maher, Karachi

Karachi: Ordered Disorder and the Struggle for the City
Laurent Gayer
2014

We were lucky, oh so lucky, to have Laurent Gayer explode onto the scene in 2014. Laurent works at Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique in France, but came to Karachi for several years to do this book, after having learnt Urdu in India. I believe his ability to conduct his interviews in Urdu, often shocking his unsuspecting subject, was the secret to the success of this granular examination of the forces that shape Karachi. Karachi has a rep for being the most violent city in the world (never mind that Oakland and Ciudad Juarez also once had a higher homicide rate). The violence was inexplicable; sure, experts had their theories, but none of them satisfied me. (I was working as the head of the metropolitan pages during some of its most violent years). What Laurent has done is explain “us”. His brilliant theory is “ordered disorder” or managed chaos. He explains why Karachi continues to function while falling apart every day. Best of all, it is a riveting read because he approaches it almost like a journalist and tells the story. Ordered Disorder is essential reading also for anyone who wants to understand the history of modern Karachi, how certain factors have influenced its growth, decay, and resilience, and how we often work “through” violence.
Buy the book.

Jala Mahkzoumi, Beirut

Al Muqaddimah
By Ibn Khaldoun
1377

The book, an introduction to societies of what today comprises the ArabWorld, is outstanding because of the holistic, dynamic methodology devised by Ibn Khaldun that incorporates the multiple layers of cities, religious, political, demographic and ecological, gauging their collective impact on the evolution of the human and physical geographies of these lands and (b) because of his emphasis on ‘asabiyyah’, equivalent to modern day ‘nationalism’, as underlying the political failure of successive cultures of the time. His method and analysis is as valid today as it was seven hundred years ago in deciphering political failures and social injustice that plagues the Arab World. http://www.kitabfijarida.com/pdf/91.pdf
Buy the book.

Harini Nagendra, Bangalore

Finding Forgotten Cities: How The Indus Civilization Was Discovered
by Nayanjot Lahiri
2013

The book tells the fascinating story of the discovery of the Indus valley civilization, including the excavation of the ancient city of Harappa, which boasts of the world’s oldest urban sanitation system. Reading the book, you not only recognize the fundamental importance of archaeology and archival work to understanding cities, but also get deep insights into the mechanisms that shaped the structure and function of ancient cities in the Indian sub-continent.
Buy the book.

Daniel Phillips, Bangalore

Nature in the City: Bengaluru in the Past, Present, and Future
by Harini Nagendra
2016

A beautifully written and accessible compendium of research conducted in “The Garden City” over many years.  Beyond just Bangalore, Nagendra sheds light on the social-ecological complexities that exist broadly across many contemporary Indian cities as they attempt to balance the forces of development with their historical legacies and natural systems.  In contrast to the narratives of loss, doom and gloom that are typically associated with accounts of booming megacities in the global south, this book has a refreshingly optimistic tone, revealing the subliminal forces and relationships that are keeping the notion of Nature alive in the city despite all odds.
Buy the book.

Mohan Rao, Bangalore

The New Landscape
by Charles Correa
1985

First published in 1985, this seminal work unpacks the nature of urbanisation beyond the physical. When I read this as a student, it really was like an epiphany! Mr. Correa brings his enormous scholarship to examine the myriad layers of our cities in a clear and succinct manner. Though the book is rooted in the Indian context, even after 32 years, the book remains relevant to every urban practitioner of the global south. The New Landscape avoids jargon and reaches out even to a lay reader bringing together challenges of shelter, mobility, livelihood, informal economy, market forces, governance, and so on. I continue to refer to this classic and would recommend it highly to anyone interested in urbanism.
Buy the book.

Karen Seto, New Haven

Nihon No Toshi
by Pradyumna Prasad Karan and Kristin Eileen Stapleton
1997

A book about the structure of Tokyo: its history and topography, and analysis from architectural point of view. It is very interesting and worth reading, especially the discussion about the philosophy of “the depth” in the structure of the city.
Buy the book.

Huda Shaka, Dubai

Planning Middle Eastern Cities 
Edited by Yasser Elsheshtawy
2004

The book is one of the first to critically consider the modern history of Arab cities, with chapters written by local practitioners and academics.  It does each of the chosen cities justice by focusing on their unique history and context and by considering multiple (social, economic, environmental, architectural…) dimensions of its development.  The editor also provides a useful lens by which to view the cities and societies in the region and their struggle with modernity.
Buy the book.

Keijiro Suzuki, Yamaguchi

神山プロジェクトという可能性〜地方創生、循環の未来について〜、NPO法人グリーンバレー日本語)
Possibility of Kamiyama Project (~Regional Revitalization, for the future of sustainability~), by NPO GREEN VALLEY (Only in Japanese)

As an artist, I was looking for an ideal environment that sustains artistic activities with least interference by capitalist society. I came across an artist in residence program in “Kamiyama”, Tokushima Prefecture, Japan and I was totally impressed by their community revitalization program by creative individuals. They locate in a rural area but they take advantages of the internet in order to locally live closely with nature and to keep up with the global community.
Buy the book.

Pengfei XIE, Beijing

《社區設計》
by 山崎亮
History of Chinese Urban Planning
《中国城市规划史》
by Prof. Wang Dehua汪德华
Published in Chinese in 2005 by the Southeast University Press东南大学出版社Translated into English: Community Design by Yamazaki Ryo

The book gives a holistic picture of the development of Chinese city planning from the Pre-Qin Period (21th Century B.C.-221 B.C.) to the modern times, with theories and practices of ancient Chinese city planning that had impacted the Asian World, and its evolvement with the influence of modern planning approaches. It helps us to review the original intention of city planning, and to better understand the culture of a city harmonizing man and nature.

AUSTRALIA and NEW ZEALAND

Steve Brown, Sydney

Stories from the Sandstone: Quarantine Inscriptions from Australia’s Immigrant Past
Peter Hobbins, Ursula K Frederick and Anne Clarke
2016

This newly published book is an archaeological-historical investigation of rock inscriptions at Sydney’s former Quarantine Station (1835 – 1979). It charts stories of new arrivals to Australia and the diseases that saw them held at this place for days, weeks, and months. I recommend it for its multiple narratives of the growth of Sydney as an urban, ethnically diverse, and spectacular city from immigration and medical perspectives.
Buy the book.

Meredith Dobbie, Victoria

The Future Eaters: An Ecological History of the Australasian Lands and People
Tim Flannery
2002

If you are interested in the landscapes upon which Australian cities have been created, read The Future Eaters, by Tim Flannery (Grove Press, 2002). Flannery, a renowned Australian environmentalist and zoologist, writes with flair and fascination about the geography of Australia and various processes of change in the landscape wrought by a succession of human settlers, starting with the Aboriginal people more than 40,000 years ago. The book is an oldie now but remains a goodie.
Buy the book.

Paul Downton, Melbourne

Green Urbanism Down Under: Learning from Sustainable Communities in Australia
by Timothy Beatley and Peter Newman
2008

There aren’t many books that deal specifically with Australian urbanism, perhaps because, in this historical bastion of suburbia, the whole idea is a fairly recent discovery. The really worthwhile stuff that’s happening in Australia is in the realm of green urbanism and this 2008 book provides a neat and worthwhile exploration of projects that not only have intrinsic merit but are also selected for their relevance to that other example of a sprawling, gas-guzzling civilisation gone wrong, the USA. Its value isn’t limited to American readers though, not least because the dystopian dreamscapes of fossil-fueled, nature-killing urban form that blight the US have been exported worldwide as models of development, so this is a book that can inform our whole planet of cities with practical examples of how to counter the killing machines of conventional urbanism – although the authors, an American and an Australian, are both much too nice to put it in those terms.
Buy the book.

Amy Kristin Hahs, Ballarat

Landprints: Reflections on Place and Landscape
by George Seddon
1997

This book is a joy to read. Published 20 years ago, but bearing keen insights that remain just as timely and relevant today.  Landprints is as much a celebration of Seddon’s passion for the diversity of Australian landscapes, as it is a critique on the relationships between landscapes, human experiences and how these shape our understanding of place. Essential reading for anyone who wants to examine more deeply the connections between people and the land.
Buy the book.

Peter Newman, Perth

Planning Boomtown and Beyond
Edited by Sharon Biermann, Doina Olaru and Valeria Paul
2016.

Perth has some special books like George Seddon’s Sense of Place written in 1968, which set up planning for the next 50 years and is a brilliant combination of science and literary writing. Planning Boomtown and Beyond has 28 chapters on our city and covers the next 50 years after we realized we are going to be a big city after 400,000 people came here in 7 years during our recent boom. Most stayed as it’s a good city to live in. This book tries to keep it that way.
Buy the book.

Yolanda van Heezik, Dunedin

Tāone tupu ora: Indigenous knowledge and sustainable urban design
by Stuart, K., & Thompson-Fawcett, M. (Eds.).
201

—How can traditional Māori built environments inform contemporary urban development?
—How could Māori values inspire our visions for the 21st century city?
—What can indigenous knowledge tell us about how to create a more sustainable design for the future?

Tāone Tupa Ora suggests answers to these important questions, by bringing together perspectives on a broad range of urban issues, from Māori development to architecture, town planning to strategic growth management. It collects stories of iwi experiences in the 21st century, and suggests principles and theories on which to base change. This book explores indigenous knowledge and sustainable development in New Zealand, reminding us of the importance of connection, respect and the role of spiritual knowledge in understanding how humans have interacted with the land over many centuries. It helps the reader to understand the origin of Māori values and their relationship with the land. It provides a set of principles for preserving culturally significant resources and landscapes to build community identity and participation. It compares Polynesian to European values with respect to housing and site design and shows how indigenous knowledge can be used to bring about sustainable planning and design. The book is easy to read, has useful illustrations and a glossary of Māori terminology.
Buy the book.

EUROPE

Isabelle Anguelovski, Barcelona

Urbanismo en el Siglo XXI
by Jordi Borja i Seabastiá and Zaida Martínez
2004

A critical analysis of the present and future urban development of European cities, through the lens of four Spanish case studies (Barcelona, Madrid, Valencia, and Bilbao). The right to a citizen’s centered urbanism is at the heart of the book and highlights the needs to build cities for people based on their individual and collective rights.
Buy the book.

Stephan Barthel, Stockholm

Living cities – an anthology in urban environmental history
by Mattias Tegnér and Sven Lilja
2010

The Living City is about urban envrinmental history within some European cities and with 4 (hi)stories about Stockholm. A good read—read it to understand how we came up to where we are today.
Buy the book.

Nathalie Blanc, Paris

The Book of Disquiet
by Fernando Pessoa
2010
Translated by Margaret Jull Costa

Not being afraid of being tagged as a nostalgic urban lover, I would argue that Pessoa taught me that to have a good read on cities you needed to feel alive in their midst, meaning to feel powerful emotions, to long for impossible things, precisely because there is nothing there, and to resent yourself for it. You needed to desire what never was, and be dissatisfied at the city’s existence, and feel the potential for utopia. You could feel the numerous flux that impaired, defined the urban spaces and long intimately for them to stop or to be prolonged elsewhere. To paraphrase Pessoa, all these “half-tones of the soul’s consciousness create in us a painful landscape”, but also bond us with the pulsating urban spaces in a long term companionship.
Buy the book.

Lorenzo Chelleri, Barcelona

La Cittá nella storia d’Europa
by Benevolo Leonardo
1993

Not a recent book, but a fascinating account of Europe in the making through the lens of cities history and evolution. An Italian and European centred version of Lewis Mumford. The book was translated into English in 1995.
Buy the book.

Ian Douglas, Manchester

Sustainable Urban Environments: An Ecosystem Approach
Ellen van Bueren, Hein van Bohemen, Laure Itard & Henk Visscher (Editors)
2012

Urban nature provides multi-functional benefits for life in towns and cities, but has to be fitted into the design and management of more sustainable human settlements.  Europe has many examples of carefully planned low-carbon, resource efficient, livable cities that embrace ecosystem thinking, good governance and effective citizen participation.  Holistic thinking about all aspects of urban infrastructure at different scales facilitates better integration of urban nature into the energy, water and materials fluxes  and economic activities of cities.
Buy the book.

Emilio Fantin, Bologna

L’architettura del tempo. La città multimediale
by Sandra Bonfiglioli
1990

I suggest L’architettura del tempo (for those who can read italian). I appreciate the author’s point of view about architecture and urban planning. She has been working for years on the field of urban time policies in Italy. The book gives an overview of the time-oriented research. Since the beginning of the 20th century, time has been at the very core of the philosophical and scientific thinking showing revolutionary results. Sandra Bonfiglioli has extended this revolutionary force to the architecture and urban planning studies.
Buy the book.

Niki Frantzeskaki, Rotterdam

Nature-Based Solutions to Climate Change Adaptation in Urban Areas: Linkages between Science, Policy and Practice
Edited by Nadja Kabisch, Horst Korn, Jutta Stadler, Aletta Bonn (Editors)
2017

With many examples on how nature-based solutions change the urban features and how cities in Europe showcase the benefits to nature and to adapting to climate change. Why to read it? It is about European cities, it is about solutions that provide a brighter future for Europe and exemplify what other medium and large cities can do to enter a pathway for more sustainable and livable urban futures. Simpler: It is a book about solutions not problems.
Buy the book.

David Goode, Bath

The Unofficial Countryside
by Richard Mabey
2010

My choice, published in 1973 by Collins with a new edition by Little Toller Books in 2010, is a seminal work of great significance it demonstrated the boundless capacity of nature to thrive in forgotten corners of towns and cities where a remarkable array of habitats including industrial wasteland, cemeteries, railsides, sewage farms and disused gravel pits support a multitude of species. Mabey turned our perception of town and country on its head.  Though his examples came from personal experience of London the book is relevant in any urban setting. It was a profound milestone and remains a joy to read today.
Buy the book.

Gary Grant, London

Ecourbanismo, Ciudad, Medio Ambiente Y Sostenibilidad, Segunda Edicion (Spanish Edition)
by Miguel Ruano
1998

The case studies are now dated, but this is an important milestone in the process of reconciling the once-conflicting ideologies of ecology and urban design. It has influenced many landscape architects.
Buy the book.

Christian Iaione, Rome

European Cities
by Patrick Les Galés
2002

It’s the most comprehensive but also trustworthy account on how European cities can thrive if they accept the challenge of facing social conflicts in cities through new urban governance approaches.
Buy the book.

François Mancebo, Paris

La Ville sans Qualités (in French)
by Isaac Joseph
1998

Isaac Joseph gives precious insights into how people take ownership of public urban space: In his perspective living in a city is not only residing in it, but also to be constantly re-discovering it, relocating from one place to another, experiencing manifold territories, and finally changing oneself as well as transforming the city itself.
Buy the book.

Olivier Scheffer, Paris

Cities and Forms
by Serge Salat

Cities and Forms is a must-read for anyone interested in the morphogenetic laws of cities
Buy the book.

Chantal van Ham, Brussels

Making Urban Nature
by Piet Vollaard, Jacques Vink  and Niels de Zwarte
2016

Making Urban Nature provides knowledge, guidance, practical advice and inspiring examples on nature-inclusive urban design in European cities. It describes various aspects of ecological design, highlighting many species and biotopes that can be found in cities useful for policy makers, practitioners. The book is of great value to everyone who would like to create space for nature in cities, while improving quality of life, but does not know how to start.
Buy the book.

Mike Wells, Bath

Nature in Towns and Cities
by David Goode
2015

It most beautifully addresses and with passion the nature IN cities and starts at the end to talk about the nature OF them going forward. It rekindles ones love of the former and may start interest in many in the latter.
Buy the book.

LATIN AMERICA

Ana Luisa Artesi, Buenos Aires

Espacio Público en Imágenes. Paisaje, ciudad y arquitectura, una historia cultural de Buenos Aires. 1880 – 1910.
by Mirás Marta,
2013

Este libro es el resultado de la investigación en los registros de imágenes, notas e informes del Buenos Aires de fines del siglo XIX y principios del XX por la Dra. Marta Mirás. Teoría e Imágenes ilustran una era con profundas transiciones sociales, políticas y culturales. A través de sus páginas nos sumergimos en los complejos cambios de la estructura urbana y podemos comprender la evolución de una sociedad, su arquitectura y su paisaje, desde un entorno de aldea rural a una ciudad cosmopolita.
ENGLISH: This book is the result of the research in the image records, notes and reports of the Buenos Aires of the late ninetheen century and early twentieth by Dr. Marta Mirás. Theory and images illustrate an era with deep social, political and cultural transitions. Through its pages we immerse into the complex changes of the urban structure and we can understand the evolution of a society, its architecture and landscape, from a rural village setting to a cosmopolitan city.
Buy the book.

Eduardo Brondizio, Bloomington

Rainforest Cities: Urbanization, Development, and Globalization of the Brazilian Amazon
by J. Browder and G GodFrey
1997

Rainforest cities brought international attention to the urban transformation of the Brazilian Amazon at a time when the conversation was mostly focused on the expansion of cattle ranching and deforestation in the region. Its publication, along with the work of Brazilian scholars, such as that of Berta Becker, spurred a wave of research on rural-urban networks, urban expansion, and the articulation (or disarticulation) of regional urban centers.
Buy the book.

Marcelo de Souza, Rio de Janeiro

O espaço dividido: Os dois circuitos da economia urbana dos países subdesenvolvidos
by Milton Santos
1979

O espaço dividido (“Shared Space”) was published originally in French by Milton Santos, Brazil’s most famous geographer, when he was living exiled in France. The book was later translated into Portuguese and English. This book is not concerned only about Latin American cities or urban problems, but with the so-called ‘two circuits’ of the urban economy of the ‘underdeveloped countries’ (as they were named in the 1960s and 1970s). The theory of the ‘two circuits’ challenged dualisms such as ‘modern’ versus ‘traditional’ on the basis of a dialectical approach that demonstrated how formality and informality are inextricably linked with each other, showing that poverty and informality are ultimately functional and useful in terms of the capitalist economy and reproduction of status quo.
Buy the book.

Anna Dietzsch, São Paulo

A Cidade Polifonia: Ensaio sobre a antropologia da comunicação urbana
by Massimo Canevacci
Studio Nobel, São Paulo
1993

In a very coloquial and creative way, the Italian anthropologist weaves his personal experience in São Paulo with an anthropological reading of the metropolis, placing before our eyes pieces of a puzzle that result in something like and emotional-analysis of the city through the superimposition of readings by Levi Strauss, Walter Benjamin, Italo Calvino and others. It results in one of the best descriptions of this “non-descriptive” megalopolis.
Buy the book.

Ana Faggi, Buenos Aires

Planificar la Ciudad. Estrategias para intervenir territorios en mutación
Planning the City: Strategies to Intervene Territories in Change
by Guillermo Tella,
2014

El Dr. Arq. Guiilermo Tella examina a la ciudad como el espacio en el que la sociedad se reproduce, en el que los asentamientos humanos se expresan. Así mismo se pregunta de qué modo intervenir en estos complejos territorios en constante mutación.  Ofrece estrategias para reconocer procesos de diferenciación de lugares y generar una mayor interacción física entre grupos que comparten el territorio. Con un ejemplo puntual, el de la ciudad de Lobos en la provincia de Buenos Aires, da muestra de que el planteo de la ciudad para todos  más amigable, más saludable y equitativa es posible.
ENGLISH: Dr. Arq. Guiilermo Tella examines the city as the space in which society reproduces itself, in which human settlements express themselves. He also asks himself how to intervene in these complex territories in constant mutation. He offers strategies to recognize differentiation processes of places and to generate greater physical interaction between groups that share the territory. With a specific example, that of the city of Lobos in the province of Buenos Aires, he shows that the approach of a City for All, being more friendly, healthier and equitable is possible.
Buy the book.

Martha Fajardo, Bogotá

Shaping Terrain: City Building in Latin America
by René Davids (Editor)
2016

Shaping Terrain focuses on the ways existing topography has shaped postcolonial urbanism, showing how physical landscape and local ecology influenced human settlement and built form in Latin America since pre-Columbian times.
Buy the book.

Cecilia Herzog, Rio de Janeiro

Brasil, Cidades – Alternativas Para a Crise Urbana
[in Portuguese] by Hermínia Maricato
2011

This book is seminal to understand housing and social challenges that Brazilian cities face. The author has a critical knowledge about urban planning in the country, and she proposes alternatives for inclusive and just cities.
Buy the book.

Ian MacGregor-Fors, Xalapa

Aportes a la Ecología Urbana de la Ciudad de México [Contributions to the urban ecology of Mexico City] by Eduardo Rapoport and Ismael R. López-Moreno
1987

This book is one of the first attempts to understand the ecological complexity of one of the most populated cities across the globe, providing a solid foundation for the currently growing urban ecology movement. From plants to birds, the editors guide readers to get to know the environmental part of such an interestingly complex asphalt jungle.
Buy the book.

Juliana Montoya, Bogotá

Los árboles se toman la ciudad, El proceso de modernización y la transformación del paisaje en Medellín, 1890-1950
by Diego Alejandro Molina Franco
2015

A través de este libro, se puede comprender el proceso de la modernización de la ciudad de Medellín a través de las posturas y percepciones de ese momento frente a los árboles, desde la experimentación, simbolismo, adaptaciones y la ornamentación vegetal típicos de esa epoca. Este libro es la construcción de lo que conocemos hoy como la naturaleza de la ciudad de Medellín. http://www.universocentro.com/ExclusivoWeb/ImpresosLocales/Losarbolesetomanlaciudad.aspx
Buy the book.

José Puppim, Rio de Janeiro

Confidência do  Itabirano (Confidences of an “Itabirano”)

A poem from Carlos Drummond de Andrade, Brazil’s best poet, written in his 1940’s book Sentimento do Mundo (The Feeling of the World) with his feelings about the changes in the world, including his home town. This is one of my favorites poems. The poem is about the landscape changes since his childhood in Itabira, his home town in the State of Minas Gerais, due to iron ore mining (Itabira is home of one of the iron ore’s largest mines operated by Vale, a Brazilian mining company that caused the worst environmental tragedy in Brazil in 2015). The poem, allied to the recent tragedy, shows that development aiming at short term lead to long term problems.
Read the poem here.
Buy the book.

Raul Pacheco-Vega, Aguascalientes

Water and Politics: Clientelism and Reform in Urban Mexico
by Veronica Herrera

In Water and Politics, Herrera analyzes the politics of urban water provisioning in eight Mexican cities. Undertaking extensive (2.5 years) fieldwork, Herrera shows how politicians manipulate water provision in cities for electoral gain. Through in-depth interviews and process tracing techniques, Veronica Herrera demonstrates that elites are able to manipulate how water is governed in cities. Even more importantly, Herrera’s insights can be translated to other Latin American countries and sub-national contexts.
Buy the book.

Luis Sandoval, San José

Land Use Change in Costa Rica: 1966-2006, as influenced by social, economic, political, and environmental factors
by Joyce, A. T.
2006

This book is a very good introduction on how the land use change over a 40 year period in a tropical country after population growth. Additionally, the book makes comparisons between different ecosystems and elevations showing how the land use change is not equally distributed throughout different ecosystems.
Buy the book.

Diana Wiesner, Bogotá

Naturaleza Urbana. plataforma de experiencias
edited by María Angélica Mejía
2016

Es necesario contemplar las acciones concretas de la Ciudadanía respecto al cuestionamiento del papel de la naturaleza en la ciudad. Los gobiernos locales subestiman el poder de la acción ciudadana. Uno de los potenciales más poderosos es la capacidad que puede tener una complicidad público privada para una gestión efectiva de la biodiversidad en la transformación positiva de las ciudades. Este libro se logró gracias a la participación de más de 80 casos en diversos lugares de Colombia.
The Spanish version of the book can be downloaded hereAlso available in English.

Lorena Zárate, Mexico City

Jueces y conflictos urbanos en América Latina
by Antonio Azuela y Miguel Ángel Cancino (Coordinadores)
2014

Almost by definition, urban means high levels of complexity and conflict. What are the tools that different social actors (citizens, communities and activists, professionals, academics, public officials, legislators, lawyers and judges) have at hand to deal with them? What are the gaps, contradictions and overlapping between the approaches from social sciences, domestic regulations and international human rights commitments? This book presents a fascinating collage of a relevant current debate about the urban transformation in many Latin American countries and the role of law in creating more just and inclusive cities.
Buy the book.

NORTH AMERICA (not including Mexico)

Will Allen, Chapel Hill

Green Metropolis: Why Living Smaller, Living Closer, and Driving Less Are the Keys to Sustainability
by David Owen
2010

I liked this book, because it kind of turns environmentalism on its head. Compact urban centers actually are the most environmentally friendly option for people and nature, and this book makes a great case for that.
Buy the book.

Adrian Benepe, New York

Motherless Brooklyn
By Jonathan Lethem
2000

It is set in and summons up the pre-gentrification Downtown Brooklyn and Gowanus, it all its gritty glory  It features an unlikely protagonist, one of the most memorable private detectives in the business, Lionell Essrog, who is afflicted with Tourette Syndrome, and can’t halt either nerves tics or a steady stream of involuntary, hilarious obscenity.
Buy the book.

Carmen Bouyer, New York

Mannahatta: A Natural History of New York City
by EricSanderson
2013

Mannahatta has introduced me to New York City like no other book did. I discovered the very poetic of this place through understanding its ancient forests, groves, rivers, creeks and the widely divers fauna of fishes, mammals and birds migrating through it, at sea, on the land, and in the air, like I just did myself, flying to this new land. In fact, I think every city needs its Mannahatta project, to excavate the wisdom of the land upon which the cities are built, and let it inform how to regenerate and expand its organic forms in the cities of tomorrow.
Buy the book.

Rebecca Bratspies, New York

The Death and Life of Great American Cities
by Jane Jacobs
1961

This book is a timeless love letter to great cities and urban life. It provides a critical reminder of the law of unintended consequences, and a cautionary tale for why theories, especially theories about urban environments must always be reality tested.
Buy the book.

Lindsay Campbell, New York

The Environment and the People in American Cities, 1600s-1900s: Disorder, Inequality, and Social Change
by Dorceta Taylor

This book covers a long historical arc, from 1600-1900, focusing on the development of the urban environment and urban environmentalism.  Taylor draws attention to activism, community organizing, reformers, and environmental justice work. She examines persistent environmental inequities and conflicts that shape our urban realm, as well as the role of residents, particularly communities of color, in transforming these systems.
Buy the book.

Katie Coyne, Austin

Rubyfruit Jungle
by Rita Mae Brown

What is urbanism? Rather than speak of a collective version of urbanism – my version is one that thrives on connections between people and place and is focused on the intersectional opportunities design and planning provides. My intersectional identity is a driving factor in my evolving understanding of systems thinking – a concept central to my urban ecology work. I read Rubyfruit Jungle when I was an undergraduate student. It tells a nitty gritty story of my foremothers and chronicles the social dynamic of growing up a lesbian in Florida in the 1970s, the initial escape to higher education (which just so happens to be at my alma mater), and the eventual journey to the “big city” in a time when migration to urban life was common when the anonymity it provided was of more relevance to queer physical safety and long term happiness. This book offered me a window into a historic (and still ongoing) reality of systemic discrimination against people like me and gave me perspective on the cultural importance of urban spaces today.
Buy the book.

Sarah Dooling, Austin

The Odd Woman and the City: A Memoir
by Vivian Gornick
2016

Gornick’s memior is located in New York City, and she described how the city became part of her sense of self and the friendships she shares with other New Yorkers. Loneliness, emotional connectivity, the power of space to create containers for life experiences are the main themes. New York emerges as protagnoist, changing physically and socially, as Gornick’s incisive commentary about urban life and the friendships she sustains as she ages intersects with descriptions of urban change more broadly.
Buy the book.

Richard T.T. Forman, Boston

Urban Ecology: Science of Cities
by Richard T. T. Forman
2014

For thirty years pioneering ecologists have explored urban areas, both as a promising scientific frontier and as places crying out for improvement.  Urban Ecology: Science of Cities, the first comprehensive book on the subject, was a finalist for the Society of Biology (London) Book Award and now a Chinese Edition strategically spreads the book’s messages. Dig into the pages, and gain a new vision of life today and tomorrow, with and without nature, for most of us on Earth.
Buy the book.

Sheila Foster, New York

The Power Broker: Robert Moses and the Fall of New York
by Robert Caro
1975

The Powerbroker is the ultimate introduction to understanding the semi- public, semi-private nature of city building in the United States.  The story of Robert Moses, a bureaucrat who oversaw numerous public authorities and massive amounts of public funding while mobilizing the private and nonprofit sectors, is an instructive but cautionary tale of urban resurgence and subsequent urban decline.  It is a revealing and riveting read about how power works in U.S. cities which remains quite relevant today.
Buy the book.

Mathieu Hélie, Montreal

The Geography of Nowhere: The Rise and Decline of America’s Man-Made Landscape
by James Howard Kunstler
1993

The Geography of Nowhere presents the  real outcome of the utopian ideals of modernist suburbanization as a tragedy, and its eventual metamorphosis into the driving economic engine of all America as a doomed project. It is a prophetic book that future generations will study to attempt to understand the confusing origins of their landscape as they struggle to repair it.
Buy the book.

Steven Handel, New Brunswick

A Natural History of New York City
by John Kieran

John Kieran’s classic 1959 book discusses simply but in detail the vast natural resources and biodiversity of the city to which  most residents are totally blind.  New York is the largest metropolitan area in North America, but even there the pockets of habitat that remain, many “degraded” to a naturalist’s eye, harbor thousands of species and vary in character from marine coast to rocky upland crevices.  The book forces us to rethink the dichotomy between “nature there, city here”  into “nature is all around us; Broadway is alive.”  And if NYC is alive, what about all those other North American cities??
Buy the book.

Ursula K. Heise, Los Angeles

New York 2140
Kim Stanley Robinson
2017

Robinson’s most recent science fiction novel delivers a lively portrait of a still vibrant Manhattan that’s been hit by 50 feet of sea level rise by the year 2140. Buildings collapse, and others rise up. Real estate speculation still exists, Wall Street still exists, Internet celebrities still ply their trade: and the need for social and economic reform also continues, and triggers a surprising turn in the plot.
Buy the book.

Mark Hostetler, Gainesville

The Green Leap: A Primer for Conserving Biodiversity in Subdivision Development
by Mark Hostetler
2012

I think this book is an easy read for interested folks wanting to shift conventional development to alternative development that conserves biodiversity. Targeting many urban decision makers, including developers, environmental consultants, city planners, and the public, this book gives examples and strategies to create functional conservation developments. It explains the challenges and solutions during the design, construction, and postconstruction phases of development that is required to conserve biodiversity.
Buy the book.

Mike Houck, Portland

The Last Landscape
by William H. Whyte
1970

Whyte builds a rationale for protecting natural landscapes at the local, city and regional scales based on their importance to human health, ecological sustainability, economic health and quality of life.  He traces the evolution of open space planning in the U. S. and builds a solid case for regional planning.  While written in the 1960s The Last Landscape is even more relevant today in the face of the need for mitigating and adapting to climate change by making the case for integration of natural systems, what today we refer to as natural and built green infrastructure into the urban landscape.
Buy the book.

Nina-Marie Lister, Toronto

The Granite Garden: Urban Nature And Human Design
by Anne Whiston Spirn
1984

A classic, beautifully written and illustrated, one of the first books to effectively link landscape, ecology and urban infrastructure. As a landscape architect, Anne Spirn reveals how making legible landscape and ecological functions can lead to nature-based solutions that remediate and heal environmental problems of the city.
Buy the book.

Rob McDonald, Washington

The Geography of Nowhere: The Rise and Decline of America’s Man-Made Landscape
by James Howard Kunstler
1993

What I love about this book is that it centers its critique of suburbia around the idea of the common good, and of what kind of world we want to live in. As I research and advocate for more natural infrastructure in cities, as part of the agenda of making them thriving places to live, I find this frame really powerful. We are creating the cities of the future, now, and Kunstler reminds us it is a moral choice, a choice that shows what we truly value.
Buy the book.

Charles H. Nilon, Columbia

Fitzgerald: Geography of a Revolution
Bunge, William.  1971
2011

William Bunge was an urban geographer who during his years as professor at Wayne State University developed an intensive study of the one square mile Fitzgerald neighborhood.  The project was part of the  Detroit Geographical Expedition and Institute, an extension course offered to inner city Detroit residents. The study was designed to be a study conducted by Fitzgerald residents to inform the about where they live and also to meet their needs in changing their neighborhood and city.  The book is a product of that study and in current urban ecology terms it is a study of a complex social-ecological system.  It combines physical geography, ecology, urban history, urban sociology and urban planning.   However the book is much because it illustrates the power and potential of urban residents designing and conducting a study of where they live.  It also has an optimistic tone that values the inner city and its residents that is missing from much of the current literature on the ecology of cities.
Buy the book.

Steward Pickett, Poughkeepsie

The Nature of Cities: Ecological Visions and the American Urban Professions, 1920-1960
Jennifer S. Light
2009

This book is important to me because it uses rigorous historical analysis to examine how ecology was (mis)used as a metaphor by the Chicago School of urban sociology in the 1920s, and how the misunderstandings resonated in policy well into the 1960s. It is also important for reminding us that not only social sciences and urban planning are key bridge professional links for ecology, but also that the real estate industry is key causal factor in the shape of urban areas and, hence, their ecology.
Buy the book.

Rob Pirani, New York

Nature’s Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West
by William Cronon
1992

Cronon’s opus shows how urbanization, landscape and economy combined to shape the “City of Broad Shoulders” and the settlement of the continent.  It is a  richly detailed trove of urban environmental history as well as a great testament to the importance of regionalism in shaping cities and nature.
Buy the book.

Toby Query, Portland

Black Faces, White Spaces: Reimagining the relationship of African Americans to the Great Outdoors
by Carolyn Finney
2014

Finney provides a personal and academic history of race and the environment (focusing on African Americans and whites) in the U.S. Although not focused on cities, this book highlights the need for the inclusion of the diversity of cultures and histories when advocating for and designing public space.  As a manager of urban greenspaces, I think it’s essential reading for people that want to create just and equitable environments, in the woods or the urban core.
Buy the book.

Stephanie Pincetl, Los Angeles

Nature’s Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West
by William Cronon
1992

Cronon explains how cities emerge from their landscapes and then harness and capture those landscapes to further their development.  He further explains how Chicago, in the case, and the emerge of the railroad, rationalise the landscape and lead to a deep transformation of space and time. Chicago’s development, intertwined with the rise of the railroad, transformed a good part of the great plains and corresponding livelihoods.  The book provided a new way of thinking about cities and landscapes.
Buy the book.

Mary W. Rowe, Toronto

Emergence: The Connected Lives of Ants, Brains, Cities, and Software
by Steven Johnson
2001

Johnson provides a brilliant analysis of self-organizing systems that occur in nature and in human creations, including cities.
Buy the book.

Laura Shillington, Montreal

Reclaiming Indigenous Planning
edited by Ryan Walker, Ted Jojola and David Natcher
McGill-Queen’s University Press
2013

Why do I think that everyone (involved in planning and urban development) in North America should read this book? Urban planning, as most contributors to Nature of Cities have underscored, is a political process. Conventional urban planning in North America is guided by European understandings of development and cities. Yet while many cities in North America were founded on Indigenous trading sites and villages, they have been developed around the belief that Indigenous peoples do not belong in urban areas. Reclaiming Indigenous Planning challenges the socio-political and ecological foundations of conventional planning, asking the questions: what is being planned, why and for whom? These are critical questions that need to be asked, in particular within the Canadian urban landscape where the Indigenous population is one of the fastest growing urban demographic. As the editors of state in their introduction, the book “calls for more critical understandings of what planning entails and how the ideas and visions of Indigenous communities can best be captured in future planning processes” (p. xix). Reclaiming Indigenous Planning is edited volume with chapters on Canada and the United States as well as Australia and New Zealand. Sections I and II will be of particular interest to urban planners. My favourite chapters are Chapter 3, which discuss planning as a tool for dialogue between Indigenous and settler communities, and Chapter 12, which focuses on the power of statistics in planning – how statistics can be transformative. I would argue that this book should be required reading in urban planning programmes across Canada, the United States, Australia and New Zealand. http://www.mqup.ca/reclaiming-indigenous-planning-products-9780773541948.php
Buy the book.

Jay Valgora, New York

Views and Viewmakers of Urban America: Lithographs of Towns and Cities in the United States and Canada, Notes on the Artists and Publishers, and a Union Catalog of Their Work, 1825-1925
by John W Reps
1986

First, it’s hard to find a book for North America, as one wants to give justice to all the countries of North America, which is difficult for a good book on urbanism (unfortunately). This book at least covers both Canada and the United States.  But more importantly it focuses on evidence rather than theory- and uses a denigrated but highly useful art form (lithographs and aerial views) to tell the story of urbanism in both countries at one of its periods of both greatest expansion and invention.  It focuses equally on large and small cities, illustrating greater interest in ambition, typology, variation, and representation— rather than simply scale.  One of the best.
Buy the book.

 

 

 

 

 

Rebuilding After Hurricane Sandy—A Blueprint for a Better Future for People and Wildlife

Many voices. Greener cities. Better cities.

While I was enjoying my August beach vacation, the federal government was releasing its plan for rebuilding the New York City metro area and the New Jersey shore in the wake of Hurricane Sandy. I grew up in the New Jersey suburbs and spent many summers on the Jersey shore, in some of the very towns hardest hit by that epic storm. So I was pleased to see that the Hurricane Sandy Rebuilding Strategy offers a very thoughtful, albeit incomplete, action plan for helping this region bounce back from the devastation and prepare for the next big storm.

Preparing for the next storm

NWF volunteers spent the day planting native grasses to help rebuild dunes devastated by Hurricane Sandy
NWF volunteers spent the day planting native grasses to help rebuild dunes devastated by Hurricane Sandy
Although there should be no retreat from efforts to reduce the carbon pollution that drives climate change, there is no question that we must also prepare for the inevitable change. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration estimates that sea levels in the NYC metro area will rise at least a half a foot and up to 2.5 feet by mid-century. Because of this inexorable sea level rise, we know with certainty that every major storm that hits the region going forward will push sea water further inland than before. And the tropical storms that fuel this surge are expected to become more frequent and more powerful as the climate warms. Extreme rainfall of every variety is expected to become more intense, worsening flood risk across the region. Arguably the most detailed and farsighted climate change adaptation plan ever produced by the federal government, the Hurricane Sandy Rebuilding Strategy should be of interest to anyone who cares about building cities resilient to intensified floods and storms. And with very substantial funding to fuel the strategy — a roughly $50-billion Sandy relief package approved by Congress in early 2013 plus significant additional public and private dollars — local leaders will be able to move quickly into implementation. Many features of the Strategy merit attention. Here are just a few:

  • Educating people about flood risk and practical steps they can take to reduce that risk.
  • Making science-based analysis of climate risks a part of all project planning.
  • Using insurance and other market forces to reduce building in hazardous locations.
  • For the first time ever, applying climate resiliency principles and guidelines to all federal investments — federal infrastructure construction as well as state and local infrastructure construction using federal dollars.

This last point is especially important. Until now, the many federal actors involved in climate change adaptation have lacked any agreed upon approaches to building climate-resilient communities. Now, every agency charged with investing the billions in Sandy recovery funds will fund only those projects that conform with the best science on preparing for climate change.

Emphasizing green infrastructure

Perhaps most importantly, the new guidelines call for capturing the benefits of nature-based (“green infrastructure”) solutions to protecting communities from intensifying storms and floods. Green infrastructure is defined as including:

  • Protecting communities from storm surge using the natural defenses provided by land and water systems such as wetlands, vegetated sand dunes, and forests.
  • Building stormwater management systems that soak up and store water using natural areas and natural processes.
  • Otherwise integrating natural systems and processes, or engineered systems that mimic natural systems and processes, into infrastructure.

This move by top federal officials to help steer the sizable Sandy investments toward green infrastructure is an exciting sign that the nation is truly beginning to shift away from its historic over-reliance on sea walls, dikes, levees and other “hard infrastructure” flood protection solutions. Although hard infrastructure is warranted in some cases, in many cases it is ineffective in controlling floods and causes extensive damage to wildlife and other natural resources.

Aerial views of the damage caused by Hurricane Sandy to the New Jersey coast (U.S. Air Force photo by Master Sgt. Mark C. Olsen).
Aerial views of the damage caused by Hurricane Sandy to the New Jersey coast. U.S. Air Force photo by Master Sgt. Mark C. Olsen.
Building, protecting and restoring green infrastructure provides significant opportunities to restore wildlife. At the same time, it reduces flood damage to communities, creates open space and recreational opportunities, provides clean water and clean air, reduces the urban heat island effect, and saves taxpayer dollars. For example, the strategy notes how oyster reefs, installed several years ago parallel to the shoreline on Pimlico Sound in North Carolina, have absorbed some of the energy of storm-generated waves and decreased erosion in that region. Oyster reefs are among the many green infrastructure options now under consideration for protecting shorelines in the NYC metro area.

Missing: a wildlife restoration vision

One key flaw in the strategy is its failure to outline any kind of vision for wildlife restoration in the NYC metro area and Jersey shore. In fact, the plant and animals species of the region are barely mentioned. The New York City Parks Department alone has over 10,000 acres of forests, woodlands, freshwater wetlands, and saltwater marshes. Surrounding suburbs are likewise blessed with a diverse array of species and habitats. Historically, the Atlantic flyways teemed with migratory birds and the rivers and estuaries teemed with fish, shellfish, amphibians and reptiles. What part of the region’s rich natural legacy do the people of New York, New Jersey and Connecticut want to bequeath to future generations?

Beach-nesting birds—like these black skimmers—were among the wildlife hit hardest by Hurricane Sandy.
Beach-nesting birds—like these black skimmers—were among the wildlife hit hardest by Hurricane Sandy. Photo by Jack Rogers.
As we embark upon a centuries-long project of redesigning our communities to accommodate sea level rise and intensified floods and storms, how wildlife fits into the puzzle is a key question. When I lived in the NYC metro area, I had the great pleasure of fishing in the Ken Lockwood Gorge of the Raritan River, hiking and fishing in New York’s Catskills Mountains, crabbing down the New Jersey shore, canoeing in the Pine Barrens, and birdwatching in the Dismal Swamp. These interactions with nature shaped my worldview about the interconnectedness of people and wildlife and helped drive me to a life in conservation. I hope that future generations of kids in the region have similar experiences and help lead tomorrow’s conservation movement. By conserving wildlife, we provide those crucial formative nature experiences for kids and families – and we bring back the diversity of life forms that is so essential for healthy and resilient ecosystems.

Integrating wildlife into green infrastructure strategies

Some might argue that the best place for planners to express their wildlife vision is in a wildlife or natural resources plan. But by their inclusion of green infrastructure in their rebuilding plan, the Hurricane Sandy task force implicitly acknowledges that the natural and built environments are so closely intertwined that they must be dealt with holistically. Now local leaders must take the next step and build the wildlife restoration element of the region’s green infrastructure strategies. If they do this, we will end up with abundant wildlife and safer, more vibrant communities.

John Kostyack
National Wildlife Federation

On The Nature of Cities

This post was also published on NWF’s Wildlife Promise blog.

Rebuilding Bosnia and Herzegovina Cities

Many voices. Greener cities. Better cities.
Walking though the Bosnia and Herzegovina and the cities of Trebinje, Mostar, Livno and Bihac stirs up unexpected emotions. These cities reveal glimmers of how a country torn apart by war more than 23 years ago is rebuilding and where it is planting seeds of economic and social hope.
There is a sadness in Bosnia and Herzegovina that will follow me for a long time. Of all the wonders and troubles we have witnessed during our walk through Asia and Europe, the visible signs of this country’s post-war hardships break my heart the most in this multi-year journey.

Our route takes us along mostly rural border areas wrapping around the south and west of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH). It’s hard for me to process the disparate things I see each day. Beautiful mountains with thick pine forests. Warning signs about land mines nailed to trees. Wide open grasslands and lakeside wildlife reserves. Newly constructed houses decorated with flowerpots spilling over with colorful blooms. Facades riddled with bullet holes and houses destroyed by grenades. Villages abandoned by families fleeing war, and memorial stones remembering those who died fighting. Young and old people looking for a way forward.

A road we walked with mountains and grasslands. Photo: Bangkok Barcelona on Foot

The bigger cities of Trebinje, Mostar, Livno and Bihac help soothe the emotional unrest and physical discomfort that overwhelms me during humid summer days and rainy evenings. They offer some perspective that, perhaps, can only be appreciated slowly at three kilometers an hour. These cities reveal glimmers of how a country torn apart by war more than 23 years ago is rebuilding and where it is planting seeds of economic and social hope.

A long awaited arrival

We finally reach the Balkans during the summer of 2018, and walk into Bosnia and Herzegovina on a hot day in August. It’s a milestone I simultaneously wished for and worried about since we set out from Thailand in January 2016.

Being in BiH means we are even closer to Barcelona, and closer to home, a concept that feels more significant after 2.5 years of journeying by foot. But, more than this tangible sense of nearing the end of a goal, BiH, in my mind, has for generations been a place where a reckoning with the ghosts of human tragedies and the need for great healing must one day intersect. I’m anxious about what our footsteps will lead us to see.

Along the banks of the Trebišnjica River in Trebinje. Photo: Bangkok Barcelona on Foot
A stroll in the park along the Una River in Bihac. Photo: Bangkok Barcelona on Foot
Making our way through Livno. Photo: Bangkok Barcelona on Foot

With absolute certainty, I can say our arrival to Bosnia and Herzegovina hits me on a deeply personal level, with Balkan blood shaping some strands of my DNA. I am half Croatian, and since the 1990s when images of war griping former Yugoslav regions flashed on my American television screen, I wanted to know BiH and its people loosely connected to me through veins of history, culture, traditions and distant family memories. Since antiquity, the roads of so many different lives and lifestyles have met in this East-Central European country, this land between worlds, and it made sense to us as we mapped our route that these same roads would gradually link our Asian and European footsteps.

What I didn’t expect, however, was the weight of walking through recovering war zones where we can feel the ethnic, religious and economic discontent simmering below the surface. It also had not occurred to me how it would feel to follow similar roads today’s masses of Asian, Middle East and African immigrants and refugees use to reach England, Germany, or other European Union countries. The impact of these various dynamics made BiH one of the most difficult countries for us to walk.

To lessen the sadness we still have a hard time describing, we meander through some of the country’s bigger southern cities, Trebinje, Mostar, Livno and Bihac, searching for solace in the day-to-day comforts of parks, riverside promenades, markets and coffee shops.

Turning to tourism

Perhaps not surprisingly after months of walking in open spaces and quiet, rural areas with few people, we are a bit deflated to see the throngs of tourists visiting Trebinje and Mostar during August’s peak vacation weeks.

The cities are clearly capitalizing on their proximity to the hyper-tourist seaside city of Dubrovnik across the border in Croatia.

The famous Mostar bridge. Photo: Bangkok Barcelona on Foot

Trebinje serves as base camp for vacationers who want cheaper accommodations than what they would find along the Adriatic coast 30 kilometers away, says a young man who helps his parents sell carpets and manage a holiday apartment while waiting for a call back to his better-paying seaman work.

In its own right, the small city, located in Republika Srpska one of BiH’s two legal entities, has enough things to keep visitors busy for a few days. There’s a pretty historic stone bridge, Serbian-Orthodox churches, and its main square has a market and is filled with restaurants, cafes and bars—essentials for hungry travelers. The dry, yellowed hills circling the city provide a dose of nature and panoramic views. I, however, live the city in a different way. I watch the sun set over the river while I fold our clean laundry, admiring the way the light shimmers on the water and not yet willing to immerse myself into urban distractions.

Walking with many mountain views. Photo: Bangkok Barcelona on Foot
While tourists crowd on Mostar’s famous bridge, we sit near the Neretva River and watch the birds. Photo: Bangkok Barcelona on Foot

About eighty kilometers northwest from Trebinje, Mostar, the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina entity’s economic and cultural hub with approximately 106,000 people and BiH’s fifth largest city, buzzes with day-trippers and bus groups. They crowd onto the reconstructed Ottoman-era “Stari Most” (Old Bridge) that was destroyed in 1993 by Croat military forces during the Croat-Bosniak war. They watch locals dive into the Neretva River and buy kitsch souvenirs that look more Turkish than Balkan from the dozens of shops squeezed on either side of the bridge. We stroll around the old city, and note the number of churches, monasteries, mosques, synagogues and religious-based cemeteries pointing to the historical ideological overlap that has shaped and continues to mold the city. It’s clear, though, that the city’s future heavily depends on tourism; the sheer number of hotels, hostels and apartments available for rent suggests that anyone who has a little bit of money is converting any space they have into rooms for sightseers making rounds from Dubrovnik to Sarajevo, BiH’s capital city further north.

We ponder Trebinje and Mostar’s development models on the strip of beach below the Stari Most, discussing the short and long-term pros and cons of such dependency. We eventually fall silent watching water birds hold their ground as the fast-moving river sweeps around them. How nature fits into cities under construction is far more interesting to us than scouring shelves for Turkish coffee pots and war paraphernalia.

The scars of war

Livno is the next notable town we wander through.

The city is in the Croatian Catholic zone of BiH. We know this because people throughout our BiH walk identify themselves and the cities they live in with both ethnic and religious distinctions. It’s one of the strangest naming encounters we have experienced thus far, but our conversations with various people of different backgrounds and residencies confirm that this dual label appears to be a new normal here. Post-war prejudices divide people into groups, we notice: Serb/Herzegovin Orthodox, Bosniak Muslims and Croatian Catholics. Livno is one of the cities that seems to reinforce the separation.

“The Croatian Catholics have rebuilt their houses. They are starting over, and want to leave memories of the war behind them,” a Croatian Catholic man in his 60s tells us while we wait out a storm. He grew up in a small village not far from Livno and travels from Zadar, Croatia, where he now lives, to take care of a house and garden his family own on the BiH side of the boundary line. “You’ll see this as you walk. About 20-30 kilometers after Livno, you’ll be in the Orthodox area. They haven’t rebuilt their homes yet. There are still bullet holes in their walls.”

We don’t know what to make of this kind of bigotry. It’s narrow-minded, dismissive, and shocking. But, we find ourselves in a state of astonishment as we walk and see first-hand what this man meant.

For a couple days of walking before Livno, we notice the houses and gardens. They are new, nicely painted, two or three-story single-family houses with porches, manicured gardens and fruit trees. There are nicer cars parked in the driveways, and better quality farm equipment.

This superficial affluence, a slightly different variety than we have observed elsewhere, takes on some airs as we enter the city. We see several local joggers and cyclists out exercising along the river, something we haven’t seen very of much of since we entered the Balkans. Women leisurely stroll the pedestrian street during the late morning and men at cafes hurry through their coffees. Kids walk by wearing soccer shirts brandishing the Croatian flag and names of Croatian players.

On the heals of Trebinje and Mostar, our couple hours in Livno give us a sense that BiH has turned a corner and is sort of patching itself together, at least from a rebuilding standpoint.

A few days later that image is erased with big strokes.

As the Zadar man predicted, we start seeing the signs of another reality further up the road. Villages are mostly empty, abandoned and forgotten. Houses are in a precarious state, their rooftops blown away and walls overgrown with vines. Pitted façades tell the story of rounds of bullets fired and forever lodged in the memories of those who still call these buildings homes.

“That’s from the Croat soldiers,” says an old Serb Orthodox woman, pointing towards the gaping hole in the wall near her second floor window. “We don’t have enough money to fix it.” She heads off to gather up her chickens for the night, a brief moment of resignation and frustration shades her smile as she leaves us to sip the Turkish coffee she prepared for us.

A few days further on, we see what hoped we wouldn’t see: Warnings about land mines hidden in the forest and roped off areas near deserted hamlets where teams are meticulously trying to find and detonate them. The lump in our throat that we first had when we saw a similar scene near one of the mountain passes in the Pamir region of Tajikistan returns. We do everything we can to not cry on the side of the road.

For many walking days, I wonder how people can stay in this country and why those who now have lives aboard would come back. I think about the unfairness of it all, and question what will become of BiH and what will happen to the cities and towns and the people who tell us of the limited opportunities and resources they have here. What is the just way to recreate BiH cities and villages, and how will they and the people who live in them conjure up enough resilience, social cohesion and financial support to reach a new plain of equality and livability? I have no answers, and tread forward in an uneasy silence for long stretches of time.

Winter is coming

The heaviness associated with the tragedy of war, human displacement and seeing people struggling to create a viable future sticks with me until Bihac.

Bihac, a predominately Bosniak Muslim city on the banks of the Una River, encapsulates the dilemma many European cities now face. Because of its proximity to Croatia (which is part of the European Union) and, thus, the shortest land route across Croatia to Slovenia (another EU country leading the way towards Austria, Germany and Italy), Bihac has become a holding place for thousands of transitory Asian, African and Middle East immigrants and refugees. People we met along the way and several newspaper reports estimate that anywhere from 4,000 to 10,000 migrants are currently living in grim, makeshift camps and occupying dilapidated, abandoned buildings in and around the city. No one really knows how many migrants are there, but concerns about how they will make it through the cold winter months are mounting. Locals themselves have a hard enough time getting through the winter. The care needed for this amount of homelessness is exponential.

“I’m living in a damp abandoned building. The guys at the hotel let me take a shower in one of the rooms that had to be cleaned,” an Algerian man tells us, coughing sporadically, while slowly sipping the soda we bought him at the hotel’s restaurant. We notice the two uniformed policemen who sit at the table behind us, watching us as they wait for their lunch. “I crossed into Croatia, but the police caught me, ripped up the documents the Bosnian police gave me and smashed my phone. Do you happen to have an extra phone you don’t need? But I know you could also get in trouble for helping me.”

If I did have a phone I could afford to part with, I would give it to him. I offer him a meal instead. He politely declines. We shake hands as we say our farewells, bidding each other safe passage on our respective onward journeys. He fades into the crowd of the many other migrants lingering at cafes, shopping at the supermarket and hanging out in the park near the river.

I feel the injustice, and it shakes me to my core. Lluís and I walk out in the open, on roads where everyone can see us, with passports us that give us the privilege to go almost wherever we want. This Algerian man and people like him, on the run from who knows what they left behind, use their phone’s GPS to track a route through mountains and forests that are home to land mines, wolves and bears. They hide in hope.

We pass over the river. Like in Trebinje, I watch the sun start to drop over the city. I watch the water flow, unaware of the human sadness hugging its banks.

I don’t know exactly where my footsteps will take me next. But, I, too, hold hope. I hope the cities of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the people who live in them will create a way forward that opens doors for all of them.

Jenn Baljko
Bangkok to Barcelona on Foot

On The Nature of Cities

Reclamation and Mining: A Dangerous Fight for Sustainability in the Philippines

Many voices. Greener cities. Better cities.

Campaigning and working for sustainability is a difficult and dangerous job in the Phillipines with very little recourse to legal protection for those fighting for environmental protection.

The Philippines has repeatedly taken blows causing environmental degradation. Last month, a dead whale was found with 40 kilograms of plastic in its stomach. In the same month, Metro Manila experienced a water crisis, affecting millions, and increasing risks in sanitation and waste management. In relation to this, protests have been held to oppose a planned dam that would affect environmentally critical areas and at least 1,500 households. Since last year, Chinese coast guards have harvested giant clams and destroyed hundreds of acres of coral reefs within our own territory, and frustratingly, our government has refused to legally address this. In 2017, at least 41 environmental activists and defenders were killed, including those who protected ancestral lands. The Phillippines country has also remained in the world’s top rankings of countries at risk to climate impacts, and major global polluters of plastic waste.

Campaigning and working for sustainability is a difficult and dangerous job. While the above-mentioned list of challenges already seems burdensome, especially for a developing country, we continue to face environmentally-damaging threats from “done deal” projects between our government and the Chinese government. As an environmental planner, I am very concerned about sustainability of our resources. Let me bring to the table two pressing matters that need more effort on environmental assessments, improved legislation, and inclusive planning.

Reclamation Projects at the Manila Bay

The Manila Bay is an iconic landmark in the capital city, but it has also faced problems, time and again, such as rampant poverty, reclamation for giant commercial estates, and informality that crowds around said estates. As of this writing, there are at least 22 lined up that may affect 20,000 hectares—at least 10% of the bay area. The Philippine Reclamation Authority acknowledges that there will be environmental impacts, and has released statements that reclamation areas will have mitigating systems, but this has gone without presenting environmental impact assessments to the general public. To date, only five impact assessments are available at the Department of Natural Resources Environmental Management Bureau.

The Centre for Environmental Concerns PH, a non-governmental organization, has constantly provided information on the reclamation plans. Maps show impacts on ecosystems, which include affected mudflats and mangroves, habitats of water birds and fish, and coral reefs. The socio-economic sector will also be heavily affected, and this includes issues of livelihood loss for fishermen and displacement.

Source: Center for Environmental Concerns PH

Source: Center for Environmental Concerns PH

During the Second People’s Summit on the Impacts of Reclamation, held 26-27 March 2019, issues concerning the reclamation plans and sentiments of various people’s organizations were discussed. Another pressing matter was the increased risk to hazards that the reclamation projects would bring. Dr. Jay Batongbacal of the University of the Philippines Institute for Maritime Affairs and Law of the Sea discussed how the projects would create raised lands, affect water flow, and potentially cause long floods in already low-lying areas of Manila Bay.

Source: © Dr. Jay Batongbacal

Denuded mountains in Zambales

Source: Google earth

Reclamation and territorial disputes in the West Philippine Sea are hugely controversial matters in the country. Concerns predominantly revolve around the demand and supply of soils for the planned islands.

In 2016, claims were made accusing the Chinese government of extracting Philippine soils from the Zambales mountain range to build artificial islands. Though it was confirmed by a mining corporation that the soils were, indeed, transported to China, the extraction activities from the many mining sites continued, resulting in mountains denuded of trees, and damaged ecosystems. Mining activists have vocally raised concerns on reduced suitable farmlands, health issues (such as asthma and pulmonary diseases), and flood risk. In the same year, Zambales residents filed a petition to the Supreme Court with regard to the Writ of Kalikasan (Environment), but were denied a temporary environmental protection order, and eventually were dismissed, and called moot and academic. In 2018, an appeal for the same case was denied. Earlier this year, in February 2019, the mayor of the municipality in question, who blocked mining operations, was convicted of graft and usurpation of legislative powers.

Source: Google earth

Continuing the fight for sustainability

These two cases—reclamation and mining—are examples of how developing areas struggle with two pressing global issues: environmental sustainability, and at the end of the day, social justice (which does not really stray far from environmental issues).

Planners and urban managers should be at the forefront in recognizing the urgent issues that concern our landscapes and societies. More importantly, standing our ground on planning principles should enable us, and the local governments we work with, to take action. These cases bank on compliance to permits, and legal protection, making destruction of the environment allowable. Projects proceed despite protests and the lack of consultation—or guise of said process, for that matter.

While dangerous politics take the steering wheel, continuing the fight for sustainability would mean looking into understanding “development” beyond the context of economic gain, local planning that is not dependent on compliance, and revisiting legislation that truly protects our natural resources against exploitation.

Ragene Andrea L. Palma
Manila

On The Nature of Cities

A picture of a glass and green building

Redefining Urban Nature for a Carbon-Negative City

Many voices. Greener cities. Better cities.
When we are all more ecologically-empowered citizens of urban ecosystems, we gain the ability and agency to adapt to dynamism in those ecosystems because we are no longer distanced from them.

I frequently ask students, colleagues, practitioners, and fellow ecologists to consider how a city can become more like a forest. I started to do this in 2019 when I (perhaps belatedly!) came to understand that just reducing our carbon emissions ― even to neutral ― is not enough to prevent the most drastic climate change scenarios. In parallel with our emission reductions, we must be increasing our active removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. There are many technological strategies in development to do this, each with its own set of advantages and limitations, and I’m sure these will play a significant role. However, I’m a Nature-based Solutions (NBS) kind of girl so my mind goes to ecology. After all, our planet has already evolved an amazing carbon absorption system called the biosphere.

With a population of over 8 billion and growing (although more and more slowly all the time! The global population growth rate just dipped under 1% for the first time in 2022) and the majority of those people in urban areas, is there an opportunity in all that urban growth to pull a lot of carbon out of the atmosphere and lock it away in cities? While, of course, also cutting the carbon emissions associated with those cities? Hence my question: how can a city become like a forest?

A forest’s carbon sequestration power is driven by photosynthesis and depends on the availability of other potential limiting factors, water and temperature being two biggies on a global scale. The agents of photosynthesis are trees. (This whole analogy could also pertain to a grassland; however, trees create a structure that is more analogous to a city in that it is sheltering to organisms on a human scale.) Via photosynthesis, trees, and other plants draw carbon out of the air and fix it into the material structure of their tissues (biomass). Trees are particularly great at this because they are long-lived and a large proportion of their tissue is composed of wood, which takes a long time to decompose, even after the tree dies. The shorter-lived parts of the tree, the leaves, are shed periodically and these decompose, releasing some of that carbon back into the atmosphere but some of it is also stored in the soil and cycled back into other living things. Trees and other plants also carry out the opposite chemical reaction to photosynthesis ― respiration, in which carbon dioxide is also released back into the atmosphere. Thus, we want to come out on the right side of the photosynthesis-respiration equation; in order to have net carbon removal from the atmosphere, photosynthesis needs to be greater than respiration. A young, growing forest will generally be a net carbon remover, while a mature forest in which growth is slow and trees are dying may be closer to neutral. As seen through this lens, wildfires are especially devastating in the era of climate change because that’s a whole lot of fixed carbon being rapidly returned to the atmosphere.

So, moving on from this little ecology lesson, what would it mean for a city to be like a forest? It would mean that the city actively takes energy from the sun and carbon from the air and converts them into the structure of the city itself. It literally grows itself, or at least it grows its own structural materials. Furthermore, it recycles old structures into materials for new structures. Thus, the city’s buildings are made of biomass.

The closest we come to that now is when we build with wood. Mass timber (also known as cross-laminated timber or CLT) is widely touted as a building material that, with recent innovations in processing and structural design, can reasonably be anticipated to achieve carbon-negative buildings. The problem is that those trees are grown elsewhere, in real forests, and truly sustainable forestry practices cannot supply the growing cities of the world by going all in on mass timber. In order to gain the benefit of the stored carbon in those trees, we need to expand the footprint of the city to include the forest where the trees are grown. In a global carbon budget, this is still a win: the carbon is stored away in buildings for at least some decades, and back in the forest some new trees can grow and take up even more carbon. This, however, is cheating on the concept and the forest (which is far more than trees) loses. The nature of cities has always been to rely heavily on imports of resources from elsewhere and to export large amounts of waste. This has become more and more extreme with larger cities and greater population densities. As we pack more and more people into an area, how do we create room for core ecological processes such as primary production and nutrient cycling? In order for a city to be like a forest, then, it needs to be generating and cycling its own materials. Where and how can this fit within a crowded city?

I suggest that it needs to be incorporated into the very materiality of the city itself. That every space or surface where something can grow should be a place for something to grow. As many readers and writers in this space will no doubt agree, we use the small quantity of unpaved, unbuilt space in dense cities rather poorly on the whole. Where plantings exist, they generally fail to meet the criteria of multifunctionality that the intensity of city life demands. Specifically, in this case, we have taken the “productivity” function of ecosystems outside of the city almost entirely. In ecology, “primary productivity” is literally a measure of carbon sequestration and storage; it is the amount of carbon taken from the atmosphere and turned into plant biomass. Urban forests, with all their benefits and ecosystem services, are not generally managed to yield timber… but they could be. As a result of this lack of a loop-closing mechanism in urban forestry, we miss tremendous opportunities and suffer much expense when trees need to be removed.

In 2020, my city experienced a powerful windstorm in which thousands of trees were blown down. There was really no other option on such short notice, so most of that potentially valuable wood was carted away and turned into wood chips. I have long wanted to see an urban forestry-based reuse enterprise that turns wood from downed or dead trees into other products. (Some cities have this already, but it is far from ubiquitous.) Even more intentionally, for example, bamboo is a plant that grows rapidly, in relatively small spaces and with few nutrients, and generates excellent building materials. It is just as effective at screening a building, attractively highlighting an entrance, and providing strategic shade, as many of the shrubs or other plants we currently use in small spaces. In appropriate climates, it could be intentionally and attractively planted, grown, and harvested throughout the urban environment.

Of course, in a big, dense city, there is just so little land left for growing plants in ways that require access to soil, water, and sunlight. We need to think beyond these conventional systems. Other examples of the potential for “growing” building materials are the bricks made of fungal mycelia and bioplastics made from algae. Both of these have the tremendous benefit of being organisms that consume “waste” of the sort cities produce in abundance and they don’t require all three of the soil/water/sunlight triad. Fungi are decomposers; they feed on our organic wastes to grow their own biomass and they can do it in the dark! When we eat mushrooms, we are eating the “fruiting body” or reproductive structure of the fungus, but the main “body” of the fungus is its mycelium: a vast, dense network of rootlike threads. In the right conditions, the fungal mycelium can be grown within a cast shape, dried, and hardened, thus producing, for example, mycelial “bricks” that may be used as building materials and contain stored carbon.

Algae are photosynthetic proto-plants that require water and light but not soil. They absorb nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) from our wastewater to fuel their growth, thus generating both biomass and purifying water. Algae can also be harvested and used in a variety of materials such as bioplastics. I don’t know if they can be used in a material hard enough to build with, but they can certainly be used in finishing materials such as ceiling tiles. I picture the walls of buildings embedded with clear tubes filled with harvestable algae absorbing light and treating the building’s wastewater. A pioneering example is the BIQ building in Germany, which happens to use its algae to generate energy, but you could easily use them in other ways.

A picture of a glass and green building
BIQ mit Bioreaktorfassade (Am Inselpark 17) auf der IBA Hamburg in Hamburg-Wilhelmsburg
Credit: NordNordWest

If we can rapidly switch to carbon-negative materials, then the new buildings and redevelopment that occur in the next decades can make the critical switch from contributing carbon to the atmosphere (part of the problem) to removing carbon from the atmosphere (part of the solution). We harness carbon drawdown to what is already a relentless economic engine and it takes it from there! In doing so, we also reinvent urban nature, in the sense that daily life of the urban human becomes, in many ways, re-embedded directly within its local ecosystem, even if that doesn’t look like it did in previous millennia (see my previous essay on what that might look like:  https://www.thenatureofcities.com/2019/09/16/smart-vs-green-technology-paradigms-battle-it-out-for-the-future-city/ ).

Some principles for the city-as-forest paradigm:

Ecology and economy both have the same Greek etymology (oikos, meaning “home”). Where we have “waste”, this implies not just an ecological gap/opportunity but an economic one. Although “it’s been said, many times in many ways”, urban waste must become a resource that helps to sustain the city itself, and the least expensive pathways to that transition are often based in nature. The urban ecosystem will not look like a “natural” one, because we have created a completely different kind of environment in cities. But it can be much more of a functional ecosystem than it is now if we change our perception to see the opportunities that exist in the problems that plague cities today.

The city must become more self-sufficient and less dependent on distant resources and imports. This means that all of the space and materiality of the city itself must become “complexified”, that is, multifunctional, dynamic, adaptive, and organic. Surrounding and distant lands and ecosystems must serve more as backup resilience.

Multifunctional and organic systems must be allowed to change, grow, and adapt. This means a certain level of uncertainty over time, calling for flexibility and redundancy in production and supply systems. Our economy currently operates on an expectation of reliable supply and perfect product consistency. This is the biggest challenge to “scaling up” that we encounter in Nature-based Solutions. I confess I don’t have a good answer for this one, except to say that when we are all more ecologically-empowered citizens of urban ecosystems, we gain the ability and agency to adapt to dynamism in those ecosystems because we are no longer distanced from them.

Sarah Hinners
Salt Lake City

On The Nature of Cities

Rediscovering Eco-cities—Is this Possible in the Era of Globalization?

Many voices. Greener cities. Better cities.

Another revolution  the “ecological revolution” is required to go back and live in co-existence with nature.

Recently I have been to Auroville, an experimental universal township in Tamilnadu and Puduchhery of southern India. This was founded in 1968 by Mirra Alfassa known as “The Mother”. Auroville came to be known as a global village, as the prime motive behind this project is to demonstrate that people all over the world can live together in harmony. The project has received the endorsement from the Government of India as well as UNESCO. This village can accommodate a population of around 50,000 in the future. What struck me is the design.

The village area has been divided into three concentric zones. The inner most is the core  is the peace area. The area also has a lake to serve as a ground water recharge area. An adjoining circular area is divided into residential zones comprising 189 hectares, a zone for green industries comprising 109 hectares, an international zone (74 hectares) for a living demonstration of human unity, and a cultural zone (93 hectares) for research and other activities. The outer ring is the green belt, at present comprising 405 hectares, which has been successfully transformed from a wasteland into a green ecosystem. This zone has organic farms, dairies, orchards, etc., is also meant to be a barrier against urban encroachment, and finally meant to offset the human footprint. The village also extensively uses solar energy and has designed the buildings in such a way that they consume less energy.

Source www.auroville.org
Source www.auroville.org

Auroville is categorised as eco-city or sustainable city. Several examples of eco-cities exist in the world. Before the word eco-cities became fashionable in the modern era, India had several such historical examples.

Auroville is remarkably similar to what Kautilya has suggested way back in the fourth century BC on how a town or city should be planned. Kautilya is regarded as the father of political science. First and foremost, unlike the emphasis on GDP, the productive capital, Kautilya clearly recognised the role of forests, water bodies, and mountains etc as frontiers and collective wealth. The arthashastra recognised that waste (pollution) must be disposed in a proper way so as not to affect the environment. Arthashashtra suggests that the city be divided into four concentric circles. The main city is located at the centre and should have perennial source of water. Surrounding this central city are the villages located amidst the mixed land use — pastures, agriculture. Forests for recreation and economic benefits formed the outskirts of the settlement. The forest based industries are suggested to be located adjacent to the forests and settlement area. The forests in wilderness formed the outermost concentric circle and these have to be protected. These forests were occupied by tribes with traditional knowledge and enjoyed de facto rights on the forests.

00007Thus, the importance of cities living in harmony with nature has been emphasised. The ancient Indian science Vastu shastra is entirely devoted to the science of architecture. Vastu shastra is a treatise on architectural planning, construction and design and emphasizes  the right selection of the site given the nature of slope, colour, strength of soil and the direction of the plot. Vastu emphasizes optimal utilization of five elements: earth, water, fire, wind and cosmic space for harmonious living. The key contention is that when we build something we are interacting with the positive and negative forces of nature and it is vital to have a net positive energy flow (called bio flow or Prana).

Depending on the shape of the plot and its size, several plans called Vastu Purusha Mandalas divided into four concentric zones were suggested. The innermost zone is called  Brahmastana, which is the place for total awareness. The next three circles in order represent Daiva (enlightenment), Manushya (consciousness) and Paisacha (grossness) respectively. The Brahmastana is always occupied by a temple or a palace, and the construction is suggested in the second and third zones. The ancient Indian cities of Pataliputra and Takshasila were constructed based on Vaastu principles. The modern Indian cities of Jaipur and Chandigarh and the temple cities of Tirupati and Madurai also follow Vastu principles.

So the history repeats itself. Now we have reinvented the same old philosophy of living in harmony with nature through the name of eco-cities or sustainable cities.

What are the key attributes of eco-cities?  These cities are designed as follows:

1)    Require minimal input from the rest of the world

2)    Transfers minimal externalities to the rest of the world

3)    They produce their own food, water and energy

4)    Rely on using local material and on the natural flow

5)    Have more wilderness and open spaces

6)    Use natural solutions for stabilising micro-climates and use renewable energy sources.

7)    Ideally they are smaller in size requiring less transportation of goods and services

8)    Eliminate all carbon waste

Transforming the existing mega cities into eco-cities may be difficult. However, building new eco-cities is quite possible. If we are successful in building the eco-cities, it is possible to make positive economic, social environmental and ecological impacts.

In this era of high population pressure is it possible to have zero carbon and ecological footprint? There are several cities in the world which are named as “eco-cities”. But do we have some certification process to validate the claims?

The reason why it is important to have this process set up is due to the ambiguity of the term “eco-city”. We live in the era of globalization, which involves goods travelling long distances. The trade happens due to comparative advantage. That is, if a product X costs less in country A than country B due to some natural endowments, it makes sense for countries to trade due to comparative advantage.

Now, if an eco-city limits its production and imports goods from outside the city zone, to whom should we assign the carbon and ecological foot print ? For example, a resident living in eco-city would like to consume apples, Kiwis or Oranges, but which are not grown nearby. He has to import apples, which involves some externalities. To whom should these emissions be attributed to? This may be same for the other materials which are not available locally say rice, wheat, vegetables, etc., or material required for building the eco-city. A resident in an eco-city may have to use textiles or leather goods which are highly polluting. To whom should this pollution be attributed? Are we also assuming that living in eco-city also means changing the consumption patterns?

In fact this is the situation in today’s era of globalization. We cannot think of ourselves as living in a Robinson Crusoe economy — a closed economy with no trade. We need to clarify the ambiguities surrounding the measurement of footprints associated with eco-cities.

Having few eco-cities might not make a very big difference to the world, as they still have to depend on the external world for things other than food, water and energy. However, this is nevertheless a positive change. But if we have several such cities connected with each other, it is probably possible to minimize their carbon foot print and ecological foot print.

Just imaging and designing an eco-city is not sufficient. We also need to change our mindset and attitude. This might require an “ecological revolution” to go back and live in co-existence with nature.

Haripriya Gundimeda
Mumbai

On The Nature of Cities 

Rediscovering Wildness—and Finding the “Wild Man”—in Alaska’s Urban Center

Many voices. Greener cities. Better cities.

I have been getting quite the education on “The Nature of Cities” these past few months, while taking in the perspectives of academics, ecologists, naturalists, architects and urban designers, educators, and conservationists (some contributors wearing several hats). I have been impressed—and at times overwhelmed—by the scope of research, activism, and community programs dedicated to urban nature and our species’ connection to it.

And our place within it.

I had no idea how much work (and play) is going on around the globe, tied to the study and enjoyment of cities’ wild nature. And I suspect that’s true for many others who’ve participated in this blogsite’s commentaries and conversations. Here I will bring the perspective of a nature writer, essayist, and naturalist, who has spent the past couple of decades getting to know, and writing about, his adopted homeland. Like Bob Sallinger (“Souvlaki Coyote and Other Tales of Urban Wildlife”), I strongly believe in the power of story and the necessity of telling stories that recognize, even emphasize, the wild nature of our cities. Here, then, is part of my story.

Though I grew up along the edges of rural Connecticut, I have spent nearly all of my adult life in urban settings: first Lewiston, Maine and Tucson, Arizona (both in the USA, and where I attended college and graduate school, respectively); then the Los Angeles megalopolis, where I somehow survived six years despite never feeling at home; and finally, since 1982, Anchorage, Alaska, the 49th state’s urban center.

Schooled in the geosciences (I got an MS from the University of Arizona), I changed careers in my late twenties and became a journalist, which in turn led me eventually into my current life as a freelance nature writer and activist for both wildlands and wildlife (I explore that evolution in Changing Paths: Travels and Meditations in Alaska’s Arctic Wilderness). It was only after I’d begun to seriously observe and write about Anchorage’s “wild side” in the 1990s that I began to more fully appreciate—and examine—the delights, mysteries, and importance of urban nature. I have written about my adopted hometown’s wild riches in essays and two books (Changing Paths and Living with Wildness) and will use my initial TNOC posting to share some of what I’ve noticed and learned about Anchorage’s wild nature, which has relevance to other discussions presented on this site.

Downtown Anchorage, Alaska. Photo by Bill Sherwonit.

A city of nearly 300,000 people, Alaska’s largest community is rarely lauded for its wild nature or frontier aesthetics. Many rural Alaskans consider Anchorage to be a northern incarnation of Lower 48 excesses. They derisively call the city Los Anchorage, a not-so-subtle comparison to Southern California’s smog-enshrouded, freeway infested, urban-sprawl megalopolis (this description perhaps revealing some of my own prejudices about L.A.). Other Alaskans, including some residents, ridicule Anchorage as Anywhere USA and claim its only saving grace to be its close proximity to “the real Alaska.”

Outsiders—anyone living beyond the state’s borders—have also gotten in their digs. John McPhee took perhaps the most famous swipes at Anchorage in his best seller Coming Into the Country: “Almost all Americans would recognize Anchorage, because Anchorage is that part of any city where the city has burst its seams and extruded Colonel Sanders. It is virtually unrelated to its environment. It has come in on the wind, an American spore. A large cookie cutter brought down on El Paso could lift something like Anchorage into the air.”

Ouch.

Anchorage skyline. Photo by Bill Sherwonit.

The truth stings: Anchorage largely deserved McPhee’s late 1970s jabs. It still merits them and, to some degree, those of rural Alaska critics. Poor municipal planning has led to haphazard development and some mighty ugly architecture. Sections of the city are an appalling mix of malls, fast-food restaurants, boxy discount stores, massive parking lots, and ever-expanding service stations and quick stops. Even now, when the city is in the midst of rewriting its land-use laws to make Anchorage a more livable city, with a higher quality of life, there’s substantial pushback from businesses, development interests, and some politicians (including our mayor), whose credo seems to be “develop, develop, develop,” with little regard for how that development is done. Too many of the country’s mega-chains have heard our politicians’ declaration that Anchorage is “open for business,” turning sections of the city into versions of Miracle Mile. And those of us who care about Anchorage’s wilder aspects are constantly battling efforts that would diminish trails, greenbelts, and parks.

“Coastal Trail” in Anchorage, part of the city’s extensive trail system. Photo by Bill Sherwonit.

Yet for all this laying down of asphalt and mushrooming of boxlike buildings, pockets of wetlands, woodlands, and other wild areas remain scattered throughout our municipality. You just have to know where to look. And to be honest, those areas aren’t hard to find; Anchorage has some wonderfully large parks and a world-class trail system.

Those natural areas sustain a wide diversity of wildlife and native plants: the bowl is seasonal home to some 230

Kincaid Park single track trail, Anchorage. Photo by Bill Sherwonit.

species of birds, five types of Pacific salmon, and 48 different mammals.

Anchorage’s patchwork of greenbelts and forested municipal parks is threaded together by a network of bike trails and walking paths. From Anchorage’s much-beloved Coastal Trail, bicyclists, joggers, and walkers can occasionally spot pods of ghostly white beluga whales, chasing fish through the inlet’s murky waters. Along that trail and others, people may also meet moose, lynx, great-horned owls, black bears, and even the occasionally grizzly. Beyond the Coastal Trail is a state wildlife refuge, a place of surprising wildness and solitude on the city’s western flanks, with sedge flats and mudflats and ponds inhabited in spring and summer by all manner of songbirds, shorebirds and waterfowl, from savannah sparrows to Arctic terns and Sandhill cranes.

Also threading through the bowl are several creeks, which connect hills to lowlands to saltwater. Some are filled in, paved over, or polluted before they reach the inlet, but others

Lesser Sandhill cranes in the Anchorage Coastal Wildlife Refuge. Photo by Susan R. Serna.

are large and pure enough to have natural or rebuilt salmon runs. In Anchorage’s most industrialized section, anglers pull 40-pound king salmon from Ship Creek. The bowl is also rich in lakes and bogs, which serve as important avian nesting grounds. Anchorage, in fact, is the largest U.S. city to support nesting populations of loons. And wolf packs roam the city’s eastern edges, sometimes sneaking into homeowners’ yards to kill domestic fowl or dogs.

Anchorage Coastal Wildlife Refuge stretches for 16 miles south from Anchorage. Photo by Bill Sherwonit.
The boundary of the Anchorage Wildlife Refuge, just south of Anchorage.

Though I’ve resided here since 1982, only since the early nineties have I truly delighted in Anchorage’s greener, wilder side. In part that reflects a gradual shift in desires and priorities: once a newspaper sports reporter tied to newsroom desks and indoor arenas, I’ve metamorphosed into a nature writer who chooses woodland trails and alpine meadows over noisy, sweaty gyms. I now prefer watching birds and bears and spiders to TV sports. And I’ve re-learned the value of paying close attention to my home grounds, something I did as a boy, but somehow forgot in my early adulthood.

I believe my boyhood adventures in The Woods behind my family’s Connecticut home and along the margins of a nearby neighborhood swamp helped establish a deep love and joy for wild nature that, while dampened or misplaced for a while in my late adolescence and early adulthood, would be resurrected after I’d settled in Anchorage. This touches on themes made popular in recent years by Richard Louv (Last Child in the Woods, The Nature Principle), David Sobel (Beyond Ecophobia, Childhood and Nature), and others. And it points to a critical aspect of this “Nature of Cities” movement: the absolutely urgent need for increased connections between children and nature in our cities, especially given the abundant—and growing—evidence that childhood experiences have a huge influence on how we relate to the “natural world” as adults.

Another reason for my new perspective: relocation to the hills on Anchorage’s eastern edge in October 1993. That move, as much as anything, clarified what my friend William calls the “power of place.” From 1982 through 1988, I had lived the mobile life of a renter. Then I became a first-time homeowner. But like my earlier rentals, that cul-de-sac property failed to draw me into the local landscape. Needing solitude or a renewal of spirit, I would invariably go “out there,” to the wildlands beyond Anchorage.

But once settled on the Hillside, that wasn’t necessarily so. I continued to love my forest and mountain walks in Anchorage’s neighboring “backyard wilderness,” Chugach State Park and I certainly relished my longer journeys deep into Alaska’s more remote backcountry. Yet I also began to find joy, surprise, connection, and, yes, even solitude on Anchorage’s Hillside, an area of town that mixes modern suburban neighborhoods with older homesteads on the wooded foothills of the Chugach Mountains.

A moose shares an Anchorage street with human pedestrians and vehicles. Photo by Susan R. Serna.

Everything wild seemed closer on the Hillside: the clouds, the mountains, the animals, the weather. It became easier, somehow, to slip outside at night and star gaze, stand in the eerie light of a full moon, or look for northern lights. Easier to go walking and exploring. Winter comes earlier and stays longer. There’s more snow. More wildlife. More frequent and stronger gales. Born along Alaska’s Gulf Coast, high winds called chinooks come roaring out of the southeast and through the Chugach Mountains, then tumble down the Hillside as warm, dry, turbulent air, in gusts of 50 to 100 mph.

In my new home, all manner of things began to grab my attention in new ways: the chinooks; the pleasing rush of springtime creek water; the winter commutes of ravens, which fly daily between their nighttime roosts in the Chugach Mountains and the scavenging-rich environs of mid- and downtown Anchorage; the spruce bark beetle and its infestation of local forests. Nothing, however, grabbed me as deeply as the neighborhood’s black-capped chickadees, whose bright presence drew me into bird feeding and watching and along the way transformed my world, showed me some of what I had been missing. In a way, they become my teachers.

In the spirit of telling “urban animal stories,” I’ll briefly describe here how chickadees helped deepen my awareness (there’s a more detailed account in Living with Wildness).

My enchantment began on a Saturday morning in 1993, shortly before solstice. Lolling in bed, I glanced outside. And there before me, several black-capped chickadees flitted about a backyard spruce. Inspired by their presence, I placed a bird feeder where it could be easily observed from the dining and living rooms. My first-ever feeder wasn’t much to look at: an old, slightly bent baking pan covered with sunflower seeds.

Nothing happened that first day. But Sunday the chickadees returned. Seated at my dining room table, I watched with delight as a black cap landed on the tray, grabbed a seed, and zoomed to a nearby tree. Then in flashed another. And a third. For each the routine was the same: dart in, look around, peck at the tray, grab a seed, look around some more, and dart back out. Nervous little creatures, full of bright energy, they somehow penetrated the toughened shell of this former sports reporter and touched my heart. I laughed at their antics and felt an all-too-rare childlike fascination.

Stellers jay. Photo by Susan R. Serna.

The chickadees were soon joined by several other songbirds. What started as mere curiosity blossomed over the next few months into a consuming passion. I found myself roaming bookstores in search of birding guides, spontaneously exchanging bird descriptions with a stranger, and purchasing fifty-pound bags of seeds. All of this seemed very strange to a fortysomething guy who had never been intrigued by birds (except for the occasional charismatic raptor) and had previously judged bird watchers to be rather odd sorts. I didn’t know what it meant, except that a door had opened. And I passed through.

Now wherever I am—city, woods, mountains—I invariably notice songbirds and their assorted voices. They’re everywhere, it seems. How did I miss them before? And I wonder what else beckons, that I haven’t yet noticed.

I have since moved from the Hillside back to Anchorage’s lowlands, in a residential neighborhood near the city’s western, coastal border. There’s still plenty of wild nature in my new environs, manifested in moose and fox, merlin and goshawk, chickadee and waxwing, spruce and birch, on and on. The opportunities to encounter wildness and learn more about my homeland are endless. But I can’t emphasize enough that this recognition began with some specific experiences—for instance moving to the Hillside, inviting chickadees to my feeder—that opened my senses to the wild world that surrounds us, wherever we live. Even though I’d been trained (as both scientist and journalist) to notice details, it seems I didn’t naturally tune into, or relish, the city’s wilds, until some aspect of it grabbed my attention in a way that I couldn’t ignore. This is something that I—we—need to remember as we work to increase the awareness of the general public to our cities’ wild side.

•     •     •

In recent years I’ve come to believe strongly that this sense of connection, this love for wild nature, is a crucial part of our humanity, even in the twenty-first century. It’s alive in us when we’re born, no matter where that is. The question, then, is how do we nurture our wildness, rather than subdue and tame it?

Great grey owl. Photo by Susan R. Serna.

In The Abstract Wild, Jack Turner argues that “in many inner cities here in the United States and in the developing world people no longer have a concept of wild nature based on personal experience.” (Many others have made similar observations, including on this blogsite.) I agree wholeheartedly with that. But I also believe it is possible to have “raw visceral contact with wild nature” wherever we live, if we take the time, make the effort, and leave ourselves open to wonder and mystery. Then the challenge becomes: how do we reinforce and encourage this wild awareness in each other, in our children? I don’t have any easy answers. But my life in this far north metropolis and my own discoveries of Anchorage’s wild nature (some of which I’ve shared here) has offered hints of what’s possible.

At first glance, my choice to settle in Anchorage may seem a strange one for someone who claims to be so passionate about the natural world. But in living along the city’s eastern and western edges, I’ve gotten the best of both worlds, natural and man-made (though of course the two are connected). I love the amenities that come with living in an urban center, with its coffee shops and restaurants, movie theaters and Performing Arts Center, universities and libraries and sports programs. Here I’ve found intersecting circles of writers and outdoors enthusiasts and earth- and peace-loving activists. Yet I also have easy access to parks, trails, greenbelts, a coastal refuge, and a nearby mountain range, the Chugach, whose remotest valleys and peaks are seldom visited. And I reside in a landscape also inhabited by chinook and coho, goshawk and owl, coyote and lynx. But again I must emphasize that I only came to this awareness, and appreciation, over time, thanks in large part to teachers who grabbed my attention, chickadees (and bears and frogs) among them.

Living in Anchorage, I’m now constantly reminded that wildness is all around us, all the time, even in the city. It’s just that most of us humans don’t notice the “wild side” of our busy urban lives (some, it’s true, are simply trying to survive their urban lifestyles, which leaves little, if any, opportunities for wild connections), just as I largely didn’t for my first decade of living in Alaska’s urban center. Of course, in many a metropolis you have to look hard to find even hints of the wild behind the elaborate layers of human construct that shield us from the rest of nature. Anchorage’s juxtaposition of malls and moose, brewhouses and bears, or libraries and loons makes it easier to notice urban wildness here than in cities like L.A. or Tucson or even Lewiston, Maine, all places that I’ve lived. This city, more than any other, has opened my eyes and enlarged my awareness of wild nature in a way that even the wilderness couldn’t.

It’s also been here that I’ve come to better understand—through personal experience, research and readings, and shared stories with other friends and colleagues—that we humans do indeed carry wildness within us. We are animals, after all. And though many of our natural instincts are “tamed”—or suppressed—as we grow up, we carry deep within us a wild nature that’s expressed not only in our need to eat, drink, sleep, and procreate, but also in our emotions, dreams, spontaneity, hunting instincts (expressed in a variety of ways), our draw to the outdoors, and the deep aliveness and sense of wonder we sometimes feel when making an unexpected connection with the larger, wilder world we inhabit.

I’ve written about this inner nature in an essay, “In Search of the Wild Man,” included in Living with Wildness. As I discuss in that essay, this inner wild man, or wild woman, or wild child, is an important part of who we are. And it is nourished by connecting with what David Abram (The Spell of the Sensuous) has called more-than-human nature. This—need I say it?—is a good thing, and essential to a deeper, more respectful, and more joyful relationship with our original and primary home, the Earth, and the other inhabitants with whom we share this planet.

All of this can happen, must happen, in our cities.

A few final thoughts, pulled from my essay, “In Search of the Wild Man”:

Only by getting to know wild nature will we learn to embrace and cherish and preserve it, both within ourselves and as manifested in myriad other forms, in the larger, more-than-human world. Such a full embrace is possible, no matter how frightening, because at some deep level, we and all “the others” are part of a larger—and what some would call a sacred—oneness. All of the world’s mystical traditions teach this. Even Christianity maintains that we are all part of the creation: people and trees and hills and butterflies and bacteria. And though it doesn’t normally use words like “sacred” or “holy,” science confirms it too.

Bald eagle on the outskirts of town. Photo by Susan R. Serna.

The good news is that wildness reaches everywhere, from the far wilderness to the innermost pockets of our biggest cities. We can each choose where, in what form, and in what way we get to know the wild. But we must make some effort, if we care at all about healing ourselves, healing the world, keeping things whole. In touching the Wild Man or Wild Woman, we learn to better love the world. And in loving the world, we embrace our own richly wild essence. As I’ve discovered in my own life, it’s not necessarily an easy thing for us modern Homo sapiens to understand or practice. But like Gary Snyder says in The Practice of the Wild, “I for one, will keep working for wildness day by day,” in whatever small way I’m able.

And, I might add here, that I will do so wherever I reside, even—or perhaps especially—in the city.

Bill Sherwonit
Anchorage, Alaska
USA

Reflecting on Two Years Walking in Asia

Many voices. Greener cities. Better cities.
10,500 kilometers by foot has made us advocates for cities that put citizens’ nature-based needs in the center of their urban planning process.

My eyes fall on the big tree in the far side of the courtyard.

It casts a spell on me. Its leafless branches twist toward the sky, claiming a beauty few notice. I notice, and stop mid-step to admire this natural wonder. I take a picture of it so I won’t forget this moment.

Tree love, Istanbul. Photo: J. Baljko

Behind me groups of tourists and school kids rush to see the grandeur of Ottoman wealth in the form of Topkapi Palace, which once housed sultans and harems. Its decorative blue and white tiles, some of which may date back to the 15th Century, have their appeal, and I appreciate their historical importance.

Beyond the walls of the palace-turned-museum, I can hear the tram, and imagine the locals and foreigners weaving around each other on one of Istanbul’s busy commercial streets.

The tree, though, is what has captured all of my attention. After almost two years of walking mostly treeless roads connecting mostly crowded or overcrowded cities, trees, when I see them, get all of my love. Some of them I acknowledge with a nod, others I blow a kiss to, and some I touch as I stroll by. Many trees are so irresistible that I must hug them.

Yes, I’m a tree hugger now.

Tree hugger. Photo: Lluís.

Walking since January 2016 through large swaths of Asia is to blame for my current tree obsession. This foot journey of nearly 10,500 kilometers to date has impacted Lluís and me in ways that we wouldn’t have expected.

Traffic in Bangkok. Photo: J. Baljko

For one, we hug trees in the middle of the street without shame. We loved trees before, but their absence in our day-to-day walking lives—along roads and highways where we can’t escape trucks, buses and cars—has created a hole in our hearts.

We also peek through fences to admire gardens, and stop to watch the birds fly by. We marvel at the colors of flowers blooming and wilting, and freeze-frame pretty buds with our mobile phone cameras.

Small things we notice in cities. Photo: J. Baljko

Everywhere, and especially when we pass through cities, we crave open, green spaces. We find ourselves lingering longer in parks, and skipping the main attractions guidebooks recommend.

Scarred by constant horn honking for seven months of walking in Bangladesh and India and almost two years of walking mostly on asphalt, we desperately seek out quiet places. The profound sound of silence simultaneously takes our breaths away and fills us with life.

Most of the cities we have walked through from Thailand to Turkey have lost their souls, in our humble walkers’ opinion.

They have been designed or redesigned—not usually in a good way—to move cars and trucks through their boundaries. The idea that people may still want to walk around by foot feels like a long-lost impulse.

How do we get through this? Photo: J. Balkjo

In many places, simple things like sidewalks don’t exist, and if they do, they are in no condition to walk on or have been overrun by mopeds, restaurant tables or vendors who sell any sort of thing off the tarp they threw wherever they decided to sit. Parking laws are for “those other people” not the ones who leave their cars any which way they feel like it, and street lights change before a pedestrian can make it the full distance across. Trees have been cut down to make high-rise apartment buildings, park benches are empty, swings are broken, and buses spewing black exhaust hoard around markets and malls making it impossible for anyone get around.

Walking views in Dhaka. Photo: J. Baljko
Marks of the city limits. Photo: J. Baljko

Most of the hundreds of cities and villages we have walked through have disappointed us. They are gritty places, gray from smog and filled with weary faces. We join the weary, and pass through with our heads down and our elbows tucked in to avoid being clipped by a reckless driver. We refill our water bottles, get something to eat and press on, waiting for the next rural stretch where we can breathe easier.

We think out loud about what so many cities we see seem to be missing. Our repeating chain of thought is that many cities surviving alongside roads lack a place where its citizens can step away from the grime, disengage from the urban world around them and momentarily slip into a natural, and much-needed state of stillness.

The idea of finding stillness, noticing silence and enjoying the traces of nature relegated to tiny slivers of cities is very present in our walkers’ minds. These are some of the things we miss terribly walking 10 hours a day in all sorts of weather and cultural conditions.

When we find them, we latch on to them.

That’s why we liked Mashhad, Iran, or Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, or Chandigarh, India, for instance. Mashhad’s parks and brightly painted benches felt inviting. Bishkek’s pedestrian walkways gave us a space to listen to the birds. In Chandigarh, unlike any other city in India, we could actually walk down a tree-lined street and not fear getting swiped by a moped.

 

Hitting the pavement.

10,500 kilometers by foot has made us advocates for cities that put citizens’ nature-based needs in the center of their urban planning process.

We like to think that if city planners and developers walked around their cities and up and down all of their streets for a couple of weeks, they would see what we see.

They would notice when the birds are singing or not singing, and where they are nesting. They would make note of all the cracks on their sidewalks. They would fix the broken swings no child wants to use. They would put in more trash bins and encourage recycling. They would realize they don’t have enough time to get halfway across a big intersection. They would see a rose, and may stop to smell it.

And, they would notice the big tree sharing its quiet beauty, and save it from ruin because, in a single moment of stillness and quiet reflection, they would feel their primal bind to this natural wonder.

Their footsteps would echo louder than the cars and trucks they think matter most.

Jennifer Baljko
Bangkok to Barcelona on Foot

On The Nature of Cities

Reflections on “Laudato Si, On Care For Our Common Home”

Many voices. Greener cities. Better cities.

2 Pope FrancisPope Francis, City Planner

After reading Pope Francis’ Laudato Si, On Care For Our Common Home, I was moved to select references I felt relevant to efforts in Portland to integrate nature into the city and weave nature into the fabric of our urban and urbanizing neighborhoods. I sent a copy to David Maddox, who asked if I would consider adapting those excerpts into a blog for The Nature of Cities. What follows is my effort to do so. The entire text of “On Care for our Common Home” can be found here, in eight languages. It makes for good reading for anyone interested in the nature of cities.

“There is a need to protect those common areas, visual landmarks and urban landscapes which increase our sense of belonging, of rootedness, of ‘feeling at home’ within a city which includes us and brings us together.”—Pope Francis
I was only half-joking when testifying at a recent Portland city council session when I said we could have saved a lot of time and energy in writing our updated comprehensive plan, climate action plan and climate preparation strategies had we received an early draft of Pope Francis’ Laudato Si, On Care For Our Common Home. I was struck by the many parallels, both conceptual and textual, between the Encyclical and our efforts to better integrate nature into the urban context, our responses regarding mitigation and adaptation to climate change, and our efforts to create an ecologically healthy, equitable and resilient city.1 Encyclical cover Crop

2b Charlie Hales Photo Mike Houck DSC_1434
Charlie Hales, Mayor of Portland. Photo: Mike Houck

Quite coincidentally to my reading of the Encyclical, it so happened that our mayor, Charlie Hales, had just received an invitation to attend a papal audience on Climate Change and human trafficking. Hales received his invitation on the strength of the city’s climate action plan, on its reputation for excellence in urban planning, and on President Obama’s 2014 naming of Portland as one of 16 national Climate Action Champions for Leadership on Climate Change. Sixty mayors from around the world were invited to Rome on the heels of a climate change gathering in Vancouver, British Columbia, to address modern slavery and climate change. The papal meeting was sponsored by the pontifical academies of sciences and social sciences.

The leaders were asked to share their city’s best practices, to sign a declaration recognizing that climate change and extreme poverty are influenced by human activity, and to pledge to make their cities “socially inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable.”

So, what do Francis’ writings have to do with “the nature of cities,” ecological and social? A lot. For example, he laments the lack of greenspace under the heading “City Planning,” writing:

Many cities are huge, inefficient structures, excessively wasteful of energy and water. Neighbourhoods, even those recently built, are congested, chaotic and lacking in sufficient green space. We were not meant to be inundated by cement, asphalt, glass and metal, and deprived of physical contact with nature.”

5 Tanner Springs from The Sitka Photo Mike Houck DSC_0248
Tanner Spring Nature Park in the heart of the Pearl District in NW Portland as seen from the Sitka Apartments, a low income housing in one of Portland’s densest neighborhoods. Equity of access to nature, even in the city’s downtown core, is fundamental to creating an equitable and ecologically sustainable city. Photo Mike Houck
4 Burnt Bridge Creek Vancouver celebration Photo Mike Houck
Burnt Bridge Creek Vancouver dedication. Photo: Mike Houck

Within the context of city planning, Francis takes on the privatization of public space and inequitable access to parks and greenspaces, pointing out that wealthy, “ecological” gated communities have the lion’s share of urban parks and greenspaces, while “hidden,” poor neighborhoods—inhabited by what he describes as the “disposable members of society”—have little or no public space.

3 John Charles Olmsted @ Olmsted Archives
John Charles Olmsted, adopted son of Frederick Law Olmsted. The Olmsted firm’s rationale for parks was deeply bedded in social equity and democratizing effect of parks.

Francis makes the same arguments that many in our community have made for decades with regard to special landscapes and the Olmstedian precept that parks are catalysts for increased social cohesion.

He writes:

There is also a need to protect those common areas, visual landmarks and urban landscapes which increase our sense of belonging, of rootedness, of ‘feeling at home’ within a city which includes us and brings us together…Interventions which affect the urban or rural landscape should take into account how various elements combine to form a whole which is perceived by its inhabitants as a coherent and meaningful framework for their lives. Others will then no longer be seen as strangers, but as part of a ‘we’ which all of us are working to create. For this same reason, in both urban and rural settings, it is helpful to set aside some places which can be preserved and protected from constant changes brought by human intervention.”

6 Portland Streetcar ACCESSIBILITY-717083
Portland Streetcar, providing equity of access to city transit systems.

Housing and transit

He also delves into planning issues unrelated to “nature in the city,” but which are consequential to equity in urban development. He identifies lack of housing as “a grave problem in many parts of the world, both in rural areas and in large cities…”

Regarding transit, he writes:

The quality of life in cities has much to do with systems of transport, which are often a source of much suffering for those who use them. Many cars…circulate in cities, causing traffic congestion, raising the level of pollution, and consuming enormous quantities of non-renewable energy. This makes it necessary to build more roads and parking areas which spoil the urban landscape. Many specialists agree on the need to give priority to public transportation. Yet some measures needed will not prove easily acceptable to society unless substantial improvements are made in the systems themselves, which in many cities force people to put up with undignified conditions due to crowding, inconvenience, infrequent service and lack of safety.”

7 Peregrine Falcon Photo Mike Houck DSC_0240
Peregrine Falcon. Photo: Mike Houck

The papal case for biodiversity and intrinsic value of nature

What struck me most about the Encyclical is the depth of scientifically-based discourse around biodiversity and the intrinsic value of nature. the fact that he received received a “chemical technician’s” degree and worked in a food-related laboratory cannot, alone, account for the depth of his arguments for the need to protect biodiversity, both for our own health and for the inherent value of the Earth’s biome.

In this regard, Francis, and with what is clearly remarkable stable of research assistants, writes of the importance of non-charismatic microfauna, recognizing the importance of species that are seldom, if ever, mentioned in urban planning contexts:

It may well disturb us to learn of the extinction of mammals or birds, since they are more visible. But the good functioning of ecosystems also requires fungi, algae, worms, insects, reptiles and an innumerable variety of microorganisms. Some less numerous species, although generally unseen, nonetheless play a critical role in maintaining the equilibrium of a particular place.”

8 Bumble BeeRegarding the intrinsic value of nature, the Encyclical says:

It is not enough, however, to think of different species merely as potential ‘resources’ to be exploited, while overlooking the fact that they have value in themselves.

Each year sees the disappearance of thousands of plant and animal species which we will never know, which our children will never see, because they have been lost for ever. The great majority become extinct for reasons related to human activity. Because of us, thousands of species will no longer give glory to God by their very existence, nor convey their message to us. We have no such right.

We take these systems into account not only to determine how best to use them, but also because they have an intrinsic value independent of their usefulness. Each organism, as a creature of God, is good and admirable in itself; the same is true of the harmonious ensemble of organisms existing in a defined space and functioning as a system.”

9 Nematode
Nematode

Environmental impact analysis, biodiversity hot spots and biological corridors

The breadth of the encyclical’s reach with regard to fundamental ecological principles goes far beyond what most urban planners include in their planning regime, including environmental impact analysis:

In assessing the environmental impact of any project, concern is usually shown for its effects on soil, water and air, yet few careful studies are made of its impact on biodiversity…”

Beyond simply addressing the importance of biodiversity, the encyclical specifies the important of biodiversity “hot spots”:

In the protection of biodiversity, specialists insist on the need for particular attention to be shown to areas richer both in the number of species and in endemic, rare or less protected species. Certain places need greater protection because of their immense importance for the global ecosystem…”

The city of Portland vowed to not limit its response to the listing of Chinook salmon and Steelhead trout to avoid "take" under the Endangered Species Act, but to enact policies and acdtions to recover the species. Westmoreland Park in Southeast Portland before restoration. Image courtesy, Portland Bureau of Environmental Services.
The city of Portland vowed to not limit its response to the listing of Chinook salmon and Steelhead trout to avoid “take” under the Endangered Species Act, but to enact policies and acdtions to recover the species. Westmoreland Park in Southeast Portland before restoration. Image courtesy, Portland Bureau of Environmental Services.
Crystal Spring Creek post restoration. Image courtesy, Portland Bureau of Environmental Services. During dedication of the restoration project in 2014 Chinook salmon were observed spawning in Crystal Springs Creek. Water temperatures in the creek provide cold water refugia for salmonids returning to their spawing grounds, in the face of elevated temperatures in the Willamette River.
Crystal Spring Creek post restoration. Image courtesy, Portland Bureau of Environmental Services. During dedication of the restoration project in 2014 Chinook salmon were observed spawning in Crystal Springs Creek. Water temperatures in the creek provide cold water refugia for salmonids returning to their spawing grounds, in the face of elevated temperatures in the Willamette River.

Cost-benefit analysis

Pope Francis frequently excoriates “the market” as a contributor to human misery and environmental degradation. Therefore, it’s no surprise that he takes on market failures with regard to ecosystems and human health and well-being. He writes:

Caring for ecosystems demands far-sightedness, since no one looking for quick and easy profit is truly interested in their preservation. But the cost of the damage caused by such selfish lack of concern is much greater than the economic benefits to be obtained…We can be silent witnesses to terrible injustices if we think that we can obtain significant benefits by making the rest of humanity, present and future, pay the extremely high costs of environmental deterioration.

It should always be kept in mind that ‘environmental protection cannot be assured solely on the basis of financial calculations of costs and benefits. The environment is one of those goods that cannot be adequately safeguarded or promoted by market forces.’ …Where profits alone count, there can be no thinking about the rhythms of nature, its phases of decay and regeneration, or the complexity of ecosystems which may be gravely upset by human intervention. Moreover, biodiversity is considered at most a deposit of economic resources available for exploitation, with no serious thought for the real value of things, their significance for persons and cultures, or the concerns and needs of the poor.”

Precautionary Principle

Francis also invokes the precautionary principle in writing:

The Rio Declaration of 1992 states that ‘where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a pretext for postponing cost-effective measures which prevent environmental degradation…If objective information suggests that serious and irreversible damage may result, a project should be halted or modified, even in the absence of indisputable proof. Here the burden of proof is effectively reversed, since in such cases objective and conclusive demonstrations will have to be brought forward to demonstrate that the proposed activity will not cause serious harm to the environment or to those who inhabit it.”

12 Image Equity Atlas
The Coalition for a Livable Future has mapped access to parks, trails, and natural areas in the Portland-Vancouver metropolitan region, allowing regional and local park providers to assess future acquisition to meet equity concerns in the region.

Equity

Finally, as many contributors to The Nature of Cities have argued, and as is the case with planning efforts in Portland and many other U.S. cities, addressing climate change and city building in general must incorporate concern for equity, in all its dimensions and outcomes. This includes what I would term “interspecies equity” as it relates to the intrinsic value of nature (without regard to nature’s value to us) and to intergenerational equity as articulated in the Encyclical:

The notion of the common good also extends to future generations…We can no longer speak of sustainable development apart from intergenerational solidarity. The environment is on loan to each generation, which must then hand it on to the next.”

Francis also addresses equity with regard to basic access to essential urban services such as affordable housing, clean air and water, and access to parks and nature.

 *  *  *

I have referenced only a few excerpts from the Encyclical that I believe relate directly and indirectly to topics commonly discussed in the forum of The Nature of Cities. I encourage you to read the entire Encyclical, which abounds with additional insights into creating more ecologically sustainable, just and resilient cities that protect, restore and manage the natural systems that constitute our cities’ natural green infrastructure.

Mike Houck
Portland

On The Nature of Cities

Reflections on Cities, Seasons and Bioregions

Many voices. Greener cities. Better cities.

This winter I had occasion to spend a few days in the city of Albuquerque, where it was cold, dry and brown. Winter in the Southwestern United States. Trees along the Rio Grande were bare; not too many trees elsewhere. Taking the taxi back home from the Los Angeles International Airport, fondly known as LAX, was almost a sensory overload, greenness everywhere in this Mediterranean climate: in median strips, in freeway interchanges, in cracks in sidewalks, along streets and in yards, feral weeds and selected plants. What irrigation and a benign climate can sustain is truly a wonder. Los Angeles has about 562 different tree species in the county, arguably one of the most biodiverse forests in the world, but virtually totally human created.

Such non-native tree diversity raises issues about what belongs, what doesn’t, and whether cities – almost entirely anthropogenic systems, including their urban vegetation – can be analyzed using conventional ecological science. I raise this as conventional ecosystem science has built in assumptions about processes that are derived from studying systems that evolved over a very long time. Are these assumptions adequate for anthropogenic ecosystems that are new? I don’t know, but surely worth some examination.

Los Angeles vegetation from around the world. Photo from “City of Los Angeles: Urban Forest Program Annual Report” (2004)

It is quite astonishing to drive around in L.A. and see what people have planted from around the world, from Australia, Latin America, Europe, Asia and North America. This riot of tree species, juxtaposed through human inspiration, raises provocative questions about concepts of biodiversity, conservation biology, and urban ecology. Is biodiversity a positive value in itself? If so, Los Angeles ranks very high on that index! Or is it indigenous biodiversity? In which case L.A. is far from the scrubby chaparral ecosystems and swamps that characterized its low lands, and the intermittent oak and black walnut forests of its alluvial fans. In this region, summer would be our equivalent of winter in the northern latitudes: plants shut down to survive rainless summers. Trees hug alluvial fans with accessible ground water, or the intermittent riparian corridors where water may have receded under ground. People chose to alter this native vegetation and landscape in the early Spanish colonial period, to introduce ceremonial and food bearing vegetation. As Anglo settlers came with their visions of Italy and Europe, with curiosity about plants in other parts of the world like Australia, Southern California was an excellent laboratory to experiment with new cultivars. Immigrants from east of the 100th meridian brought norms of landscaping, including lawns. Over a century and a half, the indigenous landscape was transformed to a lush, varied, and arguably seductive (but entirely new) set of plants and assemblages.

In LA, seasons be damned, lush green has been normalized as the quotidian landscape of the region. This is the new normal for Angelenos, and changing to something else will be difficult. It will be difficult because it takes time for expectations about normality to shift, and it will be difficult because there will have to be agreement about what the something else should be. Urban landscapes reflect history, culture and preferences – within the context of climate and geographical location. They are often far distant from the native ecosystems. Thus it is entirely legitimate to ask what kind of ecology is an urban one, as in cities, humans have came in, eradicated nearly all the native vegetation, transformed the soils and topography, and plunked a bunch of plants from around the world together because they liked them. Do these plant assemblages function in the same way as plant assemblages that evolved over millennia? Can the same tools be used to examine them?

Finally, there is the interesting development of ecosystem valuation. For cities this means developing metrics of the value of trees in cities for their carbon sequestration capacity, storm water mitigation, shading value to reduce the urban heat island and air pollution mitigation potential. For cities in the southwest – where there were no forests to begin with, and with urban trees from elsewhere – it will be important to balance these uncertain values with water requirements by trees. Again, the question of ecosystem science comes into play as much of the quantification of tree attributes in cities is based on average calculations of benefits from across the country. It all seems rather cobbled together in an effort to ensure that trees are planted in cities, rather than on careful examination of trees in situ. For I would argue, how well trees do in cities all depends – on soils, air pollution, watering regimes, pruning regimes, location and mostly on humans. Including the human element in urban ecology, still remains the frontier of research.

There is a temptation to naturalize urban systems, including their urban vegetation, but in the case of L.A. (and perhaps other cities too), perhaps we flip this on its head and humanize vegetation, asking why this type of planting, and how humans may impact its success. In the American Southwest, water is the key, and humans manage that asset. It will be a matter of choice whether the trees make it, versus lawns, or other values. Seasons will impact that choice only to the extent that summers become hotter and drier, or winters wetter and more violent. And that will depend on how the climate evolves, again a by-product of human decisions.

Regaining Paradise Lost: Global Investments, Mega-Projects, and Seeds of Local Resistance to Polluted Floods in Belém

Many voices. Greener cities. Better cities.
Where once Henry Walter Bates saw a vibrant and lush paradise, the very water Bates once leisurely enjoyed in his favorite spot in Belém is now overrun with sewage and disease. But the fight for a better city is not over…not if grassroots mobilization has anything to say about it.
People have lived in and around the Una Hydrographic Basin for as long as the city of Belém itself. Belém is the largest urban center in the Amazon River Delta, with a population that exceeds 2 million people in its metropolitan region. Beginning at Guajará Bay, the Una Basin comprises about 60 percent of Belém’s urban space and 30 percent of its population. This territory includes twenty districts and over four hundred million people. Perhaps not surprisingly, the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) deemed the Macro-drainage Project that took place between the 1980s and early 2000s in the Una Basin (Una Project), the “largest urban reform of its time in Latin America” (Costa 2013). This was happening at the same time that global consensus was broadening and beginning to see the Brazilian Amazon as more than just the host of the world’s largest tropical rainforest but also the site of major urban centers that have actually increased close to 300 percent in population size over the past 40 years. Yet a better understanding of Amazonian cities remains necessary, to which we contribute in this essay.

More than a century before this, though, Belém and the Una Basin were already world renowned for the region’s natural beauty. In the late 19th century, the famous English naturalist Henry Walter Bates used to walk through the várzea forests of the Una Basin and sail through the streams that connected the Guajará Bay to the vicinity of what was then downtown Belém. Bates described the Una Basin as his “favorite spot” and a “paradise for naturalists” (Bates 1944:83)—which is a good illustration of the historical perception of the Amazon region as “God’s Paradise” (Brondízio 2016). The contemporary urban imagery tells a distinct story, however. The status of paradise has changed as the Una Basin endured the impacts of what Belém’s policy-makers envisioned as modernization from the mid-20thcentury onward. In the mindset of the political leadership of this period, for macro-drainage projects to be considered modern when building basic sanitation and water treatment systems, the constructors used to rectify and concrete part of the streams connected to the Guajará Bay, which likely affected the permeable capacity of the soil. This standard was applied, for example, to the Docks region, a commercial hub at the time (see Figures 1 and 2).

Figure 1. View from 28 de Setembro Street at docks region in 1929-1930. Images: Federal University of Pará Architecture Department Virtual Laboratory blog, available here.
Figure 2. Channelized stream at Visconde de Souza Franco Avenue, dock region in the 1970s. Scan from the newspaper “O Liberal” in 1972. Available here.

Although development programs change over time and across landscapes, parallels exist between the Una Project, blueprints designed for the Amazonian forest, and the construction pictured in Figure 1 almost a century earlier. In the name of progress, modernity, and ultimately development, both nationally and internationally funded urbanization projects attracted a massive influx of migrants to Belém. With this influx of migrants, the banks of the Una River and its tributaries became dotted with various factories producing paper, vegetable oil, screws, packaging, and soap. Industrialization unfolded in tandem with the growing population density, resulting in increasing environmental degradation of the Una Basin.

It didn’t help matters that the old myth that Amazonian waters can absorb pollution, which rather seemed to be an assurance for people and reinforced cultural assumptions that the waters were by nature regenerative despite growing mistreatment of the environment. This myth was a powerful one—and arguably it still affects the region today (Brondízio 2016). It is not uncommon to find old residents in the Una Basin who recall the catastrophic image of fish floating on the surface of the Una River and other streams. It was, however, only the beginning of dealing with issues caused by the water. The strategy of concreting and rectifying the channel system to drain water was replicated in the Una Basin, albeit with minimal success in managing waste and hydrological resources (see, for example, the confluence of two canals in Figure 3).

Figure 3: The confluence of the Galo and 3 de Maio Channels. Photo: Vitor M. Dias, 2017.

The environmental damage to the rivers and the marginalization of impoverished Amazonians are complementary aspects in terms of water and land use of urban space in Belém. Informal settlements have either replaced or surrounded the factories and large constructions that occupied the banks and tributaries of the Una Basin. Over fifty percent of the individuals living in Belém reside in these settlements officially named as “subnormal agglomerations”, which are mostly located around lowland areas and close to the water. The lack of basic sanitation that affects about 90% of Belém’s population, combined with even just one season of heavy rainfall, easily exposes these disadvantaged neighborhoods and over half million people to the risk of flooding and the hazards associated with it (Mansur et al. 2016). In the end, while the “clean” water may wash away part of the sanitary waste, the contaminated water may also invade people’s homes in recurrent and often unpredictable flooding events. This situation happens every year, for example, in the location depicted in Figure 3, which is a longstanding front of fight and resistance for the better management of the channel system of the Una Basin. (Compare Figures 4 and 5.)

Figure 4: Galo Canal overflowing in 2005. Photo: Archives of the Front of the Aggrieved Residents of the Una Basin.

After years of mobilization, in 2013, local citizens managed to obtain a report from the Commission for the Defense of Human and Consumer Rights of the State House of Representatives (ALEPA—Assembléia Legislativa do Estado do Pará in Portuguese; see Comissão de Representação da Bacia do Una, 2013). The state legislators participating in this Commission investigated and confirmed that the Stations for Sewage Treatment (ETE, Estação de Tratamento de Esgoto in Portuguese) planned for the area had not been built (Pará 2006: 21).

Figure 5: Galo Canal overflowing in 2018. Photo: Archives of the Front of the Aggrieved Residents of the Una Basin.

Consequently, the sanitary waste continued to be discharged, without any treatment, into the channels of the Una Basin and then released at Guajará Bay afterward. In a new context and era, we can confirm Eduardo Brondízio’s assessment, published at The Nature of Cities, that the myth of Amazonian waters being capable of absorbing and diluting all kinds of waste persists, insofar as it has been used to bolster governmental arguments for not dealing with the problem of sanitary sewage in cities like Belém (Brondízio, 2016).

Building and reshaping the “Gray Hell”: The mix of gray(ish) concrete, green but harmful vegetation, and brown-muddy water

The context outlined so far seems to describe a metropolis where public investment in basic sanitation has been absent. Unfortunately, this is not the case, especially when referring to the Una Basin. The Una Project cost, after all, over 300 million U.S. dollars. The IDB and the local government allocated these funds to improve roads, water, sewage, and drainage, transforming the urban landscape and the livelihood of its inhabitants.

On the books, the Una Project presents outstanding numbers regarding its accomplishments. A report by the Sewage Company of Pará (COSANPA, Companhia de Saneamento do Pará in Portuguese) lists that the Una Project built 25,731 individual septic tanks, 91 collective cesspits, 307 kilometers of sewerage network, 2,164 inspection wells, 3,887 cleaning terminals, and a drying bed of septic tanks (Pará 2006:11). In reality, however, the Una Project actually created a mosaic of gray, concreted canals, green weeds plaguing the spots without maintenance, and brown-muddy water that invades many houses in the region, shaping distinct experiences relating to sanitation and water among the residents.

Simply put, when asphalt arrived and floods ceased in some areas, many other areas remained without paved roads, sewage treatment, and still experienced flooding events. This meant that the population was forced to adapt to these mixed results accordingly.

Figure 6. Sanitation public works of the Una Project in the early 2000s. Photo: Personal archives of Dona Lourdes, Una Basin resident and former community leadership.
Figure 7: Pipes close to the roof on a Una Basin residence in 2017. Photo: Vitor M. Dias.

For example, the two most significant shortcomings of the Una Project were that it excluded entire areas within the Una Basin from the construction. Also, the Una Project left several areas without micro-drainage structure that should have been built in parallel to the channel system. Controversy remains about the reasons for this exclusion.

This micro-drainage structure should include paving and surface drainage at the street level, as well as curbs, sluice gates, and manholes to handle the water coming from households and the rain. Vila Freitas, which is located on the banks of the Galo Channel, has long experienced flooding due to the absence of micro-drainage (see Figures 8 and 9).

Figure 8: Community Água Cristal, an excluded area from the Una Project in 2014. Photo: Pedro P. Soares.
Figure 9. Vila Freitas in 2018. Photo: Archives of the Front of the Aggrieved Residents of the Una Basin.

The adherence to the system of urban governance established to implement the Una Project has resulted in varying degrees of success. That is, some progress has been made, but at the expense of having excluded more than half of the more than 100,000 families residing in the Una Basin from reaping the benefits of these infrastructure developments. It further highlights how crucial it is to work from a planning perspective that understands the interconnectedness of social and spatial distribution of infrastructure, such as in the case of macro- and micro-drainage issues. This is what we have found to be the case in the Una Project of development, the limitations that stemmed from it, and the persistent segregation of Belém (Brondízio 2016).

Indeed, complications with this project continued even after it arguably came to an end. When the Una Project was officially closed and the disbursement contract with IDB was terminated, the Municipal Government of Belém received lots of different types of equipment—machinery, and vehicles from the State Government estimated at R$ 21,977,619.75 (Pará 2005)—which exceeded 52 million USD circa 2005, corresponding roughly to 66 million USD in 2018. The IDB facilitated the purchase of this proper apparatus for the maintenance of the Una Basin channel system to ensure the sustainability of a project of this magnitude. As an institutional innovation for the time, there was an interest of the financing organization in establishing a sustainable governance system of the Una Basin.

Linking global to local interests, representatives from the IDB and various governmental agencies cooperatively drafted and proposed the manual of operations for the maintenance plan of the Una Basin. Yet, it is not known for certain the whereabouts of some items of this equipment, compromising the already insufficient capacity to maintain the existing macro-drainage structure. Such factors ultimately motivated the resignation of then Secretary of Sanitation, Luiz Otávio Mota Pereira, amid a rupture with the mayor. Much later, in 2013, the City Council of Belém launched an official investigation to determine what happened to the equipment, machinery, and vehicles of the Una Basin maintenance plan. The results of this investigation remain inconclusive nonetheless (Belém 2015).

Toward the mobilization of legal actors by FMPBU: Urban problems as a matter of environmental and social justice

The abbreviation FMPBU stands for Front of the Aggrieved Residents of the Una Basin (Frente dos Moradores Prejudicados da Bacia do Una in Portuguese). It was created in 2011, when aggrieved citizens circulated a communiqué denouncing the conditions of the Una Basin to the participants of a public demonstration carried out by the Brazilian Bar Association. Fearing retaliation from local authorities, members of FMPBU did not feel safe to list their names in that document, which highlighted the obstacles to mobilization in the young, still-fragile democracy in Brazil.

In 2013, FMPBU consolidated itself as an urban, grassroots movement during the demonstrations of what became known in Brazil as the “Journeys of June” (Jornadas de Junho in Portuguese). The protests occurred in several Brazilian cities and addressed several matters from both federal and local level political agendas. In Belém, urban infrastructure was a key point raised within this context. FMPBU members thus attempted to take advantage of the atmosphere of political and cultural effervescence by distributing that same communiqué document from 2011. Simply put, pamphleting was another way FMBU had devised to hold public officials accountable for the growing problems and raise awareness among Belém’s inhabitants of flooding being a public policy issue besides being an environmental phenomenon. After all, the media and political discourses often converge when using environmental rhetoric and blaming the population for clogging the canals with garbage as fundamental causes of flooding, overlooking infrastructural problems. Most importantly, the document called attention to the recent role taken by legal actors as mediators of the Una Basin case.

The aggrieved citizens, to be sure, were not satisfied with how political forces were managing the polluted waters flooding people’s homes. They continued to mobilize, concentrating their efforts on Belém’s legal arena next. After successive complaints, in 2008, the State Prosecutor’s Office finally filed an environmental class action suit—Brazil’s Ação Civil Pública. The defendants of this lawsuit were the State of Pará, the Municipality of Belém, and COSANPA, which are responsible for maintaining and finalizing the constructions of the Una Project.

Despite this step forward, the class action suit progressed slowly, with the presiding judge only beginning to take significant steps to move the case forward in 2013 after pressure from the National Council of Justice—nearly five years after the suit was filed. An additional setback was that when it came time to negotiate the contents of a legal agreement between the parties of the lawsuit. The state prosecutors, defendants, and the judge discussed the terms of and plans for this agreement without the inputs from grassroots movements’ leaders or any of the individual citizens affected by the floods within the Una Basin. Rather, while those players were meeting in the room where the judicial hearing was taking place, members of the movement and other citizens were awaiting their fate outside.

Figure 10: Members of social movements and individual residents of the Una Basin waiting outside the room where the judicial hearing was taking place on September 26 of 2013. “Em audiência”, in red, means “hearing taking place”. Photo: Front of the Aggrieved Residents of the Una Basin blog. Available here.

After 2013, the steps needing to be taken in compliance with the agreement above were suspended. The municipality claims that it has negotiated resources with the IDB to comply with the terms agreed upon in court, but obtaining these resources raises uncertainty as to whether this is a matter of more money or better governance to ensure the maintenance of the Una channel system. Former managers of Project Una have already stated that this amount is not enough to do the necessary revitalization process, not to mention the pending issues that have yet to be built. Moreover, once the funding from IDB is disbursed, residents of the Una Basin are concerned that these resources might be allocated to finish other macro-drainage projects in the city, e.g., the Estrada Nova Basin, and not to improve the situation of the Una Basin.

Through the length of the legal battle, the social uprisings, and political clashes, the Una Basin continues to endure consecutive years of flooding after its so-called completion. The environmental degradation and loss of quality of life for residence, in turn, raise doubt about the capacity to implement and enforce new urban policies in the Brazilian Amazon. Additionally, the management of the water and sewage system in Belém, in general, and the Una Basin, in particular, remains precarious with the population facing unpredictable and frequent flooding events. Let us not forget the role the Inter-American Development Bank played in this. The results of the Una Project question whether such international forces by a multilateral bank are capable of spurring best management practices aimed at sustainability or if this model can ever really improve the path-dependent systems that run these cities and continue to perpetuate inequalities. Belém thus reveals a complex political ecology of flooding with an interconnected mosaic of players and institutions at various levels of governance from both global and local scales, all of which have been called into and have shown limited capacity of action.

Where once Henry Walter Bates saw and wrote of a vibrant and lush paradise (see Figure 11), the very water Bates once leisurely enjoyed in his favorite spot in the city is now overrun with sewage and disease. What remains today is a complex social-ecological landscape, where flooded and eroded urban landscapes strain the quality of life and livelihood of impoverished and increasingly stratified social classes. To conclude, we hasten to say that this does not mean that the fight for a better city is over; well, at least if it depends on grassroots mobilization. Ten years after Una’s class action suit was filed, the state prosecutors called for a public hearing to discuss the pending issues of the Una Project. This hearing is going to take place in December 2018, and yet again, it is a direct result of persistent mobilization by the members of FMPBU.

Figure 11. Una Basin delta region in the 19th century: Henry Walter Bates’ paradise. Photo: VASQUEZ, P. Mestres da fotografia no Brasil: Coleção Gilberto Ferrez. Rio de Janeiro: Centro Cultural Banco do Brasil, 1995.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Eduardo Brondízio for his comments on early drafts of this essay and the support of the Center for the Analysis of Social-Ecological Landscapes (CASEL) at Indiana University-Bloomington. We are also indebted to the members of FMPBU, the Assisting Program to Urban Reform and the Research Program on Urban Policy and Social Movements in the Globalized Amazon of the Graduate Program of the Faculty of Social Service at the Federal University of Pará (PARU and GPPUMA at UFPA). Special thanks to Andressa V. Mansur for her insights on this topic and her friendship that brought the authors of this essay together.

José Alexandre de Jesus Costa, Vitor Martins Dias, and Pedro Paulo de Miranda Araújo Soares
Belém, Bloomington, and Belém

* The authors have been listed in alphabetical order based on last name. They have equally contributed to the essay.

On The Nature of Cities

 

Resources

Bates, Henry Walter. O naturalista no Rio Amazonas. São Paulo: Brasiliana, 1944.

Belém. Câmara Municipal. Relatório Final da Comissão Palramentar de Inquérito com o objetivo de investigar indícios de irregularidades na transferência, para empresas da iniciativa privada, de veículos e equipamentos doados pelo Governo do Estado do Pará ao Município de Belém. Diário Oficial da Câmara, Belém, 15, 16, 17, 18 e 19 dez. 2014

Brondízio, Eduardo S. The Elephant in the Room: Amazonian Cities Deserve More Attention in Climate Change and Sustainability Discussions. The Nature of Cities, 2016. Available on: https://www.thenatureofcities.com/2016/02/02/the-elephant-in-the-room-amazonian-cities-deserve-more-attention-in-climate-change-and-sustainability-discussions/. Accessed on 08/02/2018.

Comissão de Representação da Bacia do Una. Assembleia Legislativa do Pará. Relatório Final. Belém, 2013.

Costa, Marco Aurélio, Isadora Tami Lemos (Orgs.). 40 Anos de Regiões Metropolitanas no Brasil, IPEA, 2013.

FMPBU. O que é a Frente dos Moradores Prejudicados da Bacia do Una? Frente dos Moradores Prejudicados da Bacia do Una, 2013. Disponível em http://frentebaciadouna.blogspot.com/2013/. Accessed on 08/02/2018.

IBGE, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics). 2011. Censo Demográfico 2010 – Aglomerados Subnormais: Informações Territoriais. Censo Demográfico Rio de Janeiro, available at: http://bit.ly/2mhWy4g.

Mansur, Andressa V., Eduardo S. Brondízio, Samapriya Roy, Scott Hetrick, Nathan D. Vogt, and Alice Newton. An Assessment of Urban Vulnerability in the Amazon Delta and Estuary: A Multi-Criterion Index of Flood Exposure, Socio-Economic Conditions and Infrastructure. Sustainability Science 11(4): 625-643, 2016.

Pará (Estado). Companhia de Saneamento do Estado do Pará. Ata de reunião para transferência de equipamentos para a Prefeitura Muncipal de Belém, conforme previsto na cláusula 6.05 dos contratos de empréstimo nº 649/OC-BR e nº 869/SF-BR firmados entre o Estado do Pará, mutuário final e o BID – Banco Interamericano de Desenvolvimento, órgão financiador,realizada em 02 de janeiro de 2005. p. 01-05.

dos Santos, Flávio Augusto Altieri, and Edson José Paulino da Rocha. Alagamento e Inundação em Áreas Urbanas. Estudo de Caso: Cidade de Belém. Revista GeoAmazônia 2(1): 33-55, 2014.

Vasquez, Pedro. Mestres da fotografia no Brasil: Coleção Gilberto Ferrez. Rio de Janeiro: Centro Cultural Banco do Brasil, 1995.

Vitor Martins Dias

About the Writer:
Vitor Martins Dias

Ph.D. Student in Sociology at Indiana University-Bloomington. Affiliated Researcher at the Center for the Analysis of Social-Ecological Landscapes (CASEL, Indiana University-Bloomington), and Research Fellow at the Milt and Judi Stewart Center on the Global Legal Profession (Indiana University Maurer School of Law

Pedro Paulo de Miranda Araújo Soares

About the Writer:
Pedro Paulo de Miranda Araújo Soares

PNPD/CAPES Scholar and Visiting Professor at Federal University of Pará (UFPA, Brazil). Member of the Assisting Program to Urban Reform (PARU) and the Research Program on Urban Policy and Social Movements in the Globalized Amazon (GPPUMA) of the Graduate Program in Social Work at the Federal University of Pará (PPGSS-UFPA).

Regional Parks Connect People to Nature Close to Home

Many voices. Greener cities. Better cities.
Regional park systems can play a vital role in bringing nature to people by creating green spaces where people can escape the daily urban grind, even if for only a few minutes or hours.
Connecting to nature where you live

Regional parks and park systems are a perfect response to the modern conundrum of creating dense urban fabrics where people can become increasingly isolated from nature. The scale of a regional park system means that it can encompass all or a large part of a metropolitan area, thereby enabling the selection of park lands that can transcend individual municipal boundaries and provide larger-scale regional benefits to urban dwellers. This is important because it means that regional-scale protected areas can encompass larger wild lands that are important for conservation purposes while still providing close-by public access opportunities.

It is almost astonishing that in the larger world of parks and protected areas management, regional park systems are not better recognized. Perhaps this reflects a preoccupation among some protected area circles about the relevance and contribution of international, national, or territorial level park systems in meeting ambitious commitments for protection of terrestrial and marine ecosystems, and in responding to climate change, biodiversity protection, landscape connectivity, invasive species, and historical/cultural recognition and inclusion. The voices engaged in these discussions are most often representatives of higher-level park systems. The result being that contributions of lower-level park and protected area systems are strikingly overlooked when it comes to accounting for the positive social, cultural, economic, and environmental outcomes that all levels of park systems provide.

A significant percentage of global parks and protected areas are embedded within local, community, and regional level park systems. These systems provide immense value and benefits to people and the environment. Leaving them out of higher-level considerations translates into an undercount when calculating the positive global impact of parks and protected areas to a burgeoning human population and diminishing natural environment.

Figure 1. Ambury Regional Park, Auckland, New Zealand. Photo by Chris Gin, Flickr.

In December 2016, I guest edited a special issue of the George Wright Forum with a focus on regional park systems. This was a first for the George Wright Forum, which historically has highlighted the contributions of national and international parks and protected areas. This issue was also important because it signals a growing recognition of the value of sub-national park systems as key partners in global efforts to protect enough land to help offset growing social and environmental strains the world over. In the case of regional park systems, the focus is on providing adequate green space close to where most people live, which increasingly is in large urban areas.

Figure 2. Coyote Hills Regional Park, Fremont, California, USA. Photo: Mohnishkodnani, Flickr.

As noted, regional parks are usually associated with urban areas. Thus, they are close by to the people who use them. Unlike national or territorial parks, whose locations and governance systems can seem remote and disconnected from their constituents, regional parks systems are right where people live, creating a direct connection between politicians, tax dollars, agencies, and the public. Regional parks are representative of, and accountable to, the people who use them most—the feedback loop among all parties is immediate and responsive. This creates a huge advantage to regional park systems because the people who directly fund the parks directly benefit from the parks, creating a sense of ownership and local pride in a well-developed and well-used park system.

Figure 3. Beachcomber Regional Park, Parkesville, British Columbia, Canada. Photo: Alan Sandercock, Flickr.

That being said, regional park systems are not all the same. A wide variety of models have been used to create and administer regional park systems. The articles in the December 2016 George Wright Forum issue explore some of these forms, which include single systems, collaborative systems, and systems that defy any typical definition of a regional park system. This flexibility is perhaps a key ingredient of the success of regional park systems—for while they are united by a relative geographic scale and focus, they are responsive and adaptive to local conditions and opportunities. There is no “one size fits all” when it comes to regional park systems.

Figure 4. Lohas Park, Hong Kong. Photo: November-13, Flickr.

Regional park systems are found around the world. Virtually every large metropolitan area has some form of regional park system. The rise of regional park systems goes hand in hand with the rise of cities and the growing concern over urban sustainability and quality of life. Urban sustainability and quality of life can be partially addressed by embedding green infrastructure throughout a metropolitan area. It can be arguably stated that there is no great city in the world without a correspondingly great green infrastructure network. This can be seen in cities such as Boulder, Chicago, Denver, Detroit, Los Angeles, Minneapolis-St. Paul, New York, Portland, San Francisco, and Seattle in the United States; Calgary, Ottawa, Toronto, Victoria, Vancouver, and Winnipeg in Canada; Berlin, London, and Oslo in Europe; Wellington and Auckland in New Zealand; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Cape Town, South Africa; and Hong Kong in China, among many other global cities. All these cities have in common a regional-scale approach to their parks and protected areas systems.

Regional parks provide many values that are particularly relevant to metropolitan areas, including socio-cultural, economic, and environmental. Examples of social values include the benefits of close contact with nature to reduce stress, aid in healing, increase cognitive skills, and contribute to individual and community health and wellness. There is ample evidence to support the idea that people need close and regular contact with nature for emotional and psychological well-being. Perhaps best popularized by Harvard University professor, E.O. Wilson in the Biophilia Hypothesis (1993, pg. 31), is the idea that humans are “hard wired” to need connection with nature and other forms of life. Cities and urban areas are well-positioned to provide this connection by thoroughly integrating nature into the metropolitan environment. Cultural values can be celebrated through regional parks, where parks protect and reflect important cultural identities that are place- and history-based. In this sense, regional parks can help to transcend socioeconomic and identity politics by providing meaningful and relevant public spaces where diverse members of society can feel at home. Well-maintained and situated green spaces can increase community cohesiveness by promoting interaction among neighbors in safe and accessible public environments.

Figure 5. Greenwich Park #1, London, England. Photo: Alan Stanton, Flickr.

It has been repeatedly shown that parks and green spaces can raise surrounding property values, thereby contributing to urban economic prosperity (Catrakilis, 2015). The existence value of green space next to residential, commercial, and institutional properties is viewed positively and dwellings adjacent to parks and green space command higher prices, which in turn increases property taxes which helps to offset the cost of maintaining parks. Examples of increased property values can be found adjacent to any of the world’s great urban parks, such as Central Park in New York City or Golden Gate Park in San Francisco. Parks and green spaces contribute to spin off businesses, such as recreation and fitness providers, hotels, restaurants, and tourism. Signature parks, such as San Diego’s Balboa Park, and Portland’s Forest Park, are good examples of metropolitan area parks that have become major tourist destinations.

Figure 6. Balboa Park, San Diego, California, USA. Photo: Anthony Dolce, Flickr.

Regional parks contribute to environmental sustainability in large part through securing “natural capital” or “nature’s services”—or the suite of environmental benefits that nature provides for free. In urban areas, these benefits have tangible value. For instance, the establishment of greenbelts and protected forests, agricultural lands, wetlands, and other green spaces around cities such as Toronto and Ottawa has helped to protect essential ecosystem services like water filtration and wildlife habitat (2010, p. 9). In Vancouver, Canada, a natural capital valuation study determined that protection of forests, watersheds, wetlands, and grasslands provided a natural capital benefit of $5.4 billion a year (2010, p. 9).

Figure 7. White Tank Mountain Regional Park, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Photo: Broderick Delaney, Flickr.

These benefits can be secured by establishing robust regional park systems, where the benefits of nature protection can clearly outweigh the values through conversion into other uses. Regional parks and protected areas facilitate connectivity conservation, where core “wild” areas are linked by urban green infrastructure to support maintenance of biological diversity and species migration, and by helping to decrease habitat fragmentation, degradation, and loss. In sum, regional park systems provide immeasurable tangible and intangible benefits to urban areas across all dimensions.

 Regional park systems: unique reflections of nature, people, and place

Clearly, regional parks are important contributors to human health and well-being, as well as to environmental and economic sustainability. The five contributing articles to the December 2016 George Wright Forum focused on different aspects of the values and benefits of regional park systems. They also illustrate a range of governance types and funding models which highlights just how flexible and adaptable this form of park system is. The unifying factor among them all is their geographic scope and urban focus.

The series of articles began with a contribution from Robert Doyle, General Manager of the East Bay Regional District (Regional District). The Regional District is situated in the densely populated San Francisco Bay Area, home to more than 2.8 million people. Established in 1934, the Regional District is one of the oldest regional park districts in the United States. Its beginnings are closely intertwined with the National Park Service, part of whose mandate was to foster the development of state and local parks, and to the progressive thinking and intellectual rigor of graduates coming out of U.C. Berkeley. For instance, in 1930, Frederick Law Olmsted Jr. and Ansel Hall produced a seminal report which provided a blueprint for the early park system which is still relevant today.

Figure 8. Roberts Regional Park, Oakland, California, USA. Photo: Swedg, Flickr.

Currently, the Regional District manages over 121,030 acres in 73 parks in Alameda and Contra Costa counties, including over 1,250 miles of trails. With over 25 million visits each year, the Regional District receives more visitors than Yosemite, Monterey Peninsula, and Napa Valley combined. The Regional District faces significant challenges in uncertain times, including population growth and changing demographics, planning for climate change, responding to user conflicts, and maintaining aging infrastructure. The Regional District responds to these challenges through a variety of means including a focus on community engagement and youth outreach. The Regional District is also a major player in protecting wildlands and habitats for endangered species through land acquisition and partnering with state and federal wildlife agencies. The Regional District is heavily involved with preparing for climate change and sea level rise, helping to protect millions of people who are vulnerable to its effects. The Regional District is now a national role model; its success is based on over 80 years of working to protect regional landscapes and connecting people to those lands where they live.

Figure 9. Oxbow Regional Park, Portland, Oregon, USA. Photo: Metro News, Flickr.

Another very successful regionally based park system was explored in the article by Mike Houck, Director of the Urban Greenspaces Institute, and co-founder of the Intertwine Alliance. Mike is a frequent contributor to The Nature of Cities, and also sits on TNOC’s Board of Directors. Mike’s article traced the incremental evolution of greens pace, park, trail, and natural resources planning in the Portland, Oregon-Vancouver, Washington metropolitan region over the past 35 years. Mike stated that in the early days he was told by local land use planners that there was “no place for nature in the city.”  However, thinking along this line has shifted to the point where now urban nature advocates have embraced a 21st-century corollary to Thoreau’s aphorism that “in livable cities is preservation of the wild.”

This thinking has laid the groundwork for the development of a remarkable regionally-based parks and protected areas system, which is another national role model for sustainable urban development. Mike pointed out, even though the state of Oregon requires an Urban Growth Boundary for every city in the state (which has helped to reduce urban sprawl and protect the working landscape outside of urban growth areas), it has meant the loss of natural areas inside of the Urban Growth Boundary.

Fortunately, many conservation and civic organizations have retooled their efforts to protect and restore nature in the Portland and Vancouver metropolitan area. This has resulted in over 17,000 acres protected regionally and an increase in local parks. Mike provided a series of lessons learned during the development of the regional park system, including the importance of picking a good role model (they picked the East Bay Regional Park District), building relationships, engaging the federal government, thinking big, listening to outside experts, and selecting an icon as conservation catalyst. Mike ends his article by discussing the development of The Intertwine Alliance as the next step in ensuring that earlier successes are not ephemeral or “one-offs,” but coordinated around a common agenda. The Intertwine Alliance has been hugely successful in realizing its founders’ vision of creating a world-class system of parks, trails, and natural areas for people to access nature where they live, work, and play.

Figure 10. Ontario Greenbelt, Pickering, Ontario, Canada. Photo: Ken Nash, Flickr.

A much different regionally-based park system was discussed by Burkhard Mausberg, the former CEO of the Friends of the Greenbelt Foundation and the Greenbelt Fund in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Burkhard talked about the success of Ontario, Canada’s Greenbelt, a 2-million-acre swath of green space and farmland encircling the greater Toronto urban area. According to Burkhard, the Greenbelt turned 12 years old in 2017, and it is now the world’s largest peri-urban protected area. Burkhard wrote that the creation of the Greenbelt was the result of growing frustration with land use planning in the Greater Toronto Area. The public recognized the negative impacts of poor development and the loss of green space and farmland, and in 2005 the provincial Greenbelt Act and Plan was passed with much fanfare. Today, the Greenbelt stands as an outstanding example of far-sighted regional planning and its power to shape the landscape for generations to come. Burkhard detailed the many benefits of the Greenbelt, including as an economic powerhouse for the region through its 161,000 jobs in farming, tourism, and recreation.

While not a typical regional park system, the Greenbelt protects more than 70 species at risk, hundreds of rivers and streams, thousands of forested acres, and outstanding biological diversity just miles from Canada’s most populated urban area. Some of the other benefits of the Greenbelt include its contribution to protecting ecological services, estimated to be worth a conservative $3.2 billion a year, or $1,600 per acre.

Figure 11. Ontario Greenbelt, Kelso, Ontario, Canada. Photo: Christoph Ulanski, Flickr.

The Greenbelt also features the largest network of hiking trails in Canada, including the world-famous 725-kilometer-long Bruce Trail, which follows the Niagara Escarpment across cities, towns, farmland and conservation areas. Plans for the Greenbelt include growing it by more than 1.5 million acres; a good start towards realizing this vision was made in May 2017 with the protection of 21 major urban river valleys and associated coastal wetlands across the Greater Toronto Area. The Greenbelt stands alone as a shining example of the power of regional landscape protection that is flexible and responsive in providing value to people where they live.

A fourth article was written by Harry Klinkhamer, a park interpreter and historian who worked in the forest preserves of Chicago Wilderness for many years. Harry traced the evolution of park planning and development in the Chicago metropolitan area since the 1830s. His article provides an in-depth glimpse into the complexities and thinking behind the creation of one of the world’s greatest regionally-based parks and protected areas system. The genesis of Chicago Wilderness can be traced back to the city’s founding in the 1830s when the idea of a “city in a garden” was born. As Harry points out, Chicago has been home to “rather progressive and unconventional approaches to parks and wilderness for well over 100 years.”

Figure 12. Timber Lake Forest Preserve, West Chicago, Illinois, USA. Photo: Wendy Piersall, Flickr.

Today, the Chicago urban area does not have one overarching regional park system, but rather its park space is managed by hundreds of park districts, many county forest preserve districts, the state and federal governments, and Chicago Wilderness. Harry outlined a fascinating history of the development of this complex parks and protected areas network. More recently, in 1996, a group of individuals from 34 different agencies met to help define urban wilderness and develop a comprehensive plan to preserve, restore, and educate the public about nature. A common theme was the realization that ecosystems know no political boundaries and it would take a committed coalition to improve biodiversity and the natural landscape of the Chicago region. Out of this conversation, Chicago Wilderness was formed, whose purpose was to “sustain, restore, and expand our remnant natural communities.” Today, Chicago Wilderness is a model for other major urban areas to emulate. Its members include local, state, and federal agencies; business sector partners; non-profit organizations; and research institutions. This unique partnership works because the community sees Chicago as essentially a nature reserve of over 370,000 acres intimately integrated into a large urban area home to millions of people.

Figure 13. Nature and the City, Chicago, Illinois, USA. Photo: Monika Thorpe, Flickr.

The final article in the series was written by Dr. Mike Walton, Senior Manager of Regional Parks in the Capital Regional District (CRD), Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. Mike wrote about the importance of regional parks to urban populations due to their proximity and accessibility. Regional Parks, according to Mike, provide important opportunities for urban dwellers to visit nearby wilderness areas, which are also home to a great diversity of plant and animal species. Mike described the CRD regional parks system, noting that the 31 regional parks and three regional trails protect about 13,000 hectares of land that are home to three large carnivore species: black bear, wolf, and cougar. Including the region’s protected watershed, the CRD owns and protects almost 14 percent of the regional land base. When all levels of protected areas in the region are included, almost 20 percent of the land base is protected. This is a significant achievement, and this percentage is expected to increase over the next number of years through CRD Regional Parks’ land acquisition fund.

Figure 14. East Sooke Regional Park, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. Photo: Mary Sanseverino.

 Mike notes that unlike the U.S. and Canadian national park systems, the CRD regional parks system is experiencing sustained visitation growth. At least some of this increase in visitation can be attributed to increasingly urban, multicultural, and ethnically diverse populations. However, he remarked that these populations might think differently about near urban wilderness and its importance. Some may be hesitant to visit landscapes that are home to large carnivores, which puts a renewed emphasis on providing a broad range of experiences to attract non-traditional park visitors.

Mike also talks about the role of regional parks as a bridging organization between local and state/provincial/federal protected area systems. In this sense, park interpreters and social scientists can provide essential information gathering and dissemination services to better serve park visitors and park agencies. Mike discusses the important role of regional park systems in helping to achieve global commitments for the conservation of nature, and in linking together fragmented landscapes into interconnected matrixes. Finally, Mike posits that the location of regional parks as backyards to millions of city dwellers represent that nexus where people can reconcile their beliefs about wilderness to benefit non-human species for generations to come.

The beauty of regional parks

Recognition of the value and benefits of regionally-based park systems is growing. The benefits span ecological, spiritual, emotional, physiological, psychological, economic, cultural, and sociological realms. As more and more people crowd into urban areas, the need for regular contact with nature has never been greater. Increasingly, progressive land use planners, politicians, civic leaders, academics, ecologists, conservationists, urbanists, and others are working on ways to make cities sustainable and great places to live, work, and play. This assimilation of thought and practice has never been as necessary as when it comes to fully integrating the built and unbuilt environment within metropolitan areas.

Figure 15. Central Park, New York City, USA. Photo: Mathieu, Flickr

Humans need regular, sustained, joyful, nourishing, daily contact with nature, and where better to provide that contact than where most people spend most their lives—in urban areas. Regional park systems can play a vital role in bringing nature to people by creating green spaces where people can escape the daily urban grind, even if for only a few minutes or hours.

There are many outstanding examples of cities around the world who are taking up this challenge and creating more inviting, sustainable, humane spaces that benefit both people and the environment through the development of regional park systems. As the articles in the December 2016 issue of the George Wright Forum highlight, the adaptability and responsiveness of regional park systems to local circumstances and constituents is a key to their success, and one reason why they are becoming increasingly important and relevant to city living. Perhaps the aim for all great cities should be to create “Urbs in Solitudinem” or “Cities in Wilderness” as the title of Harry Klinkhamer’s article posits. Regional parks are certainly key to achieving this grand and beautiful vision.

Figure 16. Botanical Gardens, Singapore—the Garden City. Photo: Stephen McGrath, Flickr.

Lynn Wilson
Vancouver

On The Nature of Cities

Banner Photo:
Wittys Lagoon Regional Park, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. Photo: © Bev Hall.

Notes

  1. The George Wright Society, founded over 35 years ago, is dedicated to building the knowledge needed to protect, manage, and understand parks, protected areas and cultural sites around the globe (https://www.georgewrightsociety.org/).
  2. The George Wright Forum issue referenced in this essay is Volume 33, #3, 2016. It can be accessed in its entirety at http://www.georgewright.org/forum_issues.

References

Catrakilis, N. (2015). Literature Survey: Green Space and Property Values.  Urban Economics, Duke University.  Accessed January 15, 2018 at: https://sites.duke.edu/urbaneconomics/?p=1441.

Kellert, S.R. (ed.) (1993). The Biophilia Hypothesis. Island Press. ISBN 1-55963-147-3.

Wilson, S.J. (2010). Natural Capital in BCs Lower Mainland: Valuing the Benefits from Nature. Davis Suzuki Foundation, Vancouver, Canada.

Regulating the Bee Buzz

Many voices. Greener cities. Better cities.

Most people would agree that honeybees need help. Concerns about their dwindling numbers and the pesticides used on the food they eat have rallied environmental activists around the save-the-bees cause.

2015-04-22 08.13.01
Photo: Jennifer Baljko

That increased awareness, combined with a host of other reasons including a movement to buy and produce local-made, organic honey, has spurred another noticeable trend: a rise in urban beekeeping, something we discuss in this podcast.

The increased number of beehives we’re hearing about in cities around the world brings with it another conversation about regulation. How are cities striking a balance between wanting to engage with sustainable, green efforts that support a healthy pollinator ecosystem while also protecting their citizens from pesky flying insects that swarm and sting when threatened?

It’s not always an easy question to answer. City rules on this topic are as diverse as the beehives taking up residence on rooftops. In some places, it’s illegal for an individual to have a beehive on his apartment building balcony because of the risk the bees pose to the general population. In other places, beehives are illegal in urban spaces in much the same way that keeping cows, goats and sheep is illegal. Other cities are incredibly lenient in regulating beekeeping practices, and anyone who wants a hive can set one up. Some municipalities require beekeepers to register their hives, like dog owners who have to register their pups. And elsewhere, the idea of urban beekeeping is so new that the city council hasn’t had to deal with regulating it yet.

New York, for instance, lifted a ban on beekeeping in 2010, and amended a city health code to allow residents to keep hives of the common, nonaggressive honeybee. Beekeepers must register their hives and adhere to other standards, such as maintaining a certain distance from property lines, providing water sources, and being able to control swarms, said Andrew Coté, president of the New York City Beekeepers Association.

2015-04-22 08.38.16
City bees in Barcelona. Photo: Jennifer Baljko

“I think things need to be regulated to some extent. We need licenses for our dogs, or to drive a car, or to operate a hotdog cart,” he said. “And, I think when you’re talking about a box of 75,000 flying, stinging, venomous insects, I think, it’s reasonable that they’re registered and that there is some sort of regulation because not everyone is as courteous as perhaps they need to be.”

City officials in San Francisco, a city where social leanings traditionally bend to the left and city-improvement ideas are experimented with more liberally, foster an open dialog about urban beekeeping, said Terry Oxford, a San Francisco beekeeper, artist, and environmental activist.

“San Francisco is a joy and a gift. It’s so advanced and ahead of the curve in terms of really understanding really important issues and in offering a platform for those issues. Sustainability is part of the local conversation all the time,” she said. “Beekeeping is not illegal here. The way it’s written in the books is that if someone complains, you have to move your bees. So, what I’ve learned, is how to be very, very nimble as a rooftop beekeeper and how to get 60,000 bees off a roof if I have to.”

Barcelona’s local government and the Catalan regional parliament are also reviewing the issue, said Jaume Clotet, a beekeeper who runs Mel.lis Serveis Apícoles.

2015-03-23 11.59.40
Photo: Jennifer Baljko

Clotet manages 90 beehives in Barcelona’s metropolitan area and nearby rural areas, and, in addition to the Museu de Ciències Naturals’ (Museum of Natural Sciences) rooftop hives, he helps manage Barcelona’s two municipal-run apiaries at a city park and community garden. Along with Apicultura Urbana, Clotet has proposed plans to Barcelona city officials to install hives in eight other locations around the city.

Recently, there has been increased sensitivity around expanding an urban beekeeping footprint, he added. Barcelona has a law that protects bees, and the city is collaborating with beekeeping advocates to better understand how more beekeeping efforts can work within the city limits. Also, in March 2014 the Generalitat (the Catalan government) changed a regulation prohibiting animal-production activity within 400 meters of a city; the original rule included all sorts of animals such as cows, chicken, pig, sheep, and, yes, bees. Now, residents can ask each city hall for permission to install beehives; if permission is granted, beekeeping efforts can move forward without the province’s minimum distance requirement, Clotet said.

“Individuals citizens shouldn’t be the ones deciding if they can keep beehives at home. This should be controlled. The ones who should be primarily concerned about this—and who should set the first examples of how it could work within a city—should be the local authorities and local city halls,” he said. “They should start with this and check how it goes and how it grows, and how much it grows. Hopefully, next year, there will be one or two new beehive facilities in the city. Of course, I would like to install as many beehives as possible, but, like everywhere, we live in cities and towns, and the opinions of citizens should absolutely be considered.”

Jennifer Baljko
Barcelona

On The Nature of Cities

What is your city’s approach to monitoring and regulating beekeeping activities? Tell us on Twitter (@TNatureOfCities) or in the comments section below.

Do you believe city governments should regulate urban beekeeping?

When it comes to urban beekeeping, would you prefer…
—Strict regulation?
—A minimum amount of regulation?
—No regulation at all?
—Something in the middle?

Should urban beekeeping regulations lean more toward…
—Supporting sustainable city pollination efforts?
—Protecting humans?
—Protecting bees?
—None of these things?
—Something else?

Related Stories:

The Secret Life of Bees: Using Big Data and Citizen Science to Unravel…What Bees Are Saying about the Environment

The City Bees. This is The Nature of Cities Podcast Episode 005

 

Reimagining Nairobi National Park: Counter-Intuitive Tradeoffs to Strengthen This Urban Protected Area

Many voices. Greener cities. Better cities.

Nairobi is a bustling city of over 3 million people, many of whom are stuck in traffic for hours each day. One effort to mitigate these wasteful jams involves construction of additional motorways. But with little space specifically reserved for these new arteries, their proposed routes involve some delicate tradeoffs. One such road, the proposed Southern Bypass, is planned to run along the eastern boundary of Nairobi National Park. As presently designed, 150 acres of park land would need to be degazetted (i.e., lost) to accommodate the new road. Several nature conservation organizations have joined together to oppose the project, and a pending legal action has provisionally halted all construction.

In passing, one might understand this story as a tale of local conservation organizations banding together to “hold the line” — protecting a parcel of wilderness from the bulldozers of urban expansion. But in an urban system as complicated as Nairobi, context truly matters. Managing urban nature requires flexible and forward-looking perspectives, and I argue here that the issue is much more intricate than first meets the eye.

In fact, the project presents a rare opportunity, if leveraged aggressively, to expand and strengthen the integrity of Park while letting the Bypass go forward.

A Giraffe in Nairobi National Park. Photo: Wikipedia Commons
A Giraffe in Nairobi National Park. Photo: Wikipedia Commons

Nairobi National Park: a brief introduction

Situated just outside Kenya’s capital, the 117km² Nairobi National Park is a relatively small protected area (IUCN Category II). Managed by the Kenya Wildlife Service, this urban protected area is home to a wide range of wildlife, such as lion, leopard, cheetah, buffalo, giraffe, and the critically endangered black rhinoceros.

 

Nairobi and its urban national park, Credit: Quentin Fleuret, 2012
Nairobi and its urban national park, Credit: Quentin Fleuret, 2012

The formally protected area is itself an integral part of a 2000km² semi-arid savannah ecosystem, marked by characteristic seasonal wildlife migration from as far south as Tanzania. In the dry-season months of June to November, herbivores such as zebra and wildebeest take their annual refuge within park boundaries. From December, when rains return, this wildlife quickly disperses back to the open plains, where food will have become more plentiful and predators are more easily avoided.

Beyond serving as important habitat for wildlife, these plains south of Nairobi are also the traditional home of Maasai pastoralists, who have long adapted their practices to the natural rhythms of seasonal migration. For example, these herdsmen judiciously move away from migration routes at times when predators and calving wildlife posed risk to their cattle.

Back in 1946, when this national park was first established, these migrations were largely undisturbed by human activity. The city of Nairobi was much smaller then — about 120,000 residents — and the park was an unfenced wilderness somewhat beyond the urban horizon. Residential and industrial activity remained largely concentrated around Nairobi’s core, and a wide buffer remained between built-up and protected areas. Beyond the boundaries, with but little competition for land, wildlife, pastoralists, and city-dwellers all managed to live together.

However, Nairobi’s formerly modest urban center has now grown to a city of over 3 million inhabitants, and the functional distance between park and city has dramatically decreased. Residential development has progressively expanded against many of the park’s edges, including both informal townships and luxury accommodation.

Luxury Housing along NNP edge, 2010. Photo: Glen Hyman
Luxury Housing along NNP edge, 2010. Photo: Glen Hyman
Housing built just beyond the NNP fence; Southern Bypass to be built along the dirt strip that still separates them. In the foreground is Michael Wanjau, then-Senior Warden for NNP. Photo: Glen Hyman
Housing built just beyond the NNP fence; Southern Bypass is to be built along the dirt strip that still separates them. In the foreground is Michael Wanjau, then-Senior Warden for NNP. Photo: Glen Hyman

Especially along the eastern boundary, heavy industrial activity like cement factories and an oil refinery contribute to a noxious environment where neither wildlife nor people can easily flourish. Clogged roadways now border the park on several sides, and works are underway to widen these to relieve congested traffic conditions.

Such intense urban activity just beside the national park has direct impacts for the health of this natural environment. Industrial and residential effluent require constant monitoring; windblown waste and illegal dumping pollute protected habitat; wildlife are increasingly killed along the heavily trafficked roads that now surround the park; while fence vandalism, illegal encroachment, and bush-meat poaching are other urban problems faced by park managers.

Expansion of Langata Road - NNP on the left, March 2012. Photo: Glen Hyman
Expansion of Langata Road – NNP on the left, March 2012. Photo: Glen Hyman
Dust from a cement factory adjacent to NNP renders vegetation unpalatable to wildlife, 2011. Photo: Glen Hyman
Dust from a cement factory adjacent to NNP renders vegetation unpalatable to wildlife, 2011. Photo: Glen Hyman

To separate the national park from the urban fabric, electric fences were progressively installed to the west, north, and east. Further reinforcing park boundaries, a public-private partnership called Nairobi GreenLine has been working to grow a 50m wide forest of native trees, along 30km of the park’s eastern edge.

As the initiative simple puts it: Nairobi National Park is Under Siege — It’s Time to Draw the Line.

GreenLine MAP: Credit: Nairobi GreenLine , 2010
GreenLine MAP: Credit: Nairobi GreenLine , 2010

It’s important to remember that the initial boundaries of the National Park were fixed by arbitrary conveniences such as a river, a road, and railway. Though only a small portion of the broader ecosystem was included for protection, seasonal wildlife movement was nonetheless able to continue precisely because of the strong connectivity between the park and its wildlife dispersal area. Explicitly for this purpose, the southern edge still retains an open border, allowing free movement of wildlife across the broader landscape. However, the growth of Nairobi shows no sign of slowing, and the long-term viability of these migrations is far from certain.

Fast-growing settlements of Rongai and Kitengela have respectively become established at the southeast and southwest corners of the park. Their persistent expansion continues to consume land that had previously been available for transiting wildlife. Similarly, land-speculation along the entire southern boundary is driving land-prices up, increasing the incentive for owners to subdivide. Over time, the park is slowly being encircled.

Because of the deep interdependence between the Nairobi National Park and the wildlife dispersal area to its south, a southern boundary fence would forever sever the protected area from its ecosystem. Though if privately built fences south of the park were to become sufficiently dense — as they seem on track to become — wildlife would similarly be inhibited from migrating, and the park would become totally isolated from the broader ecosystem it is supposed to support and protect.

Plots for Sale, Kitengela, 2011. Photo: James Canonge
Plots for Sale, Kitengela, 2011. Photo: James Canonge

In an attempt to preserve the needed migration corridors, several important efforts are ongoing. One initiative, known as the “Wildlife Lease Program” works to identify unprotected parcels of land most important for migration, and pays a nominal rent to the landowners in exchange for their commitment to neither subdivide, nor sell, nor fence the property. The lengthy waiting list of individuals that have applied to participate in the scheme is an indication both of this project’s potential, as well as just how much of the migration corridor remains unprotected.

A more general tool for preserving an unfenced landscape, the Kitengela-Isinya-Kipeto Land Use Management Plan is a community-developed planning regulation that restricts the minimum plot-size in much of the dispersal area. Here, the interests of the local community align with conservation aims, and collective efforts are underway to implement this scheme which simultaneously supports pastoral activity and wildlife migration.

While these and other efforts are laudable, urban pressures continue to increase the potential value of land this land south of the park – and the area remains especially and increasingly vulnerable to irreversible change.

On the importance of boundaries

In a sense, the 67-year history of Nairobi National Park can be summarized by two observations about its boundaries. First, the borders of this national park have proven to be a largely effective barrier to landuse change within the protected area. Spatial images illustrate this quite well: the unmistakable growth of urban Nairobi abruptly stops precisely where the national park begins.

NNP Landsat. 1976. Credit: UNEP, 2009, “Kenya: Atlas of Our Changing Environment.” pp. 146-147.
Nairobi is small in 1976, and remains away from the park. NNP Landsat. 1976. Credit: UNEP, 2009, “Kenya: Atlas of Our Changing Environment.” pp. 146-147.
NNP Landsat, 2005. Credit: UNEP, 2009, “Kenya: Atlas of Our Changing Environment.” pp. 146-147.
By 2005, Nairobi urbanization extends all the way to the park border. NNP Landsat, 2005. Credit: UNEP, 2009, “Kenya: Atlas of Our Changing Environment.” pp. 146-147.

Second, however, the area that was protected in 1946 doesn’t very well correspond to the most vulnerable places in 2013. This should not be surprising. After all, this was Kenya’s first protected area — and it was designated at a time when the scale of today’s Nairobi was simply unimaginable. As the capital has expanded — both in terms of its physical footprint and its indirect influence — the mismatch has become all the more consequential.

To secure permanent protection for ecosystem function in this rapidly evolving urban landscape – a reimagining is in order.

The Southern Bypass: a conservation threat?

Traffic congestion is a ubiquitous feature of daily life in Nairobi. Narrow roads are plied each day by an increasing number of private cars, heavy trucks, public busses and mini-van taxis. Crossing town can take hours — wasting human and energy resources, worsening air quality, and generally deteriorating the quality of urban life.

The Government of Kenya is mobilizing many resources to address this problem throughout the Nairobi metro region. These efforts include a network of so-called “bypass” roads, providing alternative routes to especially clogged arteries. One of these projects, the “Southern Bypass,” was approved in 2012 and will run parallel to the boundary of Nairobi National Park.

Under Kenyan law, this project required an Environmental Impact Assessment and a special license from the National Environmental Management Authority (NEMA). A standard and unsurprising condition of this license is that “the proponent shall not encroach on gazetted parks,” specifically Nairobi National Park. However, this condition is being tested in two related respects.

First, over time, the land just beside Nairobi National Park has been occupied by a range of different residential and industrial land uses. While a narrow strip remains available for road construction, the proposed route is insufficiently wide. Second, in one specific place, the proposed road will run perpendicular to the runway of Nairobi’s domestic airport. There, flight safety regulations require more distance between the bypass than is presently available. Together, these reasons have obliged road engineers to design a route that at some points would traverse parts of Nairobi National Park. Accordingly, to comply with the conditions of the NEMA licence, the Kenyan Parliament would need to excise about 150 acres from the park. Local press reports that the loss would eventually be compensated by some 1.8 billion shillings (≈ US$21 million).

On the surface, transforming National Park land into a highway seems like a terrible outcome for nature. To stop this from happening, several local conservation organizations have begun legal proceedings at the National Environmental Tribunal, and indeed, construction has halted while the appeal is under review.

The main arguments of these organizations are as follows:

  • The road would illegally encroach on the currently gazetted Nairobi National Park
  • The project has become much larger than what was evaluated for the EIA
  • The Kenya Wildlife Service has no mandate to negotiate the disposal of park land
  • The integrity of national park boundaries must be respected, forever.
  • Alternative means could allow road construction without traversing the National Park
  • Degazetting park land would set a dangerous precedent and would damage Kenya’s reputation
  • Land has already been allocated for a road; it must be reclaimed from other users.

Some of these arguments raise very important issues, especially the substantive questions about how the proposed transportation project is evolving on the ground. Others appear more tactical in nature, mobilizing political or procedural claims to prevent the proposed construction from going forward. Taken together, their unambiguous objective is to prevent Nairobi National Park from being harmed.

Of course, a vigilant and engaged civil society is an important part of conserving nature. With more and more people concentrated in cities, it is only natural that threats to urban protected areas are so vigorously resisted. However, these very same urban places are also subject to much more complex tradeoffs than wilderness settings would require. Such tradeoffs are politically delicate, but crucial for effective and adaptive stewardship of urban nature.

In this particular case, most arguments against the Southern Bypass also appear to be rooted in an absolute commitment to protecting the integrity of the park boundaries, no matter what. In light of the ever-growing threats that protected areas face, such a conservative position is often quite justified. But again, context truly matters — and maintaining pre-existing boundaries isn’t always the best deal for nature. Given how degraded certain sections of the park have become, how arbitrary the initial boundaries seem to have been, and the mismatch between the areas under protection and those essential for ecosystem function — if leveraged aggressively, this Southern Bypass could also be seen as a conservation opportunity.

The Southern Bypass: A Conservation Opportunity?

Like any policy, nature conservation does not and cannot exist in a vacuum. The hard reality is that, in many respects, the GreenLine initiative has it right: Nairobi National Park is under siege. Along the urban-facing edges, negative impacts are increasingly degrading the protected habitat; and along the southern boundary, if the status quo persists, growing pressure from an expanding city will totally isolate this protected area from its natural ecosystem. Though the current park boundaries are fairly effective at preventing land use change within them — the surrounding landscape is evolving in ways that undermine the sense of that protection.

When viewed in this way, the proposed Southern Bypass should be seen not only as a threat to the National Park — but also as a multifaceted opportunity.

Remaining focused for a moment on the narrow strip of land that might be excised: the traffic congestion in Nairobi truly is dire, and resolving this problem is a top urban priority.  With virtually no alternative routes available, this land along the Nairobi National Park boundary is tremendously valuable. It is a true asset, which can shrewdly be leveraged to support the park’s overall conservation.

Looking more broadly at edge conditions, decades of relaxed planning regulation seem to have allowed areas beside the National Park to be occupied by a land uses that are entirely inappropriate neighbors for a protected area. The negative impacts they cause are in some cases so severe that neither wildlife nor people are able to occupy the areas. With no real hope of moving these industries away from the park, one viable solution for better edge protection is to create a new buffer from existing park land. In some places, the forest proposed by Nairobi GreenLine is an example of how this is being done. In other sections, it’s worth asking whether and how an appropriately built roadway could serve a similar function.

Unsurprisingly, the land within protected area boundaries is often coveted for other uses, and this is not the kind of tradeoff to be made lightly. Decisions should be informed by the best available science, and in case of doubt over the conservation value of affected areas, the precautionary principle should prevail. But if it turns out such a bargain would yield significant, permanent gains for conservation it would be foolish to dismiss the opportunity out of hand.

From a landscape perspective, the most pressing threat to Nairobi National Park does not really depend on the exact location of its northern boundaries. Rather, the future of this protected area hinges instead on how the area south to its south will develop. As it looks now, the prognosis is fairly bleak.

In this light, the real opportunity of the Southern Bypass is to reimagine the size and shape of Nairobi National Park — expanding its protection to the most vulnerable places, thanks to the value of some its most degraded parcels.

In so rapidly changing an urban setting — where events are quickly overtaking the existing conservation geography — what sense does it really make to tightly preserve the precise locations of historical park boundaries? By virtue of the resources available for constructing this road infrastructure, the proposed Southern Bypass offers a rare opportunity to broadly renegotiate the form and function of Nairobi National Park. This opportunity should be seized, and the net gains for conservation should be measured not in terms of individual parcels, but rather, in terms of long-term ecosystem function.

  • How broad a migration corridor would need protection to permanently facilitate seasonal wildlife movement?
  • What other benefits would this protection have for the practice of traditional pastoralism in the dispersal area?
  • Would such gains make for a worthwhile tradeoff?

For the future health of Nairobi National Park — and by extension, the wellbeing of all Nairobians — I’d strongly suggest that such questions are worth considering.

Glen Hyman
Paris

 

 

 

Réinventer Paris: A Competition to Write History with Nature in Paris

Many voices. Greener cities. Better cities.

Réinventer Paris”, or “Reinventing Paris”, the architectural program initiated by Anne Hildago (the Socialist mayor of the French capital) in autumn 2014 does not lack ambition.

Though the diverse composition of Réinventer Paris’ contemporary urban planning teams should be the norm, in reality, it is a novelty.
When I first heard about it, I was surprised and couldn’t really believe it until spring 2015, when I was convoked by two teams to support them in designing a visionary project with biodiverse green infrastructure for this competition.

What was the content of this program? The objectives were to highlight innovation and to “do better and differently”. Let us remember Hildago’s fascinating words relating to the program—that she wants diverse teams, and that those teams should propose visionary projects that surpass any existing standards:

“The teams will consist of original and unconventional groups in which all disciplines can be represented, reinventing our ways of living, working, exchanging and sharing in Paris”.

This statement, like many others of hers, opens a new area and perception of how a city can make demands and, therefore, drive changes.

The architectural competition focused on the transformation of 23 areas of Paris. The council received 650 proposals for projects. At the end of the process, 22 sites (the 23rd was abandoned) found winners. The first achievements should be completed between 2018 and 2020, as part of the entry requirements for the competition included having willing investors from the get-go. The projects are diverse, as one of the requirements of this program was that the teams be diverse and inter-/transdisciplinary. Architecture offices had to look for team members if they wanted to apply for this competition, including: sociologists, ecologists, biologists, philosophers, engineers, agro-urban ecologists, social associations, NGOs, and others. Though in theory this should be the normal composition for contemporary urban planning teams, in reality, it is absolutely a novelty.

While many star architects answered the call of this competition, only a few of them won a project. Some of the projects will set precedents for new architectural models, while others will show existing technologies in new combinations or multifunctional usages.

Project examples

Some of the projects will be built on bare plots; others will replace existing infrastructure, such as parking lots or warehouses. Finally, a number of projects will modify and retrofit existing buildings. Some of the sites contemplate goals such as zero waste, zero carbon neighbourhoods; organic agriculture (such as ecological agriculture and permaculture); and green infrastructures. Green infrastructure will be designed in almost all of the 22 sites, bringing one form of nature back into the city.

Several buildings will be constructed of wood, such as the project planning to rehabilitate the railway station Masséna in the 13th borough (arrondissement), already named “Babel’s ecological tower“ by several news media outlets.

emblematique_phase_2_vue_a_04carree_cba1d
IN VIVO. Conception : Xtu Architectes. Image: http://www.reinventer.paris

Several projects will be carried out near the ring road that encircles the center of Paris. Thus, a thousand trees will connect Porte Maillot in Neuilly. It will have a milfoil structure. The upper floors will be for housing, while the lower ones will be offices.

emblematique_mille_arbres_vue_de_nuit_0698d
Milles arbres / A thousand trees — Conception: Sou Fujimoto Architects / Manal Rachdi, Oxo Architectes / Moz Landscape / Atelier Paul Arène, landscaper / Pierre-Alexandre Risser Horticulture & Jardins, paysagiste. Image: http://www.reinventer.paris

At another site, Ternes-Villiers, vegetated towers will be constructed along the bitumen, in an arboreal environment.

emblematique_ter_01_8f395
La ville Multi strate / The Multi Strata City — Ternes-Villiers-Champeret. Conception: Jacques Ferrier Architectures / Chartier Dalix Architectes / SLA Landscapers. Image: http://www.reinventer.paris

La Ferme du Rail

I’m going to present one of the laureates for which I know some of the team members. The project is called “La Ferme du Rail” (The Railway Farmhouse). In my opinion, it is one of the most interesting projects. Situated in the 19th arrondissement, a socially challenging borough, this team is going to create a space for encounters around urban agriculture (organic and permaculture), a space for education and further education; accommodation; and food production. It revolves around a community of people in integration (professional / social) as well as horticulture students. It develops market-gardening activities in short circuits, valuing the organic waste in the city. Its goal is to minimize the need for energy resources, food, and financial resources by the implementation of a circular economy.

emblematique_fdr_vue_generalecrop_3b081
La ferme du Rail / Railway Farmhouse. Conception: Clara Simay, architecte et Amo développement durable / Link architecte / Mélanie Drevet paysagiste / Philippe Pieger, agro-écologue urbain. Image: http://www.reinventer.paris

Borne out of the desire of residents and associations of the 19th arrondissement, which want to grow a place that combines urban agriculture and solidarity, “La Ferme du Rail” is the integration of people who fall between the cracks of the social grid. It integrates into the social tissue of the neighborhood and generates a service—agricultural production—that simultaneously creates jobs.

fig5In theory, “La Ferme du Rail” represents a model of sustainable economy and social solidarity linked to the interdependence between project stakeholders and residents. It relies on the skills of each, which are known to reinforce each other, for the benefit of the neighborhood.

The activities of the farm will be organized in local and territorial exchange networks. Farmers offer the residents a range of services: collection and treatment of local organic waste, gardening, catering, selling vegetables, organizing workshops and events, and maintaining green, biodiverse spaces.

Welcoming everyone, “La Ferme du Rail” will feature a restaurant and a grocery-primeur, places for the tasting and sale of products of the farm and partner farmers. It is also intended to be a place of awareness that addresses the urgent need for meetings and discussions around nature in the city and the alternative food supply.

Whether training in gardening and composting activities, disseminating information on reasoned agriculture or organic farming, or the exchange of best practices around urban ecology, “La Ferme du Rail” will be a resource for social and cultural exchanges, whose residents—and those throughout Paris—can enter freely.

Writing history, changing paradigms?

Why do I write about this? My motivation is my ongoing thinking and concerns about how we can transform today’s society today into a sustainable society for the 21st century: whose responsibility is it to take the first step? Why do we still have so many blockages?

When I see what is going to happen in the next few years in Paris, and what has already happened, I keep believing and keep hoping that it is possible to change and that one person can be the engine to start such a shift; not everything within the proposed “La Ferme du Rail” is going to work, but the project may serve as a model for more possibilities, acting as one part in a new sustainable and visionary chapter in history.

Of course, it is also a big, challenging project in the sense that not all techniques of construction or productions (urban farms, urban permaculture, etc.), or complex levels of participation, were “tested” or experienced until very recently. But this is completely part of the project—to have a model and to enter into new territories of trials and errors. It is not possible to know already all the answers and solutions to such projects, which have never happened before. The projects need now to enact their first steps; they will encounter problems, but will also find solutions and grow as a result. The multidisciplinary nature of the teams will further support finding solutions, because different perspectives will be involved and will be discussed: technical, logistical, economical, ecological, and social.

The city of Paris will accompany the realizations of these projects, document them, and monitor the projects to keep them on track to fulfill what they promised as laureates. It’s not going to be an easy path for all these winner teams, but I believe that this process of debate and discussion is vital in order to start to make changes together.

I believe that this program will have an emblematic role and support a change in planning in the future, and will successfully integrate solutions for supporting “Nature in the City“, because it is comparable, at some levels, with what happened in Basel City—my city—with the biodiverse Green Roof initiative and, later, the law for Green Roofs. It was the city that decided to bring in this change, with several steps over several years. What was very important in all these initiatives was to show examples of realized biodiverse green roofs, to prove that it is absolutely possible to design and install biodiverse green roofs. The key to this is, as soon as people see that the green product or solution works, it will start a movement of changes, which will have a positive impact on citizens, the economy and education.

Nathalie Baumann
Basel

On The Nature of Cities

Relocating Industry to Address Air Pollution in Beijing

Many voices. Greener cities. Better cities.

Beijing, China’s capital, has been experiencing serious air pollution in recent years.

Industrial relocation is an effective way to reduce carbon emissions and improve air quality—as long as employees are well cared for in the transition.

Greenhouse gas emissions from industry, coal heating, and vehicles are believed to be three major causes of the city’s air pollution.

Beginning over a decade ago, Beijing Municipal Government began to take targeted actions to control air pollution. Among different measures adopted, relocating polluting industries out of town is a major climate action that I’d like to highlight here.

Fig. 1 Contribution of major causes of air pollution in Beijing (2013). Image: news.cnr.cn

The government is taking stringent actions

According to the “Beijing Clean Air Action Plan 2013-2017”, polluting industries should be phased out in the city by 2017 via different measures, such as relocation, structural readjustment, and shutting down. By the end of 2016, more than 1,200 polluting plants were removed from Beijing. These plants are primarily engaged in heavy industry, such as steel and cement manufacturing; chemical and petrochemical production; and building materials in foundries. China’s steel making giant, the Shougang Steel Group [1], was one of the first plants to be relocated out of the city.

Fig. 2 A corner of the Shougang Steel Group before relocation. Image: tech.hexun.com

Challenges and solutions of industrial relocation: the case of Shougang

Established in 1919 in Beijing, the Shougang Steel Group is one of the biggest steel manufacturing companies in China. It employs over 80,000 workers, with an annual production capacity of steel exceeding 15 million tons. The proposal of relocating the steel giant from Beijing to other regions was raised and approved by the government in the early 2000s. Formal relocation processes began in 2005, and were accomplished by 2012. Now, the main parts of the company—the steel manufacturing plants—have been moved to two other places in surrounding Hebei Province: Cao Feidian and Qianan, over 200 kilometers away from Beijing. The vacated land in Beijing was renamed the High-End Comprehensive Industrial Service Area of New Shougang (HECISANS). The managers of HECISANS are committed to taking a pathway of low-carbon and green development—it was recognized as China’s first Climate Positive Program by the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group at the second US-China Climate Leaders Summit in Beijing. HECISANS occupies an area of 8.63km2, and aims to transform into clusters of cultural and creative industry, service industry, and high-end manufacturing. There are many challenges for the relocation of such a big company. The greatest challenge of all is the distribution and allocation of employees, as Mr. Zhu Jimin, former president of Shougang Steel Group, acknowledged.

Fig. 3 Plan of HECISANS. Image: www.shougang.com.cn

This challenge is especially poignant because of a loss of jobs due to structural adjustment and the reduction of steel output. To distribute and allocate employees properly, the Shougang management team adopted the following strategies: 1) Mobilize the backbone, moving skilled and young workers to the new factories in Cao Feidian and Qianan, offering to give appropriately increased wages and better housing conditions. 2) Use the vacated land in Beijing to develop clusters of high-end, non-polluting industries, which can then absorb part of the employees. 3) Allocate those who are old, weak, ill, and disabled to work in logistics positions. 4) Terminate the employment of some workers on a voluntary basis, and pay financial compensation to the laid-off workers in accordance with national laws and regulations. Once Shougang took these approaches, the relocation of employees proceeded smoothly, without causing major social unrest in Beijing.

Fig. 4 The launch of China Animation City Program in the steelmaking plant of Shougang Image: www.gov.cn

Observations

Industry is, in many cities and especially in the developing world, a major source of greenhouse gas emissions. For this reason, industrial relocation is regarded as an effective way to reduce urban carbon emissions and improve air quality. However, in completing such relocations, we need to bear in mind some common principles that can make the program more demonstrably successful in the long run.

  1. It’s critical that the relocated companies meet emissions standards and environmental protection norms in their new locations, and not simply shift pollution problems to the new locations. Air pollution problems should be addressed in a regional manner; air quality can only be controlled and, ultimately, solved by coordinated regional efforts.
  1. Companies must properly distribute and allocate employees, especially disadvantaged workers and those who are laid off. It’s important to have consensus among various stakeholders that companies need to pay a resettlement compensation reflecting the real market value of their employees, and they have a responsibility to provide necessary help to assist the unemployed in getting back in the workforce again, for example, by offering vocational training, job fairs, guidance for private business, and so on.
  1. Companies must make full use of the land they are vacating. The previous land occupied by the polluting companies should be assessed and meticulously planned. It should be renovated and restored according to the degree of contamination, and to the extent that it shall not cause any damage to future users. The reclaimed land might be utilized for open and public space, or for high-end and non-polluting industries, such as is exemplified by Shougang Steel Group.

According to statistics, the relocation of the Shougang Steel Group contributes to the reduction of 18,000 tons of inhalable particles (pm) every year, which accounts for about 20 percent of the total pm emissions in the city [2]. Citizens in Beijing feel that industrial relocation does have some effect in addressing air pollution. However, the effect is not obvious, as previously expected. The main reason for this is that air pollution is caused by multiple factors, and it should also be addressed by comprehensive approaches. For Beijing, the strategy of industrial relocation should combine with other measures—such as control of vehicles, restriction of coal heating, and management of the dust—to ensure a consistent result.

Pengfei XIE
Beijing

On The Nature of Cities

[1] http://www.shougang.com.cn/sgweb/cszhfws/index.jhtml

[2] http://www.chinanews.com/olympic/news/2008/08-04/1334236.shtml

Renaturing Malta through Collaborations for Nature-based Solutions

Many voices. Greener cities. Better cities.
Malta was the EU member state with the highest number of citizens—81 percent—who favoured prioritizing urban greening measures.
With an area of just 316 Km2and a population of more than 475,000, Malta is the smallest member country of the European Union (EU). This island state has been moulded through human action since the first recorded human settlement more than 7000 years ago. Today, more than 30 percent of land cover consists of built-up areas and more than 50 percent is considered agricultural land. However, this is rapidly changing as Malta is currently experiencing increased economic growth, tourism, and is showing strong immigration and urbanisation trends. 94.6 percent of the population currently lives in urban areas.

This context makes Malta an interesting case-study for the study of urban ecosystems and cultural landscapes. With greater competition for space between urban and industrial development, the need to assess the availability for green infrastructure has become more pressing. How does accessibility to green infrastructure, and the benefits it provides to people, vary in different spaces? What are the impacts on human well-being and do these affect one part of society more than another? These are some of the questions that researchers have been working on in Malta.

Valletta, the capital city of Malta and a UNESCO World Heritage Site, is located in an urban agglomeration characterised with a high population density and strong tourism and commercial development. Photo: Mario Balzan

A recent study has looked at access to green infrastructure and how the use of these services has led to social, economic, and environmental benefits. This study found a strong gradient in terms of green infrastructure availability from rural to urban areas. And, as a consequence, the capacity of ecosystems to provide benefits to society is lower in urban centres. In contrast, research suggests various important contributions derived from urban green spaces. These include the reduction of ambient temperatures through shading and evapotranspiration, opportunities for recreation, reduction of flooding by limiting stormwater runoff, and the removal of air pollutants by vegetation. A recent study using the outdoor game Geocaching, described as the world’s largest treasure hunt, has shown the importance of these spaces for recreation. Results from Malta indicate that the highest number of caches were placed and searched for in urban areas, and that geocaching is strongly associated with the presence and accessibility of urban green infrastructure.

The Lower Barrakka Gardens in Valletta. A historical urban garden and a recreational and touristic site in the capital city. Photo: Mario Balzan
Hundreds of residents have recently gathered in Valletta in a demonstration in favour of the environment and the protection of trees and green spaces. Photo: Mario Balzan

The implication is that there is a strong need for land use planning to promote the use of nature-based solutions to develop a green infrastructure network in urban areas, and by doing so, significantly contribute to support biodiversity and ecosystem services flows leading to benefits to society.

The need for improved use of nature-based solutions also appears to be strongly felt by Maltese citizens, who were the most likely in the EU be in favour of the promotion and use of nature-based solutions with 95% of the Maltese participants in a recent Eurobarometer survey being favour of the EU promoting nature-based solutions throughout Europe. This was higher than the EU average of 83% of the respondents.  In the same survey, Malta was also the EU member state with the highest fraction of citizens favouring urban greening measures. When asked whether there are enough natural features in the area where the respondent lives, and if they would like more or if they would not mind if there were less, 81% of the Maltese respondents wanted more natural features whilst only 18% said that there is enough of them (only 1% would not mind if there were less). This is higher than the EU average of 53% of the participants favouring more natural features in their residential areas. The Maltese respondents were also more likely (76%) to favour the use of nature-based solutions over technological solutions to improve the environment and the economy, and to address social issues, when compared with the EU average (60%).

Researchers at the Malta College of Arts, Science and Technology (MCAST) saw this as an opportunity to launch a research initiative—by working closely with policy-makers, businesses and stakeholders, they will develop a research strategy and build a research and innovation cluster to advance the development and uptake of nature-based solutions.

These are some of the goals of the recently funded project ReNature “Promoting research excellence in nature-based solutions for innovation, sustainable economic growth and human well-being in Malta”. ReNature is a Twinning project of the Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme. This twinning collaboration aims at significantly strengthening nature-based solutions research at the MCAST as the coordinator of the project by linking it with internationally-leading research institutions in other EU Member States.

The ReNature project partners: ReNature brings together researchers from a total of five countries to establish twinning collaborations to stimulate knowledge exchange and nurture a new generation of scientists and practitioners around an emerging nature-based solutions cluster for Malta. Photo: Pensoft

During ReNature, Maltese researchers collaborate with partners from Ireland, Italy, the United Kingdom and Bulgaria. This collaboration is expected to offer an opportunity to increase the institution and national research capacity within this sector, link up with existing initiatives and projects, develop a national research community with strong international collaborations, and develop new practical solutions.

Through capacity-building and knowledge synthesis about nature’s benefits and nature-based solutions, and by developing a strong collaboration with policy and businesses, the ReNature researchers aim to foster a culture of evidence-based environmental decision-making and planning for human well-being.This ambitious project aims to make Malta a strong research and innovation player in the emerging field of nature-based solutions, thereby providing an opportunity to develop and test new technical and policy solutions in an urbanised island environment.

The Kick-Off meeting of the ReNature project was held on the 25 October 2018 at the Institute of Applied Sciences of the Malta College of Arts, Science and Technology. During the meeting, the project was introduced to stakeholders through a number of thematic talks focusing on the need for research excellence for nature-based solutions, the integration of ecosystem services and knowledge synthesis in urban planning and environmental decision-making, and the steps to transform research outcomes into practice in policy and business. This was followed by an open discussion about the contributions of research to the development and application of nature-based solutions and actions required for the development of a network of researchers, practitioners and interested members of the public. The ReNature kick-off meeting also offered an opportunity for practitioners to exchange knowledge and discuss collaborations in less formal settings.

The ReNature Kick-Off meeting, held in October 2018, has offered the first opportunity for knowledge exchange between the project partners and Maltese stakeholders, researchers and students. Photo: MCAST

Given the complexity of the environmental systems, which increase the risk of inadequate or contested decisions or of not properly implementing policies, a stronger knowledge and evidence base is considered as being crucial for the design and implementation of decisions, credibility, and uptake by stakeholders and citizens. ReNature brings together individuals and organisations possessing relevant knowledge in various areas of expertise to participate in a research and innovation nature-based solutions cluster of interconnected companies and institutions linked by commonalities and complementarities. Clustering at a local and regional levels enables the contributing stakeholders to exploit their synergies and complementarity, leading to benefits such as knowledge transfer, preservation of community values and lifestyle improvement.

The creation of the research and innovation nature-based solutions cluster, which collaborates within a strong international network of stakeholders and adopts research-to-practice approaches, is a long-term goal of the ReNature partners and collaborators. This will be achieved through a series of meetings and workshops that identify knowledge needs whilst supporting collaborative research with stakeholders from the national and international scientific and practitioner communities. The development of strong collaborations with stakeholders from policy and business is therefore seen as being critical for the development of a research and innovation nature-based solutions cluster for knowledge co-creation and sharing, thus promoting the mainstreaming of nature-based solutions across all policy-relevant sectors.

The creation of a continuous and iterative cycle of innovation, based on the needs of society for new knowledge and applications, is critical for renaturing cities. Within this cycle, the importance of sharing of knowledge and scientific outcomes in open-source repositories and the role of young researchers to foster the long-term capacity for innovation and new ideas should not be underestimated. Essentially, ReNature wants to renature Malta through collaborations that promote the long-term use of nature-based solutions and thus to have an amplified impact on environmental decisions, landscape planning and the uptake of solutions in businesses.

Mario Balzan
Malta

On The Nature of Cities

Follow us on twitter @ReNature_H2020 for more details and updated information about the ReNature events. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 809988.

 

 

Renewable Rikers as a Blueprint for a Sustainable City

Many voices. Greener cities. Better cities.
Renewable Rikers is an opportunity to end an old, but ongoing wrong. For too long, New York City has disproportionately sited its polluting infrastructure in low-income communities and communities of color.
On 29 January 2019, New York City Council held a hearing on a trio of bills collectively known as “Renewable Rikers”. Rikers is currently home to the most infamous prison in New York City—the Rikers Island correctional facility an island penal colony with one lone bridge connecting it to the rest of the City. Introduced by the Council’s Environmental Committee Chair Costa Constantinides, these bills would remove Rikers Island from the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections, while simultaneously authorizing two feasibility studies: one on the feasibility of locating solar generation and battery storage on Rikers island, and the other on the feasibility of relocating four aging waste water treatment facilities to the island.

A New York city council meeting.

The idea behind these three bills is to tie the pending shutdown of the Rikers Island correctional facility to restorative environmental justice in the communities most impacted by incarceration on the island. Calling Rikers Island “a symbol of brutality and inhumanity” for many New Yorkers, City Council Speaker Corey Johnson opened the Renewable Rikers hearing with a full-throated support for the proposal. Not to be outdone, Mayor Bill de Blasio announced his intention to issue an executive order detailing a “participatory planning effort” for re-imagining Rikers Island.

The journey to this moment was more than a century in the making.

Rikers Island has been associated with some of the most racially problematic aspects of New York history.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:USGS_Rikers_Island.png

Part of the traditional territory of the Rockaway Tribe, the island bears the name of a slaveholding Dutch family (originally Rycken but anglicized to Rikers) who exploited enslaved people to build a fortune, which they then parlayed into social prominence. Yet even as the Rikers socialized with New York’s political elite, their name cast a dark shadow over New York City. Richard Riker, New York City’s first district attorney and City Recorder (the municipal officer in charge of the criminal courts) was infamous for abusing the Fugitive Slave Act and using his position to sell black New Yorkers into slavery.

Abolitionist David Ruggles, head of the New York Vigilance Committee, frequently condemned Recorder Riker for his willingness to find that free New Yorkers were actually slaves, and for his role in returning escaped slaves to the South.

1835 cartoon by Edward Clay. Image Courtesy of Periodyssey.com  [Ruggles is the center figure]
Riker’s activities were so notorious that he and his police confederates became known as “the kidnapping club”. Even as black New York saw Rikers as “the spider at the center of a web of injustice” his abusive conduct did not put a dent his good name among white New Yorkers. After his death, the New York Times described Riker as a “good, kind-hearted judge,” and in the eyes of his white contemporaries, Riker was a near saintly man.

The parallel between Recorder Rikers’ conduct and the racially-charged abuses of power at the present-day Rikers Island correctional facility are striking. The era of mass incarceration saw black and brown New Yorkers imprisoned and abused at Rikers Island while for too long the white portions of the City largely noticed nothing amiss.

In recent years, Riker’s Island gained notoriety because of the shockingly high levels of violence, abuse, and neglect that inmates suffered there. In 2013, Mother Jones ranked Rikers as one of the ten worst prisons in the United States. Numerous reports and exposes documented gratuitous and excessive patterns of violence at Rikers, with force being used in a fashion “intended to harm rather than restrain and control inmates”.

The tragic case of 16 year old Kalief Browder came to symbolize the Lord of the Flies nature of the “cycle of unchecked violence” at Rikers. Browder was held for three years at Rikers, from 2010 to 2013, awaiting his constitutionally-guaranteed “speedy” trial  on a minor theft charge. Browder spent two of those years in solitary confinement. Surveillance footage showed Browder suffering assaults at the hands of prison guards and inmates alike. When the charges against him were dropped, Brower was released. But his Rikers experience had been so traumatizing that Browder later committed suicide. Browder’s experience galvanized public calls for reform, and became a rallying cry for advocates bent on closing Rikers.

The next year, then-US Attorney Preet Bharara issued a scathing report on the “deep-seated culture of violence” among the guards and staff at Rikers Island. Bharara characterized the jail as “broken”, with a pattern and practice that violates constitutional rights. Bharara’s Report gave added impetus to a grass roots movement organized under the banner #CloseRikers.

Closing Rikers became seen as “a moral imperative”. The Report of Independent Commission on New York City Criminal Justice and Incarceration Reform (the Lippman Report) characterized Riker’s Island as “a stain on our great City,” and recommended permanently ending the use of Rikers Island as a jail facility.

The Commission explicitly acknowledged that racial injustice played a significant role in the harms done at Rikers Island.

In Fall of 2019, New York City Council voted to close Rikers Island and replace it with four smaller jails by 2026. Mayor de Blasio declared “The era of mass incarceration is OVER in New York City.”

The Lippman Report called for any post-prison planning for Rikers Island to take restorative justice into account.  The Report also raised the possibility that Rikers Island could contribute to the sustainability of New York City.

Starting from that rather vague suggestion, a coalition of scholars, politicians and advocates developed the Renewable Rikers proposal as a way to promote restorative environmental justice.

The proposal would dedicate Rikers Island to wastewater treatment and sustainable energy generation in order to phase out noxious facilities sited in the environmental justice communities most impacted by incarceration on Rikers.

After two years of work and advocacy, New York City Council held its historic “Renewable Rikers” hearing.  Environmental justice groups, formerly incarcerated individuals, and various lawyers and academics testified in favor of the proposal. Nobody testified against it.

Closing Rikers will be a transformative moment for the City. Renewable Rikers could make that moment an environmental justice transformation as well. These proposed laws are a critical first step. By enacting them, City Council will launch a visioning process for truly restorative environmental justice.

Renewable Rikers is a path to a more sustainable, more equitable City. New York State recently committed to 100% carbon-free electricity by 2040. To reach that goal, the City will have to transition away from fossil fuels. Replacing the City’s dirty and aging Peaker plants with clean energy is a good start. Peaker plants are gas-fired power plants that only turn on during peak power demand. They start and shut frequently, rarely running for more than a few hours at a time. Startup and shutdown are the moments in which power plants emissions are the dirtiest. These Peaker plants disproportionately sited in marginalized communities, and their replacement is both an environmental necessity and a public health imperative. Peaker plants contribute to the localized air pollution that harms people’s health in overburdened, frontline communities. Some South Bronx neighborhoods that host Peaker plants have childhood asthma hospitalization rates double the City’s average. For example, pollution-related emergency department visits and asthma hospitalizations in Mott Haven and Melrose are triple the NYC average. Replacing dirty Peaker plants with renewable generation and storage on Rikers would improve air quality in these front-line communities.

Harlem River Yard Peaker plant http://cdn.nycitynewsservice.com/blogs.dir/8/files/2015/09/Harlem-River-Yard-web.jpg

Renewable Rikers is an opportunity to end an old, but ongoing wrong. For too long, New York City has disproportionately sited its polluting infrastructure in low-income communities and communities of color. The 2000 Power Now! Project is a clear example. The New York Power Authority used Enron’s engineered brown outs across California to justify adding 10 peaker plants in New York City on an emergency basis—running roughshod over frontline communities to do so. These plants were all sited in environmental justice communities with no community engagement, virtually no environmental due diligence, and over vociferous community objections. Although these plants were pitched as temporary, a 3-year emergency solution to a manufactured crisis—they are still there. Anyone born the year they were installed is eligible to vote and nearly old enough to drink.

By seizing this opportunity to transform Rikers Island into sustainable infrastructure, New York City can right this old wrong. The Peaker plants could be shuttered and the land currently devoted to energy generation returned to these front-line communities for greenspace, affordable housing, or other locally-determined priorities.  A recent Ravenswood power plant project shows that 316 MW of storage can be sited on 7 acres of land. Two such storage sites could provide more capacity than all the Power Now! plants combined.

Image from Ravenswood Energy Storage Project Expanded Environmental Assessment, submitted to the NY Public Service Commission.

By siting battery storage, solar generation, and wastewater treatment facilities on Rikers Island and moving these facilities out of environmental justice communities, Renewable Rikers leverages the transformation of the criminal justice system into wider transformation across multiple axes of justice. It benefits the City as a whole, while specifically benefiting the communities most impacted by mass incarceration, and incarceration at Rikers.

Enacting Renewable Rikers would be a moment for environmental justice. The proposed bills before the New York City Council would improve air quality for environmental justice communities, which are frequently the same communities most impacted by mass incarceration, and by incarceration at Rikers.

Enacting Renewable Rikers would be a moment for climate justice. The proposed bills would help ensure a just transition that reduces the burdens on frontline communities.

Enacting Renewable Rikers would be a moment for restorative justice. Solar installer and wind turbine technician are the two fastest growing job categories in the United States (albeit from a small base.) Renewable Rikers can create jobs with a pathway to prosperity for everyone—specifically for those most impacted by mass incarceration, and by incarceration at Rikers.

As plans for Rikers’ future mature, appropriate oversight mechanisms will be key to making sure that this project benefits the communities most impacted by Rikers and by environmental racism. Enacting the proposals currently before City Council would help ensure that closing Rikers does not devolve into a privatization land grab. The communities most impacted by incarceration at Rikers, and by environmental racism, must be part of the process. If these communities are consulted early and often, and that their representatives are part of whatever decision-making bodies will ultimately make choices about Renewable Rikers, it might indeed be the dawn of a new day for New York City energy generation.

Rebecca Bratspies
New York

On The Nature of Cities

 

 

Repenser la protection de la nature dans le contexte des Objectifs du Développement Durable
Rethinking Nature Protection in the Context of the Sustainable Development Goals

Many voices. Greener cities. Better cities.

Read this in English.

Repenser la protection de la nature dans le contexte des Objectifs du Développement Durable en articulant action locale et régionale avec les politiques nationales et internationales

Aujourd’hui, les zones de nature ordinaire — parfois appelées paysages productifs — sont les plus menacées par la pollution, par des systèmes d’exploitation non durables, mais aussi par notre négligence.

Un constat sans appel

Sur la base des listes rouges produites par l’UICN, le Chief scientist de l’IUCN, Thomas Brooks alerte sur le rythme sans précédent de l’érosion de la biodiversité auquel nous assistons. Nous savons également qu’alors que notre subsistance dépend pour 95% de sols cultivés, 52% d’entre eux sont dégradés ou terriblement dégradés. C’est dans ce contexte, alors que la première partie du dernier rapport du GIEC vient d’être rendue publique, que va s’ouvrir à Marseille, le Congrès mondial de la Nature. A cette occasion, lors de l’Assemblée de ses membres, l’UICN se prononcera sur la possible adhésion des collectivités locales à l’Union. Ce Congrès s’inscrit sur la route qui relie Edimbourg à la 15ème Conférence des Parties à la Convention sur la Diversité Biologique (CoP15 de la CBD) et au 7ème Sommet Mondial de la Biodiversité des Gouvernements Locaux et Infranationaux, à l’heure où les discussions sur le renouvellement, le renforcement des plans d’actions des gouvernements infranationaux, des villes et des autres autorités locales vont bon train.

Pour préparer le Congrés de l’UICN, quatre webinaires ont été organisés avec le soutien du projet Post 2020 Biodiversity Framework – EU support, financé par l’Union européenne et mis en œuvre par Expertise France, et de l’Office Français de la Biodiversité (OFB). Ils se sont tenus les 22, 23, 29 et 30 juin, chacun correspondant à une thématique.

Foret Fontainebleau. Photo: Mairie de Fontainebleau

Des territoires de nature ?

Les trois premiers webinaires traitent des différents types de territoires[1] du point de vue de la nature qui les recouvre. Ils s’intéressent à la nature en termes d’actions à conduire par les gouvernements locaux et infranationaux pour la protéger, la maintenir en bon état et la restaurer quand elle est trop dégradée.

1. Les territoires de nature exceptionnelle

Les territoires de nature exceptionnelle sont tous ceux qui font l’objet d’une protection. Quand les premières protections sont mises en place à la fin du XIXème siècle, on voit déjà que ce qui les motive est lié aux usages. Ainsi, la première zone de nature protégée au monde, est Fontainebleau en 1861, où est créée une réserve artistique – pour que les Peintres de Barbizon puissent continuer de capturer la beauté du monde et la fixer sur une toile. Vient ensuite Yellowstone en 1872, le premier parc national créé pour protéger cette étendue de toute exploitation et prédation. Depuis plus d’un siècle, ces espaces recouvrent une surface de plus en plus importante. Leur gestion nous en apprend tous les jours sur le fonctionnement du vivant. Ce sont des espaces « pilotes », des « laboratoires » où l’on apprend à protéger la nature, à en prendre soin, à la restaurer aussi.

Crédit : Yellowstone par James St-John

Des témoignages des intervenants disponibles ici ressortent trois enseignements majeurs :

a) Protéger durablement les espaces naturels remarquables nécessite de prendre en compte tous les besoins des personnes qui vivent sur ces territoires. Ainsi en est-il de la fréquentation touristique, qui doit être encadrée pour maintenir un équilibre durable entre préservation de la nature et emploi pour les populations locales. C’est également vrai pour les espaces verts de la Ville du Cap qui veille à associer les citadins dès la conception de ses projets urbains.

b) Pour être efficaces, les labels de protection les plus prestigieux, décernés par des organes ou institutions internationaux devraient prévoir d’associer plus étroitement et de façon pérenne les gouvernements infranationaux à même de mettre en place les modes de gestion pragmatiques permettant d’encadrer la fréquentation des sites ou leur accessibilité par exemple.

c) Quand les gouvernements infranationaux sont impliqués dans la protection des espaces remarquables, les protéger créée une dynamique pour l’ensemble du territoire. Ainsi en est-il de la Ville de Saint François qui, partant de la protection du site de la Pointe des Châteaux, a engagé une politique de protection de la nature qui dépasse le seul périmètre de ce lieu remarquable.

Crédit : Parc Naturel mondial, Richard Weller

Toutefois, la rapidité avec laquelle le changement climatique affecte les écosystèmes planétaires impose d’accélérer la reconnexion des espaces naturels protégés. Richard Weller, titulaire de la Chaire Meyerson d’urbanisme à la Weitzman School of Design de l’Université de Pennsylvanie, souligne ce paradoxe : alors que les humains ont déployé des trésors d’intelligence pour assurer leurs déplacements et ceux de leurs biens et marchandises, la connexion des espaces protégés est inexistante, interdisant aux espèces tout déplacement. Tandis que nous nous sommes fixés comme objectif de protéger 17% des aires terrestres avec les cibles d’Aichi, Richard Weller rappelle qu’il existe aujourd’hui 867 zones protégées dans le monde.  Ensemble, elles représentent environ 15% de la surface terrestre, soit une différence de 1 ou 2% avec l’objectif fixé. Toutefois, ce sont autant d’archipels isolés les uns des autres. A travers le projet de Parc Naturel mondial, le chercheur propose de créer une ligne du nord au sud du continent américain (la « Pataska », allant de la Patagonie à l’Alaska), une autre de la Libye à l’Afrique du Sud, et une troisième du Maroc jusqu’à l’Asie centrale et l’Australie. Ces trois lignes permettraient de regrouper 19 des 36 hotspots, ce qui recouvre 55 nations et 160 000 km au total. Ce nouvel ensemble constituerait un parc naturel mondial : le « World Park Project ». Ces lignes rouges pourraient devenir des chemins de randonnée et former une sorte d’infrastructure verte : des routes ou des chemins dans une ville pourraient mener à des parcs, conduisant à des zones cultivées puis à des zones protégées, etc.

Dans la vision de Richard Weller, il ne s’agit pas simplement de zones de promenade ou de randonnée, mais aussi d’espaces où l’on peut travailler, amener les gens à voir ce qu’il se passe – à l’inverse des parcs naturels tels qu’on les concevait autrefois, dont les visiteurs étaient exclus. Ce parc naturel mondial ne vise pas à renforcer les zones protégées actuelles mais à protéger celles qui se situent dans les zones intermédiaires, sur lesquelles nous devons travailler pour pouvoir restaurer les connexions – et de le faire à l’échelle mondiale pour lutter contre la crise climatique. Cette vision originale conduit à repenser les deux autres types de territoire que nous avons identifiés : les territoires urbains et ceux de « nature ordinaire ».

2. Les territoires urbains

En effet, à l’autre bout du spectre, se trouvent des espaces qui nous ont permis de nous affranchir des aléas de la nature. Il s’agit des espaces urbains. Depuis le début de ce siècle et les premiers effets du changement climatique, la demande de nature en ville s’accentue et conduit à un vaste mouvement qui voit nos villes et nos grandes métropoles se verdir. Mais aussi — parce que ces zones urbaines s’étendent et accueillent une part croissante d’une population mondiale qui va augmentant — ces espaces urbains viennent empiéter sur les espaces de nature protégés et leur empreinte affecte toutes les zones du globe.

Travaillant actuellement avec un réseau de 33 villes situées sur des territoires de zones « à risque », Richard Weller a réalisé une cartographie précise indiquant à quels endroits exactement la ville – ou ses infrastructures – va entrer en conflit avec la biodiversité. Selon lui, l’objectif n’est pas de stopper le développement de ces villes mais plutôt de le concevoir en l’orientant vers certaines zones de façon à en éviter, contourner d’autres pour maintenir les continuités écologiques nécessaires à la préservation de la biodiversité. Le chercheur nous invite à une autre vision des villes et de la nature, où les unes et l’autre se développent en symbiose et non en opposition : « Il va falloir reprogrammer le développement urbain pour que les villes entrent en symbiose avec leur habitat et ne soient plus des parasites. Nous n’avons pas d’autre choix que de planifier et de concevoir un autre développement urbain et de rendre des comptes à tous types de vie sur Terre. »

Des témoignages des intervenants, il ressort que les villes pèsent d’un poids de moins en moins soutenable sur l’ensemble des écosystèmes de la planète. Et les inégalités se creusent : l’accès à la nature dans les villes les plus riches est inégalement réparti. Le développement anarchique des villes dans les pays du Sud menace des zones de biodiversité remarquables, indispensables au bon fonctionnement de l’ensemble des écosystèmes qui constituent ces espaces urbains.  Les plus démunis sont aussi ceux qui vivent dans les environnements les plus dégradés. Toutefois, depuis le début de ce siècle, la prise de conscience qu’un autre modèle est possible gagne du terrain.  Quatre points donnent des raisons d’espérer :

a) La mobilisation des réseaux de collectivités locales, des ONG, des citoyens, des élus et des gestionnaires pousse nombre de villes à agir. Diagnostic partagé, planification urbaine privilégiant la création et l’accès aux espaces verts, gestion différenciée de ces espaces de nature en ville, désartificialisation et renaturation des sols, mise en place de dispositifs favorisant le retour des espèces de flore, de faune (dont les pollinisateurs) en ville se développent.

b) Pour gagner encore en efficacité, la collaboration entre les municipalités et les acteurs privés – ie. entreprises, commerces, ensembles d’habitation, etc. – permet de gagner de nouveaux espaces verts sans étendre encore la surface des villes notamment par la végétalisation des toits, des murs ou l’ouverture au public d’espaces verts privés. Réglementations encourageant les pratiques vertueuses, labels, référentiels se mettent en place et concourent à une dynamique positive.

c) Certaines municipalités travaillent déjà à élargir leur action au-delà de leur territoire pour aider les agriculteurs à produire de façon plus soutenable, en encourageant l’agriculture bio, à préserver la ressource en eau.

d) Parce qu’elles accueillent une part croissante de la population, que ce sont des lieux de culture, d’innovation et d’échanges, c’est aussi dans les villes que peuvent advenir les solutions qui permettront l’avènement d’une véritable civilisation écologique à travers la mise en place des solutions fondées sur la nature.

3. Les territoires de nature ordinaire

Entre les espaces protégés et les villes, il reste ce qui fait l’essentiel des écosystèmes de notre planète : qu’en France nous appelons la « nature ordinaire ». Cette nature est dite « ordinaire » parce qu’elle est commune – au sens où elle n’est pas « rare ». Par ce terme on désigne aussi bien les champs cultivés que les forêts ou les déserts. C’est ce qui n’est pas protégé, pas défini comme « exceptionnel » mais qui n’est pas non plus de l’urbain. Aujourd’hui, ce sont les espaces les plus menacés par les changements d’usage, la surexploitation, le changement climatique, la pollution, etc. et ce, également à cause de notre négligence.La concentration de la population dans les villes nous conduit à les déserter, et ce faisant à les délaisser alors même qu’ils nous fournissent notre nourriture, l’eau, l’air, l’essentiel de nos ressources.

Tous les intervenants se sont accordés sur l’urgence à protéger ces espaces qui assurent le maintien de notre vie sur terre et sont pourtant aujourd’hui mis en grand danger par nos pratiques, notamment agricoles. La difficulté à les nommer – le concept de « nature ordinaire » est difficile à traduire en anglais : le terme utilisé « productive landscape » n’en désigne qu’une partie est à mettre en regard de notre difficulté à les gérer durablement.

a) La nécessité de repenser entièrement notre agriculture ne pourra se faire qu’en articulant action locale et globale. Il s’agit par exemple de revoir à la fois les pratiques agricoles et l’organisation même des marchés et nos modes de consommation pour réduire la part de produits animaux et le gaspillage de denrées alimentaires. Pour cela, il faut sortir de la logique des politiques « en silo » : articuler production agricole et protection de la nature. Plus globalement, repenser tous nos systèmes d’exploitation des ressources naturelles pour qu’ils ne détruisent pas irrémédiablement nos écosystèmes, ce à quoi nous invitent les objectifs du développement durable (ODD).

b) Les gouvernements locaux et infranationaux sont moteurs dans la restauration des écosystèmes de nature ordinaire pour le bénéfice des populations qui y vivent et en vivent.

c) Plus encore que pour les aires protégées, la mobilisation de tous les acteurs est indispensable à la protection effective de cette nature ordinaire qui participe à la préservation de la nature extraordinaire. Chacun doit s’y atteler en fonction de ses compétences et ses moyens. Aucune entreprise ne peut considérer cela comme accessoire.

Systèmes de financement et gouvernance ?

S’il est évident que la préservation d’un espace de nature protégé ne relève pas des mêmes règles, ni du même type de financements que ceux qui utilisés pour gérer les espaces verts en ville, les zones agricoles, l’océan, les déserts ou les forêts par exemple, la nature est UNE, et tous ces types de nature s’entrecroisent, s’entremêlent.

Aussi, le quatrième et dernier volet de cette série a-t-il été consacré aux questions de finance et gouvernance. Les gouvernements infranationaux sont aux avant-postes du combat contre le changement climatique et pour la biodiversité : ils sont proches d’une population en demande de nature, d’une population qui prend conscience que nous ne pouvons pas continuer à sacrifier notre futur et celui de nos enfants à un présent de plus en plus incertain, d’une population qui supporte de plus en plus mal d’être la victime de l’exploitation intensive, des pollutions, de tout ce qui dégrade notre environnement. C’est peut-être ce qui conduit les gouvernements infranationaux à innover, à proposer des solutions qui sont ensuite reprises par les États nationaux et les institutions internationales. Ainsi, rappelons-nous qu’une des toutes premières Obligations Vertes – les fameux Green bonds – a été lancée – en 2001 ! – par la ville de San Francisco pour financer la mise en œuvre d’un vaste plan d’installation d’énergie solaire – en réponse à la crise énergétique qui touchait alors la Californie. Les obligations vertes sont aujourd’hui mises en œuvre par les états et remportent un vrai succès.

Cependant, les questions de financement ne peuvent pas être considérées indépendamment des questions de gouvernance. Plus que jamais, les décisions des uns impactent le devenir des autres. Les effets du changement climatique causent plus de morts au Sud qu’au Nord alors même que le Sud n’est que marginalement responsable des émissions de gaz à effet de serre. Que va-t-il se passer quand les glaciers de l’Himalaya, troisième réservoir planétaire d’eau douce qui alimentent les principaux fleuves d’Asie : Indus, Gange, Brahmapoutre, Mékong, (Yangtsé), Fleuve jaune – vont disparaître ?  La vie de près d’un tiers de l’Humanité en dépend.

Aussi, pour le futur de l’humanité, nous ne pouvons laisser les seuls pays riches accéder aux financements. Edgar Morin nous le rappelle : « la crise climatique, l’érosion de la biodiversité rappelle à la grande famille humaine la communauté de destin qui est la sienne. » Les questions de gouvernance et de finance sont étroitement liées. L’accès aux financements pour les gouvernements infranationaux est facilité quand il s’inscrit dans des coopérations avec leurs Etats, les institutions ou projets régionaux, ou encore en lien avec le privé.

Tous les intervenants partagent le même constat résumé en 4 points :

a) Nos modèles de développement ne sont pas durables, ils épuisent nos ressources naturelles.

b) La crise climatique met en danger nos économies au nord comme au sud.

c) Changer de modèle suppose des investissements massifs. Les plans de relance post-Covid constituent une réelle opportunité pour investir dans la réalisation d‘infrastructures vertes et bleues.

d) Les villes, en particulier, doivent se saisir de cette opportunité pour mettre en œuvre les solutions fondées sur la nature et recréer ainsi les emplois perdus pendant la pandémie.

En termes de financement, quatre leviers doivent être actionnés concomitamment pour relever ce fantastique défi :

a) Des réformes politiques : l’organisation des marchés, les réglementations et les critères d’attribution des aides et subventions n’encouragent pas le financement des infrastructures vertes et bleues, des systèmes de production durables ou des solutions fondées sur la nature.

b) Un renforcement de la coopération entre gouvernements infranationaux et secteur privé : Les solutions fondées sur la nature, les infrastructures vertes et bleues comme les systèmes de production durable nécessitent d’être conçus et mis en œuvre localement. En ce sens, les gouvernements infranationaux sont bien placés pour proposer leur mise en œuvre. Mais bien souvent, leur accès aux financements est limité par le montant de leurs demandes de crédits, considéré comme trop faible pour accéder aux fonds délivrés par les bailleurs publics. Une piste consiste pour les gouvernements infranationaux à renforcer leurs coopérations avec le secteur privé pour solliciter les bailleurs publics.

c) Un accroissement du nombre de projets réellement et durablement vertueux : si les projets liés à la production d’énergies renouvelables sont bien documentés et techniquement murs, ce n’est pas encore le cas pour les solutions fondées sur la nature, les infrastructures vertes et bleues ou les modes de production durable. Il existe un réel besoin de connaissances sur les bénéfices tirés à moyen et long terme de la mise en œuvre de ces innovations. Les gouvernements infranationaux constituent des territoires d’expérimentation qui pourraient gagner à coopérer avec les entreprises et la communauté scientifique.

d) Des synergies accrues entre le niveau de gouvernance infranational et mondial pour combiner changements de modes de production et de consommation avec les nécessaires réformes de l’organisation des marchés.

Mettre en œuvre ces leviers nécessite également une réforme de gouvernance qui articule étroitement l’action locale et les politiques nationales et globales, la recherche d’un équilibre entre systèmes politiques centralisés et décentralisés, à travers le concept développé par Bob Jessop et rappelé par Gaël Giraud de « Colibration ». Ce concept définit l’apprentissage d’une « collaboration » qui soit en même temps une « calibration », à savoir la recherche permanente d’interactions intelligentes et adaptées aux décisions, entre échelle locale et échelles centrales – étatiques et internationales. Retrouver de la « directionnalité » en politique sans réduire de manière artificielle la complexité des interactions entre société, économie et biodiversité, tel est selon Gaël Giraud le premier des grands défis de gouvernance que nous devons relever. Autre grand défi concernant l’administration des biens communs telle que définie par Elinor Ostrom – la biodiversité, comme la santé, en est un – la recherche de « méta-règles » qui s’imposent en cas de désaccord, afin d’arbitrer les conflits en conservant l’objectif défini ensemble auparavant.

Réconcilier 100% de l’humanité avec notre planète

Meriem Bouamrane, responsable scientifique du Programme MAB de l’UNESCO, nous rappelle que la pandémie de COVID 19 ouvre une période de transformation invitant à revoir notre relation à la nature, aux autres, à nos modes de vie et façons de travailler. Elle offre également des opportunités de financement sans précédent. Toutefois, et tous les intervenants l’ont souligné, nous ne pourrons relever ces défis qu’ensemble. Ensemble… Cela suppose de tenir compte des besoins de chacun, de casser les politiques opérant en silo qui perdurent malgré la feuille de route fixée collectivement avec les Objectifs du Développement durable, de penser la préservation de la biodiversité, toute la biodiversité, en cherchant dans le même temps à créer un futur plus juste, plus solidaire.

Pour ce faire, nous ne pourrons nous passer de la force extraordinaire d’action qui est celle des gouvernements locaux et infranationaux dont Christophe Nuttal, Directeur du R20, nous rappelle qu’ils détiennent 75% des solutions en termes de lutte contre le changement climatique. La Convention pour la Diversité biologique a été pionnière. Comme nous l’a rappelé Oliver Hillel, elle a été la première à reconnaître leur rôle aux côtés des Etats dans la lutte contre l’érosion de la biodiversité et l’utilisation durable des ressources naturelles. Puisse la CoP15 de la CBD nous donner les moyens de renforcer et d’institutionnaliser cette nécessaire coopération.

Stéphanie Lux, Elisabeth Chouraki, and Ingrid Coetzee
Paris, Paris, et Cape Town

On The Nature of Cities

 

 

Rethinking Nature Protection in the Context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by Linking Local and Regional Action with National and International Policies

Today, areas of ordinary nature — sometimes referred to as productive landscapes — are the most threatened by pollution, by unsustainable exploitation systems, and also by our negligence.

A Clear Statement

Based on the IUCN red list, the IUCN Chief Scientist, Thomas Brooks, warns of the unprecedented rate of biodiversity loss we are witnessing. We also know that while 95% of our livelihoods depend on cultivated soils, 52% of them are degraded or severely degraded.

It is within this context, while the first part of the latest IPCC report has just been made public, that the World Conservation Congress will open in Marseille. On this occasion, during the Assembly of its members, IUCN will decide on the possible membership of local authorities in the Union.

This Congress is part of the road between Edinburgh and the 15th Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CoP15 of the CBD) and the 7th Global Biodiversity Summit of Local and Subnational Governments, an official parallel event to the COP, at a time when discussions on renewing and strengthening the action plan on sub-national governments, cities, and other local authorities are well underway.

In preparation for the IUCN Congress, four webinars were organized with the support of the Post 2020 Biodiversity Framework – EU support project, financed by the European Union and implemented by Expertise France, and the French Office for Biodiversity (Office Français de la Biodiversité -OFB). They were held on June 22, 23, 29 and 30, each corresponding to a relevant theme.

Fontainebleau forest. Photo: Mairie de Fontainebleau

Diverse Domains of Nature

The first three webinars deal with the vast differences between lands and territories from the point of view of the natural landscapes that cover them. They focus on nature in terms of actions to be taken by local and sub-national governments to protect it, maintain it in good condition, and restore it when these lands are degraded.

1. Exceptional Nature

The lands and territories of the natural world which are exceptional or indispensable are all those which are most often needing to be subject to protection. Protective conservationist policies have a long history. The very first set of protections were put in place at the end of the 19th century and were predominantly motivated by a desire for them to be used. For example, the first protected natural area in the world was Fontainebleau in 1861, where an artistic reserve was created so that the Barbizon painters could continue to capture the beauty of the world for all to see through their paintings.

Then came Yellowstone in 1872, the first national park ever created to protect this area from exploitation and predation. For more than a century, these protected areas have been growing in size. Our management of these areas teaches us about diverse ways of life in nature. They can act as “pilot” areas or “laboratories” where we learn to protect nature, to take care of it, and to restore it too.

Credit: Yellowstone by James St-John

From the testimonies of the webinar participants, we can draw three important lessons:

a) Sustainably protecting exceptional natural areas requires taking into account all the needs of the people who live in and around these areas. When it comes to traffic on account of tourism, for example, this must be controlled to maintain a sustainable balance between nature conservation, and employment for local populations. This is also true for the green spaces of the City of Cape Town, which is careful to involve city dwellers right from the outset of its urban projects.

b) Prestigious protection labels, awarded by international bodies or institutions, should provide for a closer and more permanent involvement of sub-national governments, which are able to put in place pragmatic management methods to control the use of natural area sites and their accessibility, for example.

c)When sub-national governments are involved in the protection of exceptional natural spaces, protecting them creates dynamic benefit for the entire region. This is the case for the City of Saint François, which, starting with the protection of the Pointe des Châteaux site, has initiated a nature protection policy that goes beyond the perimeter of this remarkable place.

Credit: World Nature Park, Richard Weller

The rapidity with which climate change is affecting planetary ecosystems makes it necessary to accelerate the reconnection of protected natural areas. Richard Weller, Meyerson Chair in Urban Planning at the Weitzman School of Design at the University of Pennsylvania, points out the paradox that while humans have been very apt at driving connections and networking human life, technology, goods, and cargo, protected areas suffer from disconnection making it impossible for species to move and migrate, in some cases. While we have set ourselves the goal of protecting 17% of terrestrial areas with the Aichi targets, Richard Weller reminds us that there are currently 867 protected areas in the world.  Together, they represent about 15% of the Earth’s surface, which is a difference of 1 or 2% with the target.

However, these protected lands are like archipelagos in that they are isolated from each other. With the World Natural Park project, Weller proposes we create lines of connection that could alleviate this problem. For example, a pathway running from north to south on the American continent (the “Pataska”, from Patagonia to Alaska); another running from Libya to South Africa, and a third from Morocco to Central Asia and Australia. Just these three pathways would bring together 19 of the 36 hotspots, covering 55 nations and 160,000 km in total. This new ensemble of pathways could constitute a world natural park: the “World Park Project”. These pathways could become hiking trails and form a kind of green infrastructure: roads or paths in a city could lead to parks, leading to cultivated areas and then to protected areas, etc.

In Weller’s vision, these are not just areas for walking or hiking, but also spaces where you can work, and gather – unlike some traditionally conceived conservation and protected areas, where visitors are often excluded. This world nature park does not aim to reinforce the current protected areas but to protect those teleconnections in between, which we need to work on to ultimately protect earth’s ecosystems and habitats from extinction. Moreover, to do so on a global scale to additionally fight this threat that has only increased due to the climate crisis.

This original vision leads us to rethink the two other types of lands and territories we have identified: urban environments and those of ordinary nature.

2. Urban Environments

Apart from exceptional nature, on the other side of the spectrum, the urban environment is a vastly different space. Since the beginning of this century, and with the first effects of climate change, the demand for nature in the city has increased and led to a vast movement that is working ever harder to make our cities and major metropolises greener in an effort to curb global warming and other effects of climate change. Due to the fact that urban areas are expanding and a rapidly increasing share of the world’s growing population now lives in cities – these urban spaces are encroaching on protected nature areas, and their footprint is affecting all areas of the globe.

Currently working with a network of 33 cities located in “at risk” areas, Richard Weller has produced a precise map showing exactly where the city – or its infrastructure – will conflict with biodiversity. According to him, the objective is not to stop the development of these cities but rather to design it by orienting it towards certain zones in order to avoid or bypass others in order to maintain the ecological continuities necessary for the preservation of biodiversity. Weller invites us to imagine another vision of cities and nature, where both develop in symbiosis and not in opposition. Weller says, “We will have to reprogram urban development so that cities enter into symbiosis with their habitat and are no longer parasites. We have no choice but to plan and design a different kind of urban development and be accountable to all types of life on Earth.”

From the testimonies of the speakers, it is clear that cities are weighing more and more unsustainably on the planet’s ecosystems as a whole. And inequalities are growing: access to nature in the richest cities is unevenly distributed. The often-informal development of cities in the countries of the South threatens remarkable areas of biodiversity, which are essential to the proper functioning of all the ecosystems that make up these urban areas. The poorest people are also those who live in the most degraded environments. However, since the beginning of this century, awareness that another model is possible has been gaining ground.

Three points give us reason for hope:

a) The mobilization of local government networks, NGOs, citizens, elected officials, and managers is pushing many cities to act. Shared diagnoses, urban planning that favors the creation of and access to green spaces, differentiated management of these natural spaces in the city, reconstituting soils, and setting up systems that encourage the return of species of flora and fauna (including pollinators) to the city are all developing. To gain even more efficiency, collaboration between municipalities and private actors – i.e. companies, businesses, housing estates, etc. – makes it possible to gain new green spaces without the need for big budgets.

b) To gain further efficiency, collaboration between municipalities and private actors – i.e. companies, businesses, housing estates, etc. – makes it possible to gain new green spaces without extending the surface of the cities, in particular through the greening of roofs, walls, or the opening of private green spaces to the public. Regulations encouraging ecological practices, labels, and reference systems are being put in place and contribute to a positive dynamic.

c) Some municipalities are already working to extend their action beyond their territory to help farmers produce in a more sustainable way, by encouraging organic farming, to preserve water resources. Because they are home to a growing share of the population and are places of culture, innovation, and exchange, it is also in cities that solutions can be found that will allow the advent of a true ecological civilization through the implementation of nature-based solutions.

3. Ordinary Nature

Between protected areas and the cities, there remains another essential part of our planet’s ecosystems: which in France we call “ordinary nature”. This nature is called “ordinary” because it is part of most people’s common experience. Such nature is not rare or remarkable; people encounter it every day. This may include cultivated fields, as well as forests or deserts, depending on the landscape and lands of that region. It is what is not protected, not defined as “exceptional” but which is not urban either. Today, these are the spaces that are most threatened by changes in use, overexploitation, climate change, pollution, and also by negligence. The concentration of a growing population in cities leads us to desert them, and in so doing to neglect them, even though they provide us with our food, water, air, and most of our resources.

All the speakers agreed on the urgency of protecting these spaces which ensure the maintenance of our life on earth and which are increasingly endangered by our practices, especially agricultural. The concept of “ordinary nature” is difficult to translate into English: the term “productive landscape” is another common usage, but only designates a part of what the term ordinary nature encompasses. Important points that resulted include:

a) The need to completely rethink agricultural practices can only be done by articulating local and global action. For example, it is necessary to review both agricultural practices and the very organization of markets and our consumption patterns to reduce the share of animal products and food waste. To do this, we must break out of the logic of “silo” policies: articulate agricultural production and nature protection. More globally, we need to rethink all our natural resource exploitation systems so that they do not irreparably destroy our ecosystems, which is what the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) invite us to do.

b) Local and sub-national governments are driving the restoration of ordinary ecosystems for the benefit of the people who live in and from them.

c) Even more than just for protected areas, the mobilization of all stakeholders is essential for the effective protection of ordinary nature, which contributes to the preservation of extraordinary nature. Everyone must work on this according to their skills and means. No company can consider this as an accessory.

Financing systems and governance?

The preservation of a protected nature area does not fall under the same rules, nor the same type of financing as those used to manage green spaces in the city, in agricultural areas, or the ocean, deserts, and forests, for example. Yet, all of these ecosystems are connected and nature is ONE, so all of these types of nature intertwine, and intermingle. Therefore, the fourth and final part of this series was devoted to the issues of finance and governance. Sub-national and local governments are at the forefront of the fight against climate change and for biodiversity: they are close to a population in demand for nature, a population that is becoming aware that we cannot continue to sacrifice our future and that of our children to an increasingly uncertain present, a population that is increasingly resentful of being the victim of intensive exploitation, pollution, and everything that degrades our environment. This is perhaps what leads all levels of sub-national governments to innovate, to propose solutions that are then taken up by national states and international institutions. Thus, let us remember that one of the very first Green Bonds was launched – in 2001! – by the City of San Francisco to finance the implementation of a vast solar energy installation plan – in response to the energy crisis that was affecting California at the time. Green bonds are now being implemented by states and are proving to be a real success. However, financing issues cannot be considered in isolation from governance issues. More than ever, the decisions of some affect the future of others. The effects of climate change cause more deaths in the South than in the North, even though the South is only marginally responsible for greenhouse gas emissions.

What future do we want?

What will happen when the Himalayan glaciers, the third largest reservoir of fresh water in the world, which feed the main rivers of Asia: Indus, Ganges, Brahmaputra, Mekong, (Yangtze), Yellow River – disappear?  The lives of nearly a third of humanity depend on it.

Also, for the future of humanity, we cannot let richer countries alone have access to financing. Edgar Morin reminds us that “the climate crisis and the erosion of biodiversity remind humanity of its common destiny.” The issues of governance and finance are closely linked. Access to financing for sub-national governments is facilitated when it is part of cooperation with their states, regional institutions or projects, or in connection with the private sector.

All the speakers drew the following collective conclusions:

a) Our development models are not sustainable, they exhaust our natural resources.

b) The climate crisis is endangering our economies in the North and in the South.

c) Changing our model requires massive investments. The post-Covid recovery plans are a real opportunity to invest in green and blue infrastructure.

d) Cities, in particular, must seize this opportunity to implement nature-based solutions and thus recreate the jobs lost during the pandemic.

In terms of financing, four levers need to be activated concomitantly to meet this fantastic challenge:

a) Policy reforms: the organization of markets, regulations, and criteria for granting subsidies and grants do not encourage the financing of green and blue infrastructure, sustainable production systems, or nature-based solutions, are not enough alone.

b) Strengthening cooperation between all levels of sub-national governments and the private sector: Nature-based solutions, green and blue infrastructure, and sustainable production systems need to be designed and implemented locally. In this sense, subnational governments are well-positioned to design their implementation. But often, their access to funding is limited by the size of their loan applications, which are considered too small to access funds from public donors. One approach is for sub-national governments to strengthen their cooperation with the private sector to solicit public donors.

c) An increase in the number of truly and sustainably ecological projects: while projects related to renewable energy production are well documented and proven to be technically feasible, this is not yet the case for nature-based solutions, green and blue infrastructure, or sustainable production methods. There is a real need for knowledge on the medium and long-term benefits of implementing these innovations. Sub-national and local governments are territories of experimentation that could benefit from cooperation with businesses and the scientific community.

d) Increased synergies between the sub-national and global levels of governance to combine changes in production and consumption patterns with the necessary reforms in market organization.

Implementing these levers also requires a reform of governance that closely articulates local action and national and global policies, the search for a balance between centralized and decentralized political systems, through the concept developed by Bob Jessop and recalled by Gaël Giraud of “Colibration”. This concept defines the learning of a “collaboration” that is at the same time a “calibration”, i.e. the permanent search for intelligent interactions adapted to decisions, between local and central scales – state and international. According to Gaël Giraud, the first of the major governance challenges we must meet is to rediscover “directionality” in politics without artificially reducing the complexity of interactions between society, the economy, and biodiversity. Another major challenge concerning the administration of common goods as defined by Elinor Ostrom – biodiversity, like health, is one of them – is the search for “meta-rules” that can be imposed in the event of disagreement, in order to arbitrate conflicts while preserving the objective defined together beforehand.

Reconciling 100% of humanity with nature

Meriem Bouamrane, Chief scientist of the programme MAB UNESCO, reminds us that the COVID-19 pandemic opens a period of transformation inviting us to rethink our relationship with nature, with others, with our lifestyles, and our ways of working. It also offers unprecedented funding opportunities. However, as all the speakers emphasized, we can only meet these challenges together. Together… This implies taking into account the needs of everyone, breaking down policies operating in silos that persist despite the roadmap set-out collectively with the Sustainable Development Goals, thinking about the preservation of biodiversity, all biodiversity, while at the same time seeking to create a fairer, more united future.

To do this, we cannot do without the extraordinary force of action of local and sub-national governments, of which Christophe Nuttal, Director of the R20, reminds us that they hold 75% of the solutions in terms of the fight against climate change. The Convention on Biological Diversity was a pioneer. As Oliver Hillel reminded us in one of the webinars, the convention was the first to recognize the role of subnational governments alongside States in the fight against biodiversity loss and the sustainable use of natural resources. May the CoP15 of the CBD give us the means to strengthen and institutionalize this necessary cooperation.

Stéphanie Lux, Elisabeth Chouraki, and Ingrid Coetzee
Paris, Paris, and Cape Town

On The Nature of Cities

 

 

 

 

 

Elisabeth Chouraki

About the Writer:
Elisabeth Chouraki

Elisabeth Chouraki coordinates the Post-2020 Biodiversity Framework - EU support project implemented by Expertise France and funded by the European Union.

Ingrid Coetzee

About the Writer:
Ingrid Coetzee

Ingrid has more than 30 years’ experience in sustainability and governance. Her work focuses on mainstreaming nature, its benefits, and nature-based solutions into urban planning and decision-making in cities and city regions thereby helping them become healthier, and more resilient and liveable places.

Resilience and the Butterfly Effect: Could a Grain of Quinoa from Bolivia Influence Barcelona City Resilience?

Many voices. Greener cities. Better cities.

Edward Lorenz’s application of chaos theory to weather forecasting is better known to the general public as “the butterfly effect”, thanks to his conference presentation, “Does the flap of a butterfly’s wings in Brazil set off a tornado in Texas?” Lorenz’s law explains to us that there are unknown and invisible (to us) chains of interlinked effects such that any small variation in a system can induce big changes in the long term. One of the meanings of this idea is the assumption that real word phenomena are too complex to be explained or to have their consequences forecasted through simplistic, cause-effects dynamics. In this sense, any small decision can influence the long chains of interactions which will constitute the big picture we see.

It isn’t yet clear what food market booms imply in the long term for rural villages from the perspectives of ecology, socio-cultural changes, regional population movements, and infrastructure.

While I’m writing this, I’m in an organic restaurant in Barcelona, in front of a quinoa salad. I know I’m the final consumer placed at the end of a long food chain.

Maybe some readers already know, or remember, the incredible wave of newspaper articles on quinoa in 2013, when the United Nations General Assembly declared 2013 as the International Year of Quinoa. For a few months, dozens of authors wrote about this super grain’s healthy, beneficial effects. Others complained about quinoa farming’s dramatic environmental consequences in the remote areas of developing countries, where it is produced. Others talked about how it was driving prices up so that Andean people could no longer afford it.

Then, silence.

This is our social attention span.

I’d like to share with you some thoughts on the relationship between consumers choices in cities and the related, emerging resilience and vulnerabilities trade-offs, which link far-flung territories. By resilience trade-offs, I refer to different leverage mechanisms by which increasing resilience in one place could lead to increasing vulnerability in other far-away places, due to unclear, enchained effects. By doing this, I want also to challenge both the negative bias of vulnerability and the positive one of resilience. How does the butterfly effect relate to this? Stay with me: there is something to learn about resilience, vulnerability, and cities from the quinoa revolution.

But what is the quinoa revolution?

Quinoa (but it could have been Ethiopian teff, the next super-grain, or coconut water, or oil palm, since quinoa just serves as an example) is a highly nutritious grain-like crop cultivated by the farmers of the Andes for over 7,000 years, mainly for subsistence purposes. This “peasant food” has adapted to grow under the most harsh environmental conditions (drought, salinity, hail, wind, frost) and is the only vegetable food that possesses all of the amino acids essential to humans. However, it has never had any market or commercial value. Or, at least, not before the 1980s. In fact, in 1983, the establishment of the National Association of Quinoa Producers, or ANAPQUI, and, a few years later (in 1986) the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations’ identifying quinoa as a strategic food for the Andean region, contributed to launching quinoa in the regional and Latin American markets. As a result, in 1996, FAO acknowledged the nutritional importance of quinoa and catalogued it among the promising crops of humanity and, along with other underutilized food crops, as a potential solution to human malnutrition. Recognizing quinoa as a highly nutritious food caught the interest of American and European consumers. Today, quinoa can be found in any organic shop of any global city.

Fig 1
The world-wide market for quinoa. Bolivia’s export of quinoa in tons and its evolution from 2008 to 2012. Image: Chelleri, L, Minucci, G. and Skrimizea E. (under review) “On quinoa revolution and vulnerability trade-offs”, Regional Environmental Change.

Vulnerability and resilience trade-offs

We could review the wave of scholarly and press articles presenting the general public pros (health effects) and cons (environmental degradation in Bolivia, or equity concerns regarding access to productive lands) of such a crop market boom. However, to me, this is not the most interesting issue. If you want to get to why, in cities, we should be aware of such cross-scale food market phenomena, you should take a step beyond the simplistic perceptions linking environmental degradation in Bolivia, food market speculations, and increasing quality of life in rich cities. From globalization, from the virtual shrinkage of distances and the related increased links among very faraway territories, emerges a complicated (and very dynamic) cocktail of opportunities and threats for both producers and consumers. The quinoa revolution falls into a category of opportunities that could empower both producers and consumers, building resilience into the food system. But such a rosy outcome is only theoretical, not realistic, given that new adaptations to these opportunities create new power dynamics and, inevitably, winners and losers.

We have become used to seeing resilience as a positive set of adaptive capacities (mainly related to diminishing risks and adapting to climate change or natural hazards), and vulnerability as the danger of been exposed to risky situations. Also, we have been told that increasing resilience corresponds to a proportional decrease in vulnerability. This is, generally speaking, true, and it does make sense. However, it is also too simplistic and not always adequate for describing our complex, hyper-connected, and fast-changing circumstances. In this regard, myself and other scholars have been recently working on emphasizing the policy nature of resilience (see these links for stepping from the classic ecological issue of “resilience of what to what”, to the critical geographers concern of “resilience for whom” and the “politics of resilient cities”). The emerging concept of “resilience trade-offs” explains such cross-scales and cross-systems leverage mechanisms between resilience and vulnerability, proposing that resilience, per se, is not always good, nor vulnerability bad. Increasing vulnerability to environmental degradation (take the case of quinoa mono-cropping, for instance) could indirectly mean increasing a set of capacities boosting well-being, knowledge, connections, and new development trajectories.

Take a look at Figure 2. These are very tiny villages, placed in remote areas at more than 4,000 m above sea levels, that have survived harsh climatic conditions for millennia. In order to survive these extreme climatic conditions, locals must know how to perfectly manage local resources, without eroding soil fertility or threatening groundwater reservoirs. Figure 2 explains the astonishing growth of quinoa-cropped lands in just 4 years, which in some cases now occupy most of the available arable land of the municipalities.

Fig 2-1
Quinoa field growth of selected Bolivian Altiplano villages. Image: Chelleri, L, Minucci, G. and Skrimizea E. (under review) “On quinoa revolution and vulnerability trade-offs”, Regional Environmental Change

Can you imagine what this food market boom implies for such rural villages from the perspectives of ecology, socio-cultural changes, regional population movements, infrastructural building opportunities, emerging technological solutions, and multinational partnerships?

In a recent study, I’ve addressed these complex consequences with my colleagues Guido Minucci and Eirini Skrimizea. The results of our five years of observations were:

  1. a specialization of villages in (and a general increase of) llamas and sheep livestock, since the manure is used as the main fertilizer for quinoa in accordance with traditions and organic farming requirements;
  2. emerging technological and mechanical innovations related to the use and management of water and to emerging national and international partnerships with NGOs;
  3. increasing internal (regional) mobility and skills related to marketing strategies to diversify quinoa crops;
  4. generational behavioural changes, which are both generating shocks among groups (urban versus rural people or different villages) and re-framing land-tenure rules, challenging the traditional common management of the lands.

While adapting to global food market stimuli brought Andean farmers a set of benefits and emerging capacities, we also observed a simultaneous increase of new threats and stresses, such as:

  1. the previously unknown risk of “water scarcity” (because of the intensive cropping and breeding);
  2. increasing social tensions and conflicts;
  3. increasing dependencies on external markets and mono-cropping (exposure to economic failure because of lack of diversification);
  4. increasing losses of rare ecosystems and biodiversity; and
  5. the loss of traditional social capital and cultural landscapes.

Can you get a clear picture, from this transition, of whether the Andean farmers are now more resilient or more vulnerable?

A simple answer is that they are no longer exposed and vulnerable to hunger and isolation, since they are no longer completely dependent on natural and climatic processes, as they were used for millennia. However, one of the side effects of this transition is that they are now entirely dependent on exogenous markets dynamics.

We don’t know if the quinoa market boom—which is threatening the Bolivia Altiplano fresh-water reservoir and biodiversity, apparently increasing villages’ vulnerability to climate change—is definitely a bad thing, or if these increasing vulnerabilities are temporary side-effects of establishing the basis for a development revolution in which locals will truly benefit in the near future, thanks to technical innovations and more sustainable cropping strategies. In this sense, a very minor change in some villages (a technical innovation related to water management, for example) could set the ground for a regional transition, which could have future implications for the quinoa market, and feedback loops again on producer threats or opportunities.

This potential recalls a recent and brilliant paper by Lauer et al., which helps us to challenge the common understanding of resilience as good and vulnerability as bad by stating that communities must inevitably negotiate different trade-offs as they manage resilience. The key step here is to understand such complexity, the uncertain system of evolution, and moving from the mainstream of “resilience building” to emergent “resilience and vulnerability management”.

Quinoa and the butterfly effect: how can a grain from Bolivia influence urban resilience in Barcelona?

Far from its geographical origins, quinoa (synergistically with other exotic organic super healthy products) is contributing, in cities, to a boost in business opportunities and quality of life. Writing this post from Barcelona, a city which is smoothly recovering from years of hard economic crisis, the only sectors which have definitely not shrunk, but have grown in the last few years, are the luxury sector, tourism, second-hand markets, and organic farming. In interviewing local organic farmers, nobody fears the competition of exotic healthy superfoods. On the contrary—they know that the organic market is just 3 percent (2015 data) of the total food market of the region, and almost any (local and exotic) organic product boom can contribute to promoting consumers’ behavioral change towards a more organic, healthy, and sustainability-oriented life style.

When, a few months ago, I was working on a paper assessing all the different facets of Barcelona’s “resiliency” (from the most classic risk reduction-oriented ones, to the urban ecosystem services or social ones), a key insight was realizing that the city’s “generic” and core resilience feature was the Catalan people’s business capacity and ambitions, which are strongly linked to their identity (being Catalan, and proud of their city). When referring to city resilience, we mostly look to the built environment: critical infrastructures, urban services supply (business continuity), and people’s safety from different hazards. However, in time and across city history, the resilience of a city is also based on its capacity to stay alive, and to stay alive means to maintain your economic performance.

Fig 3 quinoa shop
Figure 3. A quinoa shop. Photo: Lorenzo Chelleri

From being a small city just a century ago, Barcelona has attracted big events and has invested in its infrastructure, public spaces and, therefore, in its image as a trendy and vibrant Mediterranean city. The success of its urban governance is known to planners as the “Barcelona Model”. Based on effective public-private partnerships (although these are contested by most scholars because of the social bias of this model, which is mainly oriented towards city branding for enhancing city attractiveness and competitiveness), the city reinvented itself many times, pretending (and creating different brands) to be: after the Olympics, Barcelona the Green city, Barcelona the Smart City (thanks to its massive investment in technology and infrastructures) and, currently, Barcelona the Resilient City (since it was recognized by the UNISDR in 2013 as a resilient city role model, and in 2015 by the Rockefeller Foundation’s 100 Resilient Cities Challenge).

I lived in Barcelona for 6 years before returning to Italy, and in my neighbourhood I was impressed by the speed at which new trends and investments opened new activities and constantly kept change alive. Within the latest smart, green, resilient city moods, and under the current “Barcelona Inspires” city brand—launched from the Municipality to self-promote the creativity and business opportunities of the city—the emerging hipster, organic, handmade, healthy food lifestyle paradigm brought quinoa to me and, to the city, one of the many innovations playing their roles in the urban economy’s resilience. But how is this key economic resilience engine in Barcelona related to quinoa, and other emerging super-grains? How are these related to global commodity chains, and those chains to the mechanisms redistributing worldwide, temporary windows of opportunity, as well as related threats, to remote areas?

I cannot say definitively that a grain of quinoa from Bolivia can influence the success of Barcelona city resilience, but this grain from Bolivia, like teff from Ethiopia, or coconut water from the Philippines, is, indeed, a small player in interlinked global processes, which shape opportunities and innovations, vulnerabilities and resilience, in cities everywhere.

Lorenzo Chelleri
L’Aquila

On The Nature of Cities

Further resources

Chelleri, L., Waters, J.J., Olazabal, M. and Minucci, G. (2015). “Resilience trade-offs: addressing multiple scales and temporal aspects of urban resilience.” Environment and Urbanization, 27 (1) pp 181-198

Chelleri, L, Minucci, G. and Skrimizea E. (under review) “On quinoa revolution and vulnerability trade-offs”, Regional Environmental Change